Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
What Age is Considered to be Vintage in the Photographic World?
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
Oct 4, 2019 16:23:14   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
ornault wrote:
I'd like to hear some UHH input on some or all of the following considerations:
1) In the Photographic World, is Antique the same as Vintage referring to Film Cameras and Lenses,
2) Are all Film Cameras and Lenses now considered to be Vintage, and
3) How old does a Film Camera, and its associated Lenses, need to be to be thought of as Vintage?

Thanks in Advance; I still have my first Nikon F (670xxxx) with the 50mm f/1.4 now with coating separation and stuck at around 25 foot focus from high school over half a century ago. And no, I haven't used them in decades. Though I was dragged (kicking and screaming) into the digital age, I continue to be amazed at the continuing miracles of it all...
I'd like to hear some UHH input on some or all of ... (show quote)


About an hour.

Seriously, lenses are less frequently replaced, but camera bodies have a life of about 2-3 yrs before their feature sets are superseded by genuinely better, cooler stuff. I have at least 5 lenses that have not changed much over the past 15 yrs.

Reply
Oct 4, 2019 18:26:25   #
E.L.. Shapiro Loc: Ottawa, Ontario Canada
 
It ain't wine, it's hardware!

I used to think SOME PHOTOGRAPHERS are insane, especially when they suffer a GAS attack and go out and buy stuff they don't need, and perhaps don't even know how to use, perhaps wishfully thinking "IT" will improve their photography, that is, until I met some avid CAMERA COLLECTORS- "crazy" ain't the word- try "berserk" I witnessed a guy spending $2,000. on a mint condition Vest Pocket Kodak Autographic because it had green leather covering and had not only the stylus but a few rolls of useless film with the "carbon paper" in the roll-film backing! He "needed" this camera to complete his "Autographic Collection"! For the uninitiated, it's a Kodak folder circa the 1920s, that came with a trapdoor in the back which enabled the photographer to write something on the film via a carbon-paper like stuff on the backing paper, using a stylus that was supplied with the camera and stored on a clip on the body. The writing would survive processing and washing and would impart the text, in white, on the prints. For an addition $500., the seller included an album full of prints with historical data like "Aunt Marry 1927"

Rarity counts. At one point in time, a Zeiss Contessa Nettel Tropical with red bellows went for 5 Grand on the collectors market- now you can get one for a mere $1,000.

I was never a collector. I'll admit that some old cameras induce a pang of nostalgia like the ones from the 1950s when there were still a plethora of cameras made in the U.S. and Germany, but I won't buy any. I have purchased a few big old wooden studio cameras with impressive brass lens barrels as a showpiece in my old studio- I had more space there. Theses old monsters were crafted like fine furniture with tongue and groove joinings and have character- the rest are just hardware.

"Vintage" is overused. "Circa" is better!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.