the future of DSLR (Page 2): unfortunately, your comment also applies to many of the comments and responses from UHH members...

Ed Chu Loc: Las Vegas NV

JohnSwanda wrote:

It's hard to take an article seriously which has as many grammatical errors as this one does.

unfortunately, your comment also applies to many of the comments and responses from UHH members

Mac Loc: Pittsburgh, Philadelphia now Hernando Co. Fl.

Ed Chu wrote:

interesting article here ( many more to follow, I am sure ):

https://outlook.live.com/mail/deleteditems/id/AQMkADAwATExAGQ2Ny00Yzg2LTYyNzYtMDACLTAwCgBGAAAD2G3WS%2BgN8EOcbWxNUTARqwcAT9Kg9T%2BMYkaac%2BS7OGcD5wAAAgEKAAAAT9Kg9T%2BMYkaac%2BS7OGcD5wACrkzbIwAAAA%3D%3D

dump the DSLRs now, before they lose their value ?

This is massively stupid.
Even if the value of every DSLR on the face of the earth dropped to 1 penny, that doesn't mean those DSLRs would stop working. Only a moron would dump their DSLR gear because of a value depreciation.

Mac Loc: Pittsburgh, Philadelphia now Hernando Co. Fl.

Longshadow wrote:

Mine is nine years old, it has already "lost its value", but to me, just like all my "older" cars, it still has great value to me.
More than it would for anyone else. Value is relative.

rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA

Ed Chu wrote:

interesting article here ( many more to follow, I am sure ):

https://outlook.live.com/mail/deleteditems/id/AQMkADAwATExAGQ2Ny00Yzg2LTYyNzYtMDACLTAwCgBGAAAD2G3WS%2BgN8EOcbWxNUTARqwcAT9Kg9T%2BMYkaac%2BS7OGcD5wAAAgEKAAAAT9Kg9T%2BMYkaac%2BS7OGcD5wACrkzbIwAAAA%3D%3D

dump the DSLRs now, before they lose their value ?

The current value of my KP does not affect the value of photos it produces in my hands.

I have never sold a camera ..... I use one until a new one offers something I need, and then I use the old one as its backup.

Blenheim Orange Loc: Michigan

That site is nothing but a hustle, quickly and sloppily put together to make money by people clicking referral links. Can the text on that page even be called an "article?" What a joke. What value did you see in it that you would post a link to it here?

Mike

Arubalou

Correct....just cause there is new technology doesnt mean your current rig is junk.

rook2c4 Loc: Philadelphia, PA USA

Bill_de wrote:

Knowing will improve their photography at least 300%.

I doubt it. Practicing on the camera you already have is what makes the biggest difference. Knowing what camera someone else is using not so much. Some people think all one needs to do is read about photography to become a better photographer. But that's like saying the more one reads about swimming, the better a swimmer one becomes. It helps, but only to a point.

speters Loc: Grangeville/Idaho

Ed Chu wrote:

interesting article here ( many more to follow, I am sure ):

https://outlook.live.com/mail/deleteditems/id/AQMkADAwATExAGQ2Ny00Yzg2LTYyNzYtMDACLTAwCgBGAAAD2G3WS%2BgN8EOcbWxNUTARqwcAT9Kg9T%2BMYkaac%2BS7OGcD5wAAAgEKAAAAT9Kg9T%2BMYkaac%2BS7OGcD5wACrkzbIwAAAA%3D%3D

dump the DSLRs now, before they lose their value ?

Mine will never loose their value (to me)!

BebuLamar

I see this type of discussion often. My question is does it matter? For me it's irrelevant one way or another.

blackest Loc: Ireland

Mirrorless full frame is the current next big thing that the manufacturers would like you to buy. Has little to do with good photography. If you read and watch enough you come to realise it is just a sales pitch.

Bill_de Loc: US

BebuLamar wrote:

I see this type of discussion often. My question is does it matter? For me it's irrelevant one way or another.

This type of discussion must matter. Otherwise people wouldn't take the time to post that it doesn't matter to them.

--

Rongnongno Loc: FL

blackest wrote:

Mirrorless full frame is the current next big thing that the manufacturers would like you to buy. Has little to do with good photography. If you read and watch enough you come to realise it is just a sales pitch.

Sales pitch:

You use your phone screen already. Adapting this to cameras screen will bring you the world of 'real photography'.

It has nothing to do with 'regular photography' but the need for companies to reach a greater audience. I will not work as it means using two devices against one - folks are intrinsically lazy.

AndyH Loc: Massachusetts and New Hampshire

Next thing they’ll be claiming that 35mm rangefinders and medium format SLRs will become obsolete.

I wonder when they’re going to stop working?

Andy