Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Pentax 55-300mm
Jul 10, 2019 22:54:14   #
jkfrankum
 
Is the new 55-300mm Pentax HD PLM lens worth the increased cost over the Pentax 55-300mm HD lens? Also, If i am looking for a good wide angle lens for photos of the stars, please provide any suggestions.

Reply
Jul 11, 2019 07:28:39   #
camerapapi Loc: Miami, Fl.
 
Pentax makes a 14mm f2.8 and a 20-40 f2.8-4 that could help you make astrophotography. I am not a Pentax user but the f2.8 aperture looks like a good aperture to have in a lens for astrophotography. f1.8 is not that super brighter compared to the f2.8 and compensation for the aperture can be done using a higher ISO setting in camera. I have used my 12-24 f4 AF-S Nikon lens for astrophotography without issues.

Reply
Jul 11, 2019 07:37:15   #
Nosaj Loc: Sarasota, Florida
 
jkfrankum wrote:
Is the new 55-300mm Pentax HD PLM lens worth the increased cost over the Pentax 55-300mm HD lens? Also, If i am looking for a good wide angle lens for photos of the stars, please provide any suggestions.


Good question. I have the older version and would like to hear about the newer 55-300mm lens.

Reply
 
 
Jul 11, 2019 08:26:38   #
jkfrankum
 
Nosaj wrote:
Good question. I have the older version and would like to hear about the newer 55-300mm lens.


What is your thoughts on the older version?

Reply
Jul 11, 2019 08:36:06   #
mtcoothaman Loc: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
 
I have the older version but I recollect seeing comments that the newer PLM version is better -perhaps on the Pentax Forum site. Be careful as the PLM may not work on some older cameras. (I have just checked the PF site and you need a 2013 or later camera )

Reply
Jul 11, 2019 09:51:41   #
alamodoso
 
https://www.pentaxforums.com/lensreviews/hd-pentax-da-55-300mm-f45-63-ed-plm-wr-re.html

Reply
Jul 11, 2019 09:52:13   #
alamodoso
 
https://www.pentaxforums.com/lensreviews/hd-pentax-da-55-300mm-f45-63-ed-plm-wr-re.html

Reply
 
 
Jul 11, 2019 10:02:55   #
drobvit Loc: Southern NV
 
jkfrankum wrote:
Is the new 55-300mm Pentax HD PLM lens worth the increased cost over the Pentax 55-300mm HD lens? Also, If i am looking for a good wide angle lens for photos of the stars, please provide any suggestions.


You didn't mention which camera. As far as wides, Rokinon has FFs in 14 f/2.8 (115deg) and a 20 f/1.8 (94deg). Good reviews on B&H. Low priced. Personally, I would go with the 20.

Reply
Jul 11, 2019 12:10:17   #
jkfrankum
 
drobvit wrote:
You didn't mention which camera. As far as wides, Rokinon has FFs in 14 f/2.8 (115deg) and a 20 f/1.8 (94deg). Good reviews on B&H. Low priced. Personally, I would go with the 20.


Pentax k-70

Reply
Jul 11, 2019 14:53:10   #
drobvit Loc: Southern NV
 
jkfrankum wrote:
Pentax k-70

The 14 f/2.8 will give approx 90deg/21mm equiv. on your K-70. $249.

Reply
Jul 11, 2019 15:56:12   #
rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
 
jkfrankum wrote:
Is the new 55-300mm Pentax HD PLM lens worth the increased cost over the Pentax 55-300mm HD lens?
jkfrankum wrote:
Pentax k-70
The PLM variant will be a real addition to your kit. It focuses faster and quieter than its predecessor - and, yes, it will work with a K-70.

Incidentally, the question of compatibility results from Pentax's developing the KAF4 mount, which uses an electronic link, instead of a mechanical link, to control the aperture.

Reply
 
 
Jul 11, 2019 19:09:11   #
drobvit Loc: Southern NV
 
drobvit wrote:
The 14 f/2.8 will give approx 90deg/21mm equiv. on your K-70. $249.


$549 not $249

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.