John_F Loc: Minneapolis, MN

White nationalism’s solution to c*****e c****e: fewer brown people
By Dawn Stover, August 6, 2019

The white man charged with k*****g 22 people in El Paso on Saturday is believed to be the author of a r****t “manifesto” posted shortly before the shooting rampage. The h**e-filled screed described a “Hispanic invasion of Texas” and warned that w***e A******ns are being “replaced” by foreigners. The manifesto also sounded a growing theme in far-right rhetoric: that nonwhite people are responsible for environmental problems ranging from litter to c*****e c****e. Although the manifesto didn’t explicitly refer to c*****e c****e, its author titled the four-page document “The Inconvenient T***h,” seemingly a reference to Al Gore’s campaign to raise awareness about g****l w*****g.

The forced marriage of w***e s*******y and environmentalism is not new (Adolf Hitler, for one, advocated both racial and environmental purity), but once again it is birthing ugly “solutions,” from shunning refugees to ethnic cleansing. Even those on the far right who don’t “believe” in c*****e c****e are happy to jump on the environmental bandwagon. As the far-right author and media pundit Ann Coulter tweeted last year, “I’m fine with pretending to believe in g****l w*****g if we can save our language, culture & borders.”

In an article about white nationalists discovering the environment, The Atlantic explains the manifesto writer’s mentality:
The American lifestyle is destroying the environment, the author declares. But the answer is not to ask native-born w***e A******ns to change their ways. It is to rid the country of Latinos.

It is not brown-skinned immigrants who are primarily responsible for environmental degradation, though. In fact, c*****e c****e and other environmental crises are driving migration, not the other way around. As The Atlantic reminds readers, “Large corporations and the wealthy consume the most environmental resources, not poor immigrants.”

Population growth is, of course, contributing to c*****e c****e, along with rising affluence and per-capita consumption. But rather than tackling any of these issues, the manifesto’s author proposes genocide: “If we can get rid of enough people, then our way of life can become more sustainable.”

Environmentalism, particularly c*****e c****e, has traditionally been a concern of liberals. But in the United States and Europe, some on the far right are merging environmental issues with nationalism, a blend dubbed “eco-f*****m.”

Writing in The Nation, Jeet Heer describes how eco-f*****m may find a toehold in US politics: This combination of a white nationalism with angst about the prospects for human survival is a perfect recipe for radicalizing young right-wingers and taking Trumpian themes to a new level of extremism. Instead of the merely restorationist day-dream of “making American great again,” the extreme right is using social media agitprop and the propaganda of the deed to harden young w***e A******ns for a global race war fought over diminishing resources. The very real dangers of c*****e c****e provide race war fantasists the dystopian background they need to give urgency to their violent agenda.

While left-leaning environmentalists have become increasing tolerant of immigration, The Atlantic notes that “opposition to immigration plays an ever-greater role in defining the conservative movement.” Among registered Republican v**ers, immigration is viewed as the country’s most important problem. A growing number of young Republicans, however, view c*****e c****e as a top priority. Eco-f*****ts want to connect those dots.


Publication Name: The Atlantic

EyeSawYou

Yes he was a despicable white nationalist. Why not talk also about the Dayton shooter? Oh yeah he wasn’t a white nationalist he was actually a Democrat.

Frank T Loc: New York, NY

Have you read the latest on the dayton shooter and how he k**led his t*********red sister first before he decided to murder more people.
Sounds like a Republican to me.

letmedance Loc: Walnut, Ca.

DSAI. 🐬❄️❄️❄️❄️❄️