Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
The "Experimenting Phase" Is Over.
Page <prev 2 of 2
Aug 2, 2019 09:54:07   #
rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
 
Bokehen wrote:
Good question and one I can answer for myself as others might not see the logic.

1) I have an issue with the protruding lenses on any of the Zoom lenses. Not only does the lenses element stick way out away from the main lenses housing, the lens focusing element also protrudes out too far out in my opinion.

2) In order to save weight and make money, Canon and other manufactures have turned to plastics lenses. I do not care for plastics form my past experiences. dropping a plastic lens with the element pulled forward can cause trouble.

3) The EF-M lenses are cheap just don't like them.

The other day my wife sent me a text from her work place. They have a market place that she checks routinely. She thought of me, because the fellow was selling 4 lenses 2 camera bodies and a number of filters. The trouble. I don't care for zoom or multi range lenses he had. Sure it would have been a great lens or lenses to have, I just don't want to take that chance in dropping these cheaply made plastic lenses.

Although I'm going for strictly prime lenses, it's not without hindrances. One limits or forces them self to get closer or angle their shot more carefully because they don't have or use the multi range zoom type lens. This always something for anyone wanting to make the jump from those plastic multi range lenses to a fix or prime lenses. One has to know what they're getting into and the limitations of these prime lenses. I feel I've confident enough to have been around the block enough to know what lenses work best for me.
Good question and one I can answer for myself as o... (show quote)

These days I use Pentax, but I used Canon 1995-2015. I've heard a lot of complaints from Pentax users about "plastic lenses" but I never had an issue from Canon's use of space-age materials - not even from"plastic mounts" but it's your money and you get to choose how to spend it.

Reply
Aug 2, 2019 09:54:47   #
Brokenland
 
@rjaywallace This one's for you. Seeing how you asked me several months ago about the bokeh within this image.


Reply
Aug 2, 2019 09:57:22   #
Brokenland
 
rehess wrote:
I am sorry to hear that. I will pray for your health and comfort.


@rehess Sympathy is not necessary. we all have hindrances or limitations and our images should speak for themselves.

Reply
 
 
Aug 2, 2019 14:45:03   #
Brokenland
 
Here's the Latest:

Just got a confirmation email from Canon saying my lens has been shipped and should arrive 3-7 days. No movement from Amazon on the adapter & filter.

I've alloted myself 400.00 for a new lens and felt I wasn't given too many options. I just knew that I needed something around the 100mm range. I thought for the time being I'd have to settle for the 60mm EF-S lens mounted on the Fotodiox adapter (96mm) on my M6 camera.



But while at the Canon refurb site, I noticed that for just $24.00 more I could get that 100mm lenses I actually wanted.



Mind you my camera, 50mm lens have all been refurbished and I've not had any issues with them. So in a few days everything should arrive around the same time next week.

Before I get flack from anyone about why I selected the 100mm lens, it was my best option and my next move. After a while, I'm going to purchase another lens, but it's unclear if I'll go up in mm or down. We'll all have to see together when I approach that crossroad.

Reply
Aug 2, 2019 14:52:48   #
rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
 
Bokehen wrote:
@rehess Sympathy is not necessary. we all have hindrances or limitations and our images should speak for themselves.

Some of us try to be considerate of each other.

Reply
Aug 3, 2019 07:56:28   #
Stephan G
 
rehess wrote:
Some of us try to be considerate of each other.


In some places, it is called "having empathy".

Reply
Aug 3, 2019 10:31:33   #
Blair Shaw Jr Loc: Dunnellon,Florida
 
Nice work guy and thanks for the back story of your injury as it makes clear why you shoot various camera styles in your past works. Many of us suffer from age-related or accident-involved conditions and have had to make allowances for them but the industry has blessed us with modern technology that is quickly overtaking these bumps in the road and if we hang around long enough might actually have a nice surprise waiting ahead.

Thanks for you updates and keep on shootin !

