Things that make you go hmmmm .. (Page 2): So you don't know why the twelfth applies to you having a constitutional right to v**e for POTUS? Thats because it doesn't. You bluffed ...

LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America

jcboy3 wrote:

In your narrow mind. But then, you're the one with the wrong COTUS reference.

You really do need to read a book.

Here, start with this one:

https://www.amazon.com/You-Are-Special-Lucados-Wemmicks/dp/0891079319/

So you don't know why the twelfth applies to you having a constitutional right to v**e for POTUS?

Thats because it doesn't.

You bluffed ... again.

I busted you ... again.

Learn from it ... if you can.

jcboy3

LWW wrote:

So you don't know why the twelfth applies to you having a constitutional right to v**e for POTUS?

Thats because it doesn't.

You bluffed ... again.

I busted you ... again.

Learn from it ... if you can.

Well, I didn't say that it did. I did connect the 12th Amendment to Article 2, Section 1, which address the e******n of the POTUS. And I did point out that you were referencing Article 2, Section 2. Which does not address the e******n of the POTUS.

In your rush to claim superiority, you are flubbing it. Can you see your feet?

LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America

jcboy3 wrote:

Well, I didn't say that it did. I did connect the 12th Amendment to Article 2, Section 1, which address the e******n of the POTUS. And I did point out that you were referencing Article 2, Section 2. Which does not address the e******n of the POTUS.

In your rush to claim superiority, you are flubbing it. Can you see your feet?

You got me ... GOOGLE beat my memory.

jcboy3

LWW wrote:

You got me ... GOOGLE beat my memory.

You got bitten by your own rush to judgment. My advice...follow your own advice.

BobHartung Loc: Bettendorf, IA

LWW wrote:

My l*****t friends here insist that:

1 - As a law abiding citizen I should be subject to ever expanding gubmint regulation of my second and first amendment rights.

2 - That asking for a simple ID to v**e for POTUS, which I have no right to do under the COTUS, is r****t and unfair.

Hmmmm ...

Consider also. I don't need to show any identification to v**e (probably the most important right we have), but I have to show identification to rent a motel room.

jcboy3

BobHartung wrote:

Consider also. I don't need to show any identification to v**e (probably the most important right we have), but I have to show identification to rent a motel room.

If it is the most important right we have, then how can it be restricted over whether you have "proper identification"?

BobHartung Loc: Bettendorf, IA

jcboy3 wrote:

If it is the most important right we have, then how can it be restricted over whether you have "proper identification"?

That is how we can stop i******s from v****g and from persons v****g twice by registering on the day of an e******n. Identification can be obtained at no cost. Oh yea, you have to think more than 5 minutes ahead.

BigBear Loc: Northern CT

jcboy3 wrote:

If it is the most important right we have, then how can it be restricted over whether you have "proper identification"?

It is to keep people out that don't belong. Much like the door of your home that you lock.

jcboy3

BigBear wrote:

It is to keep people out that don't belong. Much like the door of your home that you lock.

Entering my home is not your right. V****g is.

BobHartung Loc: Bettendorf, IA

jcboy3 wrote:

Entering my home is not your right. V****g is.

You must be from the Chicago machine where the mantra is "V**e early, V**e often".

jcboy3

BobHartung wrote:

You must be from the Chicago machine where the mantra is "V**e early, V**e often".

You are stealing my motto.

My other motto: "If it's worth doing, it's worth doing to excess"

BigBear Loc: Northern CT

jcboy3 wrote:

Entering my home is not your right. V****g is.

As non-citizens do not have the right to v**e here, we use ID's to keep them out.
Your semantics will not win here.

BigBear Loc: Northern CT

jcboy3 wrote:

You are stealing my motto.

My other motto: "If it's worth doing, it's worth doing to excess"

That's why I won't be limited to 10 rounds at a clip.

LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America

jcboy3 wrote:

If it is the most important right we have, then how can it be restricted over whether you have "proper identification"?

1 - To make sure one isn't depreciating the value of everyone’s legal v**e.

2 - Because a citizen has the right, a non citizen doesn’t.

Anything else I can help you with?

LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America

jcboy3 wrote:

You are stealing my motto.

My other motto: "If it's worth doing, it's worth doing to excess"

So you are not only a habitual liar, but a criminal as well.