Why does the left think guns are bad but a******n is OK.
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
Another believer in untermensch.
where the hell did you get the idea that conservative women don't get their share of a******ns? or even professing Christian women.
jcboy3 wrote:
No babies were k**led by a******n. Only fetuses.
This is so d********g. You are exactly like the N**is who believed that certain types of people were subhuman. This is the the pinnacle of human depravity, and yet you are the guys that have the gall to call us "N**is." I keep thinking more and more that lefitism is a mental disease.
jcboy3 wrote:
No babies were k**led by a******n. Only fetuses.
And that contempt for innocent life is why people don’t believe the left’s claim that they want to save lives by banning guns.
The supreme court ruled that women have a constitutional right to have an a******n. Republican state legislators have recently placed so many restrictions on a******ns that they have effectively removed that right. In my state of KY, a woman must drive across the state to the only a******n provider, walk through a gauntlet of crazies who should mind their own business, have consults from two doctors, a viewing with description of an ultrasound, etc.,etc. Imagine if there were only one gun store per state and it was ruled by as many stipulations as conservatives have placed on a woman's legal right to an a******n?
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
gorgehiker wrote:
The supreme court ruled that women have a constitutional right to have an a******n. Republican state legislators have recently placed so many restrictions on a******ns that they have effectively removed that right. In my state of KY, a woman must drive across the state to the only a******n provider, walk through a gauntlet of crazies who should mind their own business, have consults from two doctors, a viewing with description of an ultrasound, etc.,etc. Imagine if there were only one gun store per state and it was ruled by as many stipulations as conservatives have placed on a woman's legal right to an a******n?
The supreme court ruled that women have a constitu... (
show quote)
And there we have it ... a court wrote the law that didn’t prior exist.
And why is there only one clinic?
A cursory examination of the facts melts your argument.
What is the supreme court to do when considering a case that our forefathers could not possibly imagine in 1787? A******ns didn't exist, and neither did semi-automatic weapons. The reason that you can have a semi-automatic weapon but not a canon is because of a supreme court ruling that has been honored. The ruling that protects a woman's right to an a******n is not being honored by state legislatures that make it nearly impossible for a woman to exercise her right to an a******n.
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
gorgehiker wrote:
What is the supreme court to do when considering a case that our forefathers could not possibly imagine in 1787? A******ns didn't exist, and neither did semi-automatic weapons. The reason that you can have a semi-automatic weapon but not a canon is because of a supreme court ruling that has been honored. The ruling that protects a woman's right to an a******n is not being honored by state legislatures that make it nearly impossible for a woman to exercise her right to an a******n.
Where in the COTUS does the federal gubmint have the authority to regulate a******n either way?
BTW ... auto weapons did exist at the time of the revolution, the founders stately wanted the citizenry armed as well as the gubmint and it is not against federal law to own a cannon.
Steven Seward wrote:
Crime rates are declining. You could have something there, though that would be a grossly immoral way to reduce crime. I would prefer to k**l the criminals when they are actually found to be guilty of something rather than a Pharoah-like extermination of all babies, whether they turn out to be criminals or not.
Sounds like a fisherman. Through back the small ones and catch them later when they are trophies.
Wrangler wrote:
So does a******n.
a******ns very rarely k**ls persons. A fetus is not a person. Earlier stages even more so.
Wrangler wrote:
Were the fetuses deprived of life?
No more so than a nocturnal emission.
LWW wrote:
Why do you lie?
Your fall back position when you have nothing (intelligent) to say.
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
jcboy3 wrote:
Your fall back position when you have nothing (intelligent) to say.
Nope, my fallback position when you lie.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.