Wow, I'd learned a lot during this discussion.
I'm considering the old Nikon 105mm 2.8 D wich can be purchased for around $200 in good condition.
What do you guys think about that?
Augie
augieg27 wrote:
Wow, I'd learned a lot during this discussion.
I'm considering the old Nikon 105mm 2.8 D wich can be purchased for around $200 in good condition.
What do you guys think about that?
Augie
If it is from a trusted vendor such as B&H or KEH, you cannot go wrong. Super lens! Get the best condition you can find, a lot of them have seen hard pro use.
augieg27 wrote:
Wow, I'd learned a lot during this discussion.
I'm considering the old Nikon 105mm 2.8 D wich can be purchased for around $200 in good condition.
What do you guys think about that?
Augie
That is one of the three lenses I purchased with my first Nikon, an F100. I still have it, and use it. It is an AF Nikkor which means for auto focus the body needs to have the focus motor.
---
Chris T
Loc: from England across the pond to New England
Actually, RWR … no, it won't!!!
The question was - to YOU - how would YOU define - what has been termed on UHH - "D" Lenses …
Chris T
Loc: from England across the pond to New England
augieg27 wrote:
Wow, I'd learned a lot during this discussion.
I'm considering the old Nikon 105mm 2.8 D wich can be purchased for around $200 in good condition.
What do you guys think about that?
Augie
Augie - hate to bang an old drum … but D lenses won't work on the D5500 …
Nikon entry-level cameras - such as the D3000 series, and D5000 series - are missing a screw which engages with the AF in older lenses. These cameras REQUIRE modern lenses, I'm afraid …
I discovered the problem, some years back, after I bought a couple of Tokina lenses, and found, to my dismay - they would not AF with my D3200. So, that sent me out looking for a ProSumer camera. Found a used D90, for a pittance - but had to send it back, at the end of the trial period. Its replacement was a Refurb D7000 - which has served me well. It will take just about any Nikkor lens I try on it … but my D3200, D5300 and D5500 - will NOT, unfortunately ….
Chris T wrote:
Actually, RWR … no, it won't!!!
The question was - to YOU - how would YOU define - what has been termed on UHH - "D" Lenses …
If I didn’t already know, I would Google “Lens Designations” for the brand in question and see what the “D” stands for.
Chris T
Loc: from England across the pond to New England
RWR wrote:
If I didn’t already know, I would Google “Lens Designations” for the brand in question and see what the “D” stands for.
RWR - I'm pretty sure the "D" assignation is applied to ALL lenses of this type - be they Nikon, Sigma, Tamron or Tokina ….
Here's some of the incongruities - a Bing Search revealed -
Sigma 70-200mm F/2.8 APO D EX HSM (N90S & Later) …
$399.00
KEH Camera
---------------
D-Type NIKKOR Lenses A D-type lens relays subject-to-camera-distance information to Nikon D-SLRs that feature 3D Color Matrix Metering (all versions), 3D Matrix Metering, 3D Multi-Sensor Balanced Fill-Flash and i-TTL Balanced Fill-Flash. Many D-Type lenses have an aperture control ring and can be used on older Nikon SLR cameras that allow for manual control of the aperture, as well as on D-SLRs—especially useful for adjusting aperture while recording D-Movies on higher end models.
The Nikon Nikkor AF-D series“Nikonists” still highly appreciate the AF-D-series lenses, all of which appeared in 1994. (Nikon usually adds the “D” after the aperture, as in “50mm f/1.4D AF,” rather than “50mm f/1.4 AF-D,” but both refer to the same lenses.)
May 12, 2014 · The D in model designations indicates that the lens can tell the camera the distance the focus is set to. This makes metering a little easier. At some point Nikon started building lenses that are no longer AI-S compatible. These are lenses with G in the name. Most notably, G lenses lack an aperture ring. All G lenses are also D lenses.
Chris T wrote:
RWR - I'm pretty sure the "D" assignation is applied to ALL lenses of this type - be they Nikon, Sigma, Tamron or Tokina ….
Open and read the links I posted and you will see that the “D” assignation does
NOT mean the same to all manufacturers.
Chris T
Loc: from England across the pond to New England
RWR wrote:
Open and read the links I posted and you will see that the “D” assignation does NOT mean the same to all manufacturers.
It really doesn't matter whether it does or it doesn't, RWR …
The fact is - it ALL comes OUT to be the same …
There IS a class of lenses, be they Nikon, or Third-Party - which just will NOT AF with entry-level DX bodies!
Chris T wrote:
Augie - hate to bang an old drum … but D lenses won't work on the D5500 …
Wrong again CT! When will you stop spreading false information?
Some D lenses won't and some will. The D has nothing to do with it. I own 3 "D" lenses that also happen to be AF-S
17-35 F/2.8, 300 F/4.0, and 500 F/4.0. There are others.
Some years ago I highjacked my ex-son-in-law's Sigma 105 macro w. circular lens strobe, as a humming bird took up nesting approximately 20 feet from our front window. With a step ladder in the front room (my wife loved it) I was able to get some shots of this family for the approximate 30 days before leaving the nest. I considered it my privilege to be able to eve drop in this manner and it is one of my fondest memories. When my grandsons were asked what we should call the baby hummers, one said "Ying and Yang grandpa!" The second lad not to be outdone piped up " Yaa but mommy should be called Mrs. Tiddlebutt"; go figure.
Blurryeyed wrote:
What so many people just don't seem to understand is that it is almost impossible to go wrong with any macro lens because they are flat plane and so close focusing. When you enlarge anything on your sensor to 1:1 reproduction any lens just about will look great, to prove my point, here is an image of a honey bee taken with an old 28mm Minolta Celtic reversed onto tubes, it was their cheap line back in the day....
As far as the Sigma.... It is a fine lens, read a review, there is no real need to pay the added expense of an OEM when looking at Macro lenses, they are all good.
https://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Sigma-105mm-f-2.8-EX-DG-OS-HSM-Macro-Lens-Review.aspxWhat so many people just don't seem to understand ... (
show quote)
I bee liking that photo!!! Really nice and sharp
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.