1) I exposed to the left (under exposed). I did this so I had details to work with in highlights.
2) I used PicCure+ an Adaptive deconvolution program.
3) I used the anti-shake filter built into PScc.
4) Nik filters.
Did I overdo it?
One thing that I do like about this photo is that you can see the effect of the "hair light" that hits her from above and behind.
I cannot be sure, when I went to double-download the hummer flew away!
I do not see the tell tale signs of over sharpening, so go with it.
The finest hummer photo I’ve seen!
Great shot, Dave, fantastic sharpness.
James Van Ells wrote:
I do not see the tell tale signs of over sharpening, so go with it.
I did not use the tools that normally give you signs of over sharpening.
After I posted it I realized that I had used 600mm with a 1.4X TC attached (effective 840mm lens.) That makes focusing difficult, and a matter of luck.
Earnest Botello wrote:
Great shot, Dave, fantastic sharpness.
Thanks, that's what I was going for in this photo.
Zario
Loc: sacramento, CA
Wow & Wow. Beautiful. However luck factored into this wonderfol photo it took a back seat to talent, creativity, experience and lots of sweat. Thank you for sharing it.
I think you got it just right, Dave
Ed
Feathers are soft. This is so sharp it no longer looks like feathers, but it's a look a lot of people here seem to prefer.
fergmark wrote:
Feathers are soft. This is so sharp it no longer looks like feathers, but it's a look a lot of people here seem to prefer.
You make valid points. I was just seeing how far I could push the sharping tools on this photo. I have other hummingbird photos that I like much more. Thank you for your thoughtful comments.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.