Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
Scenes from Joshua Tree NP
Page 1 of 2 next>
Jul 1, 2019 05:58:26   #
dhroberts Loc: Boston, MA, USA
 
This park is remarkable for the variety of its scenery.

Cholla Garden
Cholla Garden...
(Download)

Joshua Trees at Sunset
Joshua Trees at Sunset...
(Download)

Skull Rock
Skull Rock...
(Download)

Reply
Jul 1, 2019 06:20:11   #
nimbushopper Loc: Tampa, FL
 

Reply
Jul 1, 2019 07:24:33   #
jaymatt Loc: Alexandria, Indiana
 
Nice ones.

Reply
 
 
Jul 1, 2019 08:06:07   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 

Love the conehead rock.

Reply
Jul 1, 2019 08:09:46   #
Tom DePuy Loc: Waxhaw, N.C.
 
Nice shots...
Just watched 60 Minutes Sunday night and they had a story on the Joshua Tree National Park, rather interesting

Reply
Jul 1, 2019 11:40:27   #
kpmac Loc: Ragley, La
 
A very nice set.

Reply
Jul 1, 2019 14:52:18   #
fbeaston Loc: Vermont
 
A beautiful series. Thanks for sharing.

Reply
 
 
Jul 2, 2019 05:41:47   #
J-SPEIGHT Loc: Akron, Ohio
 
dhroberts wrote:
This park is remarkable for the variety of its scenery.


Nice set of images.

Reply
Jul 2, 2019 06:08:41   #
tcthome Loc: NJ
 
Longshadow wrote:

Love the conehead rock.



Reply
Jul 2, 2019 06:08:54   #
tcthome Loc: NJ
 
Nice set!

Reply
Jul 2, 2019 12:46:45   #
spks917
 
Hi there, Love your photos! I currently use a bridge camera-mostly for birding (nikon p900). Since I have not used a dslr and the endless variety of lenses (it seems), would you share what you shot these with? And did you use the same lens for each photo?

I ask because I am investigating different dslrs and what I would like to shoot. The P900 is great for birding and casual posts on FBook, but I'd like to get better/clearer shots for perhaps macro (flowers/rocks/butterflies) or landscape shots. Which, as I read, are two different types of lenses.

Only if you have time to respond. I see many good photos posted here, but not as many that make me go "wow!".

Reply
 
 
Jul 2, 2019 12:48:01   #
Curmudgeon Loc: SE Arizona
 
Great shots all, but I like the Teddy Bear Cholla best.

Reply
Jul 2, 2019 13:23:13   #
dhroberts Loc: Boston, MA, USA
 
spks917 wrote:
Hi there, Love your photos! I currently use a bridge camera-mostly for birding (nikon p900). Since I have not used a dslr and the endless variety of lenses (it seems), would you share what you shot these with? And did you use the same lens for each photo?

I ask because I am investigating different dslrs and what I would like to shoot. The P900 is great for birding and casual posts on FBook, but I'd like to get better/clearer shots for perhaps macro (flowers/rocks/butterflies) or landscape shots. Which, as I read, are two different types of lenses.

Only if you have time to respond. I see many good photos posted here, but not as many that make me go "wow!".
Hi there, Love your photos! I currently use a bri... (show quote)


Hi! Thanks for the comments on the photos. All three were taken in 2008 with a Nikon D300. The cholla was taken with a 60mm f/2.8D Nikon micro lens (their term for their macro lenses), the other two with a 17-55/2.8 DX Nikon lens (discontinued I imagine). The closest you could come today to that latter combination is the Nikon D500 DSLR with 16-80mm Lens, which is currently on sale for (only) $2100.

On the other hand, I have sold my Nikon DSLRs and replaced them with a new Nikon Z7 mirrorless camera with the 24-70 /4 and 14-30 f/4 Z-mount lenses. This is a very compact system, and produces wonderful images. You can read all about the strengths and weaknesses of the Nikon mirrorless system on the web (or see them discussed on YouTube). I made the change because my DSLRs (D800E and D4S) and their lenses (primarily the 24-70 f/2.8 G) were getting too heavy for me to transport and use easily. I'd guess that the Z7 and its 24-70 lens weigh half of what the D800E and its 24-70 lens weighed (and seem to be half their size!). (There is also the Z6 mirrorless, which differs from the Z7 only by the pixel count of the detector (24 Mpix versus 45).)

One advantage of the Z7 & 24-70 f/4 combination is that the lens focuses a lot closer than did my old system, making it useful for pretty good close-ups. For true macro work I use my older Nikon 60mm f/2.8D or 200 mm f/4D true macro lenses on the Z7 with the FTZ adapter.

Any new camera system will be a sizable investment. I suggest that if possible you go to a camera store (or box store) and actually handle the various options. Then buy what you want through the mail from a place like B&H photo in NYC - shipping will be free and they have a way for you to avoid paying any sales tax.

Good luck with your choice, and feel free to ask me any more questions you may have.

Reply
Jul 2, 2019 13:50:23   #
MT native Loc: Big Sky Country — Montana
 
Very nice set of images. That is definitely skull rock! Thanks for sharing.

Reply
Jul 2, 2019 13:50:23   #
spks917
 
Thank you so much for your reply! I have looked at that mirrorless and think they are, ideally, the way to go - if money is not an object lol. But I will file your reply away in my "dream" folder ;)

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.