Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
U.S. women's team snub of Christian player roils soccer
Page <<first <prev 3 of 7 next> last>>
Jul 11, 2019 20:43:28   #
idaholover Loc: Nampa ID
 
Frank T wrote:
So then you support Kaepernick also?


Huh? WTF does that have to do with anything. And, no I don't. She probably stands for the National Anthem.

Reply
Jul 11, 2019 20:57:43   #
Los-Angeles-Shooter Loc: Los Angeles
 
Why in blazes should athletes be forced to support causes they don't agree with? Have these f*****t members of the soccer team never heard of the 1st Amendment?

Reply
Jul 11, 2019 20:59:23   #
Los-Angeles-Shooter Loc: Los Angeles
 
Rapinhoe is one of the worst. Disses the USA, doesn't behave during the national anthem. And a guttermouth as well.

Reply
 
 
Jul 11, 2019 21:00:49   #
soba1 Loc: Somewhere In So Ca
 
btbg wrote:
You are mistaken. She chose not to wear a rainbow p***e uniform in one match. The coaching staff chose to leave her off of future teams.

Sport is supposed to be non-political, so the team had no business wearing a rainbow p***e jersey in the first place. It is a team representing our nation, not L**T rights. They were wrong and she stood up for what she believed in. Since then they have punished her for her stance.

AT no time has she ever said anything critical of the individuals on the team. She has merely stated that she believes in the Bible and that she could not with a clear conscious wear a uniform that stood for something she does not believe in.

If you bothered to read the entire article her professional team, which also has lesbians on it support her and says that she is always kind and not critical of them. She just doesn't want their lifestyle forced on her.

Tolerance is a two way street. Something that the left doesn't seem to understand. You are h********c if you believe the Bible according to the left, but also according to the left it is ok to call Christians vile names and discriminate against them because they don't conform to the worldview of the left.

That is not tolerance.
You are mistaken. She chose not to wear a rainbow ... (show quote)


Nope a mild form of Christian persecution.
Kaepernick does not stand for the black community, he stands for himself.
Comparing Kaepernick to this you lady is comparing apples to oranges

Reply
Jul 11, 2019 22:36:09   #
btbg
 
Frank T wrote:
So then you support Kaepernick also?


Partially. You missed a key difference however. Kaepernick made a public display and to many disrespected the American f**g.

That is not the same as what happened here. The perceived disrespect in the soccer case was refusing to wear a uniform that shouldn't have even existed.

In Kaepernick's case he is protesting something that isn't even true. In fact, his ability to make millions even when not under NFL contract is proof that r****m is not keeping b****s down or causing the problems with police that he is protesting.

I absolutely defend Kaepernick's right to say what he believes. I don't however agree with his views. And once again if you look at my post I clearly stated that sports are supposed to be non political.

Had Kaepernick done his protest at press conferences and gone to meet with heads of law enforcement agencies to make his point I would have been entirely ok with what he was doing despite not agreeing with his basic premise.

The key to this whole dispute is that sports are supposed to be non political. Athletes do not need to be non political, but they should save it for off the field, which is why the U.S. team was absolutely wrong to wear the rainbow uniforms and Kaepernick was wrong to make his protest during games.

Still with all of that said if he can prove that he was blackballed from the NFL solely because of his political stance I would say that was wrong. The thing is I don't believe that is the case because others who have made the same political statement still have jobs.

Also it is pretty tough to feel sorry for someone who can make millions endorsing a product that he doesn't even use. And the deal with the Betsy Ross shoes kind of k**ls all of his credibility.

Reply
Jul 11, 2019 22:40:42   #
soba1 Loc: Somewhere In So Ca
 
btbg wrote:
Partially. You missed a key difference however. Kaepernick made a public display and to many disrespected the American f**g.

That is not the same as what happened here. The perceived disrespect in the soccer case was refusing to wear a uniform that shouldn't have even existed.

In Kaepernick's case he is protesting something that isn't even true. In fact, his ability to make millions even when not under NFL contract is proof that r****m is not keeping b****s down or causing the problems with police that he is protesting.

I absolutely defend Kaepernick's right to say what he believes. I don't however agree with his views. And once again if you look at my post I clearly stated that sports are supposed to be non political.

Had Kaepernick done his protest at press conferences and gone to meet with heads of law enforcement agencies to make his point I would have been entirely ok with what he was doing despite not agreeing with his basic premise.

The key to this whole dispute is that sports are supposed to be non political. Athletes do not need to be non political, but they should save it for off the field, which is why the U.S. team was absolutely wrong to wear the rainbow uniforms and Kaepernick was wrong to make his protest during games.

Still with all of that said if he can prove that he was blackballed from the NFL solely because of his political stance I would say that was wrong. The thing is I don't believe that is the case because others who have made the same political statement still have jobs.

Also it is pretty tough to feel sorry for someone who can make millions endorsing a product that he doesn't even use. And the deal with the Betsy Ross shoes kind of k**ls all of his credibility.
Partially. You missed a key difference however. Ka... (show quote)



Reply
Jul 11, 2019 22:42:36   #
Rose42
 
btbg wrote:
Partially. You missed a key difference however. Kaepernick made a public display and to many disrespected the American f**g.

That is not the same as what happened here. The perceived disrespect in the soccer case was refusing to wear a uniform that shouldn't have even existed.

In Kaepernick's case he is protesting something that isn't even true. In fact, his ability to make millions even when not under NFL contract is proof that r****m is not keeping b****s down or causing the problems with police that he is protesting.