Reply
 
 
Aug 3, 2019 14:56:18   #
AirWalter Loc: Tipp City, Ohio
 
rjaywallace wrote:
I like your low-light “Valley Forge” shot very much. Am guessing your first single posted images were moved to the UHH Photo Gallery. That is in keeping with the published policies of UHH. I would encourage you to shoot with the M6 as frequently as possible in order to grow with the experience gained. I myself am severely disabled and was recently told my remaining life will be shortened by cancer. Good luck and best wishes to you.


Very sorry to hear about your health problem 'RJ". I lost My Wife to cancer; You are in my thoughts and prayers.

Reply
Aug 5, 2019 13:45:17   #
Brokenland
 
Operation: New (Refurbished) Canon 100mm Lens delivered Successfully moments ago. Now waiting for the new Fotodiox EF-M Adapter & B+W Polarization Filter via Amazon. These items should arrive by the end of the week.

Inspecting the lens, I did notice some slight wear and replaced parts. but over all the lens is heavy or sturdy. I open the back porch door and took a shot of the wall with the 50mm lens then 100mm lens. Both image are not worth posting. But the differences are noticeable. This will allow me to take a few more close up and landscape shots while on our 25th anniversary trip this fall and before anyone comments about "100mm is the wrong lens for landscaping etc" We all do things differently. The 100mm was the next lens with more to follow over time. I just needed something with a bit more power and distance to take along on our trip.

One thing I did notice about the lens, is that the main glass was smudged. Out came the microfiber towel and cleaned it right up.

As for those who have responded to this thread.. it was going in the wrong direction. I merely wanted to share a few back details about what most of us are dealing with. From this point on, or I may just create a photo thread devoted to new images with the 100mm & Polarization filter when it arrives. Thanks for the comments.



Reply
Aug 5, 2019 13:50:41   #
AirWalter Loc: Tipp City, Ohio
 
Bokehen wrote:
Operation: New (Refurbished) Canon 100mm Lens delivered Successfully moments ago. Now waiting for the new Fotodiox EF-M Adapter & B+W Polarization Filter via Amazon. These items should arrive by the end of the week.

Inspecting the lens, I did notice some slight wear and replaced parts. but over all the lens is heavy or sturdy. I open the back porch door and took a shot of the wall with the 50mm lens then 100mm lens. Both image are not worth posting. But the differences are noticeable. This will allow me to take a few more close up and landscape shots while on our 25th anniversary trip this fall and before anyone comments about "100mm is the wrong lens for landscaping etc" We all do things differently. The 100mm was the next lens with more to follow over time. I just needed something with a bit more power and distance to take along on our trip.

One thing I did notice about the lens, is that the main glass was smudged. Out came the microfiber towel and cleaned it right up.

As for those who have responded to this thread.. it was going in the wrong direction. I merely wanted to share a few back details about what most of us are dealing with. From this point on, or I may just create a photo thread devoted to new images with the 100mm & Polarization filter when it arrives. Thanks for the comments.
Operation: New (Refurbished) Canon 100mm Lens deli... (show quote)


Looks like a beauty! Hope you get many great images with it.



Reply
Aug 7, 2019 12:17:37   #
Brokenland
 
Update:

The Fotodiox EF to EF-M adapter & B+W polarization filter just arrived. I wasn't worried about the Fotodiox adapter, however, it looked over the B+W filter with a fine tooth comb. Although the filter arrived in a black box which could have been the first sign that this filter wasn't real, because it typically would have arrived in blue packaging.

The next area to check was the URL on the pack of the packaging.. if one noticed spaces within the URL this was another tell tell sign something wasn't right. But that's 2 down (successful) and a few more inspections to go. This time around I took my eye loop and inspected the filter's markings. The filter has weight or is heavily made. I was really scrutinizing this filter. The last test prove this is the real deal.

