Anything I could say about being either good or lucky or both (or neither) would border on wishful thinking on my part, but about titles....

Titles aren't bad, necessarily, but too often they're either misleading, or pretentious, or hopelessly cliché. Sometimes, a few words that describe the who, where or what of an image can be helpful, but titles themselves can often be the opposite. Unless they're either very precise, or are sufficiently multi-layered that they're metaphoric and they further the intent of the image itself. An ok photo might need some verbal assistance; a good photo probably much less so. A really really good photograph? It states its title without uttering a word.

Your photograph does not need a title. It especially does not need the title you seem to be considering.

How quickly can you spot an interesting composition? To me it seems to be a numbers game. If you take enough photos, you should be able to have a few keepers. However, spotting a scene that is subject to endless interpretations doesn't happen very often.

This photo is from a hotel library in Chennai, India, taken in 2018 using a Panasonic GX8 with a 12-66 mm lens. I had been walking the hotel grounds looking for exterior shots when I walked into a small room off the main pool. As I walked in I saw a father and daughter talking off to one side. I wanted to take a picture of the pool through the window when I noticed there was a young boy sitting on the couch. My first thought was that I could not take the picture without the approval of the father but then I realized that the boys face could not be seen. The composition jumped out at me. The pose of the boy with his face hidden by his computer screen seemed to be a metaphor for what is happening to kids in the modern world. Here we are, in a third world country with history and beauty all around, and our kids are shackled to an electronic gadget.

Upon returning home and processing this photo, I wanted to find a caption that would evoke the meaning of this shot. After considerable debate, I finally decided on "Go to your room!" I am interested in your thoughts on my composition, the meaning of the photo to you and what caption would you have used? All comments are appreciated.

How quickly can you spot an interesting composition? To me it seems to be a numbers game. If you take enough photos, you should be able to have a few keepers. However, spotting a scene that is subject to endless interpretations doesn't happen very often.

This photo is from a hotel library in Chennai, India, taken in 2018 using a Panasonic GX8 with a 12-66 mm lens. I had been walking the hotel grounds looking for exterior shots when I walked into a small room off the main pool. As I walked in I saw a father and daughter talking off to one side. I wanted to take a picture of the pool through the window when I noticed there was a young boy sitting on the couch. My first thought was that I could not take the picture without the approval of the father but then I realized that the boys face could not be seen. The composition jumped out at me. The pose of the boy with his face hidden by his computer screen seemed to be a metaphor for what is happening to kids in the modern world. Here we are, in a third world country with history and beauty all around, and our kids are shackled to an electronic gadget.

Upon returning home and processing this photo, I wanted to find a caption that would evoke the meaning of this shot. After considerable debate, I finally decided on "Go to your room!" I am interested in your thoughts on my composition, the meaning of the photo to you and what caption would you have used? All comments are appreciated.