My second post of photos using both the Sony a6000 and newer Sony A7III.
The A7III is the best camera I have ever used, surpassing my two older Nikon DSLRs.
This is just another selection of pictures taken with both cameras.
By the way, Sony is great with the firmware updates. The focusing systems on these cameras are superb.
Was the valley shot with the A7iii and if so what lens did you use?
Hi! I'm a little confused as to what exactly you posted? I am a Sony guy wandering whether or not to upgrade from the A7 to either the A7II or A7III? Are all the shots from the A7III, or are some from the a6000? Because, I only see one post. Guess that's where my confusion is coming from. Are you comparing shots from the A7III to the a6000?
My crew gives the last shot 4 paws up!
SteveG wrote:
Hi! I'm a little confused as to what exactly you posted? I am a Sony guy wandering whether or not to upgrade from the A7 to either the A7II or A7III? Are all the shots from the A7III, or are some from the a6000? Because, I only see one post. Guess that's where my confusion is coming from. Are you comparing shots from the A7III to the a6000?
Ditto, I'd like to know which is which. Thanks.
The post doesn't make any sense to me as it is posted at this point. I see several shots, and I don't know what camera they are from. As stated, there's supposed to be two sets of pictures. At least that's how I read it.
I'd also like to know what lens and which pics were taken with A7III?
Very good series, Pyrran.
I think the post was about the photos. The back story about two cameras was misleading due to it being posted on this strongly equipment oriented site. We all merely assumed he was comparing cameras. If you read things carefully , he just said that his A73 is the best camera he's ever owned. He did not say why except that both his Sony's autofocus well due to firmware upgrades. He said nothing about the quality of his Sony 6000 except that since the A73 is best then, by deductive logic, the a 6000 is not best. All the photos are well exposed and properly focused. Are they works of art? Well we all have our opinions about that, They appear to be well composed but none has a signifigant impact on me. Never the less , the technical quality of all the photos indicates the admirable capability of both the camera/lens combo's. (Within the limits of resolution of a computer screen)
For what it's worth , the last 4 phots seem to have a touch more sharpness and color punch, but that could bse improved post processing
The last image of the Dog is Priceless.......he's a STAR ...no doubt !
OK I drug the photos through ImageExifViewer3.3.0. The first 4 photos (Cat through Valley) are done with the ILCE7M3 (Sony A7III), The rest came from a Sony a6000 (Stone watchtower through dog) Strangely, my view that the last 4 (Sony a6000) were more crisp, evaporated when I looked at the enlarged "download" views. At that magnification I now have an uncomfortable feeling that both cameras exceed the crispness capacity of my monitor and thus present equal detail and crispness when viewed on my monitor.
Pyrran wrote:
My second post of photos using both the Sony a6000 and newer Sony A7III.
The A7III is the best camera I have ever used, surpassing my two older Nikon DSLRs.
This is just another selection of pictures taken with both cameras.
By the way, Sony is great with the firmware updates. The focusing systems on these cameras are superb.
For those of us who can only buy one, which do you reccomend?
planepics
Loc: St. Louis burbs, but originally Chicago burbs
Next year (if I don't go on a trip somewhere) I'll probably upgrade to an a77ii or get an a99ii. I like the hand-feel of a traditional-sized camera.
The valley was shot with the a6000 using the kit normal lens at 36mm.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.