If you decide to order a filter like this, check all the areas i mentioned above.. with one last test to performer. Placing the filter on the new 100mm lens carefully turning the filter as to make sure one doesn't cross thread the filter. One doesn't need to force the filter on tight, just turn until the filter's threaded area doesn't turn anymore.

Removing the cap, I stood in front of the computer screen and rotated the filter's out ring while the camera was on.. I reached a point where the window icon on my screen were not noticed and the filter went nearly dark, a small rotation counter clockwise brighten everything back to normal lighting conditions.

Again, here's the short list of things you should look for when ordering and testing new filters:

1) Check the packaging make sure it's consistent with current real packaging.
2) Check for date codes or errors within the text on the packaging.
3) Check how heavy the filter is suppose to be. Companies like B+W are manufactured to the highest quality and it will show in the workmanship.
4) Do not over tighten the filter onto the lens when checking. If there is a mistake one missed, it would be hard to remove the filter thereafter.
5) Lastly, once the filter has been mounted on the lens, focus on your computer screen and slowly rotate the filter while your camera is on. One should see the filter go from light to dark.

Reply
 
 
Aug 8, 2019 12:16:27   #
Brokenland
 
After getting the 58mm B+W polarization filter and testing on my camera, I'm just not convinced that this filter is legit or is offering a suitable difference while taking pictures. I've tried testing the filter on the camera this afternoon out the back door. Shooting in several directions, and rotating the filter several times while in multiple directions. I located two images which shows some slight change in the blue sky but is this enough to warrant spending nearly $60.00 for a filter I'm not convinced is legit.



Image 1: With the filter


Image 2: Without the filter.

In order to achieve the darker 1st image, I learn that the "B+W" text when turned to the top of the filter while on the camera represents the darkest position. Anything before or after that point the filter is none existent.

Update:

You know when you get that feeling something isn't right. It's a gut feeling almost like you hate to admit it. When I get these types of feelings.. I typically end up sending the items back.. I've just requested a return label from Amazon and I'll resending this filter back. Just not convinced its legit.

Reply
Aug 8, 2019 19:04:42   #
Brokenland
 
Update:

Here's what I just discovered and thought it best to post this in order to tell and show others what not to do. First of all the B+W filter is a nice filter, but the wrong one for my M6. According to several very informative sites, I needed what is known as "CPL" circular polarization filter. The B+W is not listed as a CPL therefore it wouldn't & didn't work with my camera.

Although the images above show some slight darkening to the first image.. the filter could not reach it's full potential. One thing I notice while using the B+W on my 100mm lens is that the "sweet spot" was only in one place. In other words, when turning it went from bright to shaded without any sort of graduation. which left 80% of the filter unusable.

So don't make the mistake I just did. If you have a digital camera and use auto focus (like I have to) the B+W circular polarization filter doesn't work. Make sure when you purchase a polarization filter it's listed as a "CPL".

I've packaged up the filter and once it's been credited back to my amazon account, I'll make the right selection on what filter I should have purchased in the first place.

Reply
Aug 19, 2019 10:18:19   #
Brokenland
 
Here's the latest.

After returning the questionable B+W filter, I then purchased the Gobe Polarization filter from Amazon. A few days alter the filter arrived in a very earth friendly package. Over the weekend we drove to eastern shore of Maryland where I set out to test the Gobe filter. But with arthritic hands, I found it to be too difficult to rotate the outer ring.

Discouraged, I contacted Gobe and just got work back from them. The Gobe spokes person said: "based on what you're wanting to do, the CPl filter would not be best suited for this. Instead the Graduation/gradual ND filter would be a better selection" So I've requested another return call tag via Amazon and back the Gobe filter will go.

Now knowing that either the Polarization filter is too difficult to master with these hands.. I realize that a square drop in would be best suited for what I'm needing. However because of limited funds, I'll have to settle for a circular graduation ND filter for the time being. Currently there's only 2 selections on the Amazon site and I'll probably end up going with the Tiffen.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.