I absolutely defend Kaepernick's right to say what he believes. I don't however agree with his views. And once again if you look at my post I clearly stated that sports are supposed to be non political.

Had Kaepernick done his protest at press conferences and gone to meet with heads of law enforcement agencies to make his point I would have been entirely ok with what he was doing despite not agreeing with his basic premise.

The key to this whole dispute is that sports are supposed to be non political. Athletes do not need to be non political, but they should save it for off the field, which is why the U.S. team was absolutely wrong to wear the rainbow uniforms and Kaepernick was wrong to make his protest during games.

Still with all of that said if he can prove that he was blackballed from the NFL solely because of his political stance I would say that was wrong. The thing is I don't believe that is the case because others who have made the same political statement still have jobs.

Also it is pretty tough to feel sorry for someone who can make millions endorsing a product that he doesn't even use. And the deal with the Betsy Ross shoes kind of k**ls all of his credibility.
Partially. You missed a key difference however. Ka... (show quote)


Well put.

Reply
 
 
Jul 12, 2019 07:12:49   #
shagbat Loc: London
 
amyinsparta wrote:
Considering her beliefs, would she have been happy on the team? It appears she made her position known in 2015. What exactly is your purpose in posting this article? All I know is I get irritated at all the Mormons and fundamentalists of one sort or another, ringing my doorbell on a regular basis, trying to 'instruct' me on what to believe. But I have never had a homosexual of any sort ringing my doorbell or preaching downtown on the corner, trying to make me like them. Live and let live. "Love one another."
Considering her beliefs, would she have been happy... (show quote)


Spot on!

Reply
Jul 12, 2019 09:48:10   #
Frank T Loc: New York, NY
 
Listen guys. You need to take the emotion out of this thing. If you're part of a team and the team decides to do something, then you are left with two choices after all the debate is done. One, go along with your team. Two, leave the team.
She chose to break from the team. Indeed, a brave stand and act but it's not something I'm going to los any sleep over.

Reply
Jul 12, 2019 10:06:15   #
yhtomit Loc: Port Land. Oregon
 
idaholover wrote:
That team politicized themselves and exhibited extreme intolerance and total lack of class in their celebration. If the New England Patriots had acted like that they been shunned. Here's a tip for ya....put up a no soliciting sign.

BTW.."Love one another." tell that to the lesbians. Oh ya, I guess they do, only just each other. The sound of me spitting.


πŸ‘πŸΌπŸ‘πŸΌπŸ‘πŸΌπŸ‘πŸΌπŸ‘πŸΌ

Reply
Jul 12, 2019 10:25:25   #
dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho
 
amyinsparta wrote:
Considering her beliefs, would she have been happy on the team? It appears she made her position known in 2015. What exactly is your purpose in posting this article? All I know is I get irritated at all the Mormons and fundamentalists of one sort or another, ringing my doorbell on a regular basis, trying to 'instruct' me on what to believe. But I have never had a homosexual of any sort ringing my doorbell or preaching downtown on the corner, trying to make me like them. Live and let live. "Love one another."
Considering her beliefs, would she have been happy... (show quote)


Amy do you not have the ability to simply tell those who knock on your door that you have no interest in their religion/philosophy? I used to have these people knock on my door. I politely told them I have no interest and now nobody comes.

As for homosexuals, I have never had one knocking on my door nor a heterosexual either soliciting anything. Your analogy doesn't seem to make sense in that regard. But I do notice the gay p***e f**g being pushed everywhere and at any time. What it represents is nothing but a sexual preference of one group. I have no problem with that sexual preference as long as it isn't shoved down my throat. I have gay friends and went to a wedding of two men that I call close friends. But these two men keep their sexual preference in their bedroom/house where it belongs.

My wife and I do not parade naked down the streets of San Francisco or other cities to promote our heterosexuality. It isn't really necessary is it? Why do Liberals go all gaga over homosexuality and child perversion? Why do they force this s**t on the rest of us. Personally I don't care if people screw sheep so long as I am not going to eat that sheep later on. But don't push sexuality on the rest of us. Do you not get that? Are you really open to naked people or people wearing whips and chains or other signs of d*****t sex? Are you for children seeing this crap?

Dennis

Reply
 
 
Jul 12, 2019 10:26:22   #
dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho
 
Frank T wrote:
She made a choice.
Case closed


No Frank. She was forced to make a choice. Big difference. Once again you are WRONG...

Dennis

Reply
Jul 12, 2019 10:27:05   #
dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho
 
Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:
THEY made a choice: vile abuse and discrimination against non-lesbians and Christians.




I saw on the news yesterday that Megan Rapinoe is willing to talk to anyone EXCEPT those who disagree with her. That is the way Liberals are these days. If you agree with them then they will listen to you. If you do not agree then it is H**E speech and must be shut down, the First Amendment be damned.

Dennis

Reply
Jul 12, 2019 10:31:21   #
dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho
 
Frank T wrote:
She chose not to play on the team. Because of her own beliefs.

It was her choice. No o e elses.


Frank do you honestly think someone should be forced to play on a team that exposes a sexual preference? Can't sports players play for the sport without having to agree to a specific sexual preference that is not your preference?

Dennis

Reply
Jul 12, 2019 11:08:30   #
Frank T Loc: New York, NY
 
dennis2146 wrote:
No Frank. She was forced to make a choice. Big difference. Once again you are WRONG...

Dennis


Life is tough Dennis. We're all forced to make choices. For instance, Trump could have been drafted but he chose to f**e bone spurs. That was a choice, just like she made. Looking back she probably could have negotiated something but her blind faith in the invisible sky man wouldn't allow that.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 7 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.