juan_uy wrote:
Maybe being a more "local" attraction makes less tourist from afar there and locals feel that a cell phone is just enough fortheir snapshots/memories?
I do not agree with this. Several years have passed since a cell phone has been marketed as a "phone", and probably in most under-30 users the use of the "phone" features is under 5% of the time if not less (I would even increase the age range to several more years).
Check all the marketing campaigns for top of the line cell phones of the last several years and almost all of them (if not all) will make more emphasis on the cameras capabilities (and associated software tricks) than it's "phone" capabilities
Maybe being a more "local" attraction ma... (
show quote)
[Semi-off-topic RANT follows:]
The smartphone is LEAST of all a phone, and MOST of all a general purpose computer in your pocket! And it is certainly true that the camera is among the most-used features on a smartphone.
In the beginning, mid-1800s, there were clunky view cameras with poisonous wet plates.
Soon, around the turn of the 20th century, there were the Kodak roll film cameras.
Then came many other roll film cameras, and 35mm rangefinders. Fixed exposure, fixed focus box cameras were popular among the general public.
Next came the SLR, and the "point-and-shoot" film cameras. Automation soon made those easier to use, but photography was still too damned complex and expensive for many.
Various cartridge film cameras came along in the 1960s (Instamatic 126), 1980s (Instamatic 110), and 1990s (the APS system).
In 1984, we got the Macintosh. Later, along came Windows.
In 1985, we got the Laserwriter and PageMaker software.
Around 1990, desktop scanners started to become popular.
In 1993, the World Wide Web was born. Soon came bulletin boards, and within a decade, the rise of social media — what I like to call MyBook, TwitFace, and SpaceyGram.
Enter the age of practical digital cameras, in the late 1990s.
By 2005, millions of digital cameras had been sold. Film and scanner sales were on the decline. Consumers wanted to put their images online!
The iPhone — and then Android — were the tipping point. Camera phones went from pitiful in the mid-2000s to AMAZING in 2019. Suddenly, it no longer made sense for non-photographers to carry a second device!
WHY DOES ALL THIS HISTORY MATTER?
I have this theory that the vast number of SLRs, dSLRs, and both film and digital point-and-shoot cameras were sold, simply because that's how you had to get better than average snapshots prior to around 2010. But once folks discovered they could do 50 to 100 tasks with one device in their pockets, it was inevitable that "real" camera sales would tank.
First went the point-and-shoot cameras, because the smartphone can do MOST of what those did. Now, we are seeing folks using smartphones UNLESS they need to be intentional about their photography (meaning, they plan an advanced photo assignment).
Additionally, many folks already have a perfectly good digital camera system that meets their needs. So the market for new cameras and lenses must be for truly NEW cameras and lenses (i.e.; mirrorless).
So now, we are down to mostly the hard core hobbyists, enthusiasts, and pros buying new gear.
The "convergence" of all media is fairly mature. The smartphone represents the best combination of text, photography, video, audio, telecommunications, GPS, and personal organization, because it is totally portable. It's like a Swiss Army Knife — It does most of what you need, in a pinch! Need more? Then you need an interchangeable lens camera, video camera, computer, digital audio recorder...
It has been said that "good enough" is the enemy of greatness. THAT is why we carry smartphones.