Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
16mp vs 24 mp, jpg vs raw ?
Page <prev 2 of 2
Jun 28, 2019 03:19:10   #
SuperflyTNT Loc: Manassas VA
 
Dossile wrote:
I bought a Panasonic GX9 which has 24 MP and a similar sensor to a G9 with a price and smaller body similar to the GX85. I am uncertain why you would choose a GX85 (16 MP) over a GX9 (24 MP). The cost difference is marginal. The pictures captured so far in RAW are great, the battery life better than expected and the handling with my very large hands, comfortable. Is there something that I don’t know about the two cameras? I generally shoot with the screen, but the viewfinder works great too.


I don’t think the difference between $500 and $800 is marginal, especially since the $500 for the GX85 includes two lenses.

Reply
Jun 28, 2019 09:40:33   #
Dossile
 
SuperflyTNT wrote:
I don’t think the difference between $500 and $800 is marginal, especially since the $500 for the GX85 includes two lenses.


Your right. The price has dropped another hundred from my last perusals of B&H. $150-200 is my personal cut off for newer vs older technologies. Having said that, glass is more important than MP count in my experience. This is my second Panasonic 4/3 and I decided to upgrade several years ago to higher quality glass because of the softness of the kit lenses. I know little of Sony lenses, but Olympus lenses have been of the highest quality for years. I wouldn’t throw the Olympus equivalent out of the mix. I will use the 12-60 that comes with the Gx9. I’m not sure that I would use the lenses provided as a kit with the Gx85. I would have to experiment with there sharpness.

Reply
Jun 28, 2019 09:42:56   #
BebuLamar
 
rick422a wrote:
I'm deciding between 16 MP MFT ( Lumix GX 85 or Oly M10iii) and APSC C ( Sony A6000). The samples at DP review and Imaging resource, show Sony jpeg to be sharper than the MFT. But in RAW the differences appear to be very minimal. All three cameras are about the same price, and extra lenses similar in price and size.
If sharpness is my primary goal, will 16MP RAW really be comparable to 24MP APSC RAW ? The largest prints I'll be making will be 11 x14. I don't trust my aging eyes to make the decision based on what I can see on the computer monitor.thanks.
I'm deciding between 16 MP MFT ( Lumix GX 85 or Ol... (show quote)


I would say the Sony delivers the best image quality if you test it in a controlled environment. There are other factors that make a camera better than others besides image quality. For me among the factors how the camera look is an important one.

Reply
 
 
Jul 1, 2019 10:34:24   #
dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia
 
BebuLamar wrote:
I would say the Sony delivers the best image quality if you test it in a controlled environment. There are other factors that make a camera better than others besides image quality. For me among the factors how the camera look is an important one.


Which is great, if you shoot in a controlled environment.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.