Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Quick and Dirty 2-Image Focus Stacking
Page <prev 2 of 2
Jun 4, 2019 12:30:56   #
DirtFarmer Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
 
rcarol wrote:
...4)Create a mask to the upper layer and apply a linear gradient to the mask.

The linear gradient will merge the foreground of one image with the background of the other producing a single image that is sharp from foreground to background. I realize my instructions are a bit sketchy but anyone with a working knowledge of Photoshop should be able to sort out the details for themselves. If there is sufficient interest, I could post detailed instructions.


I'm assuming that you are talking about an image where the foreground and background are clearly different areas of the photo. Foreground at the bottom of the frame and background at the top. Not all images are like that so the linear gradient technique would be limited.

I frequently take flower photos. When I have a cluster of flowers in front of a background I want to be out of focus, choosing a small aperture will give me too sharp a background and choosing a large aperture is good for the background but the flower cluster will have problems (because it has depth). In that situation I much prefer to use focus stacking by taking a shot with the near part of the flower cluster in focus, then one with the far part in focus, and maybe one with the middle in focus. I then load them into layers in PS, align, and blend for focus stacking, as suggested by rgrenaderphoto.

In this photo the allium heads are in different planes. A single photo got two of them in focus and the other two out. So I took two shots and used focus stacking. The background is both above and below the subject so the gradient method would not produce the desired effect.


(Download)

Reply
Jun 4, 2019 14:34:58   #
rcarol
 
DirtFarmer wrote:
I'm assuming that you are talking about an image where the foreground and background are clearly different areas of the photo. Foreground at the bottom of the frame and background at the top. Not all images are like that so the linear gradient technique would be limited.

I frequently take flower photos. When I have a cluster of flowers in front of a background I want to be out of focus, choosing a small aperture will give me too sharp a background and choosing a large aperture is good for the background but the flower cluster will have problems (because it has depth). In that situation I much prefer to use focus stacking by taking a shot with the near part of the flower cluster in focus, then one with the far part in focus, and maybe one with the middle in focus. I then load them into layers in PS, align, and blend for focus stacking, as suggested by rgrenaderphoto.

In this photo the allium heads are in different planes. A single photo got two of them in focus and the other two out. So I took two shots and used focus stacking. The background is both above and below the subject so the gradient method would not produce the desired effect.
I'm assuming that you are talking about an image w... (show quote)


The standard technique for focus stacking would most likely be a far better solution for the situation you are describing. I never intended to imply that Brandan's technique was a one-step solution for all situations. It is just another tool to assist the photographer in making a better photograph and is to be used when and where it makes sense. Just as there must be a half a dozen ways of sharpening a digital image, not all ways of sharpening work in all situations. It is up to the photographer to use what makes sense and what doesn't.

Reply
Jun 4, 2019 14:54:25   #
DirtFarmer Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
 
rcarol wrote:
The standard technique for focus stacking would most likely be a far better solution for the situation you are describing. I never intended to imply that Brandan's technique was a one-step solution for all situations. It is just another tool to assist the photographer in making a better photograph and is to be used when and where it makes sense. Just as there must be a half a dozen ways of sharpening a digital image, not all ways of sharpening work in all situations. It is up to the photographer to use what makes sense and what doesn't.
The standard technique for focus stacking would mo... (show quote)


I agree that there will be some shots where your method will work and is simple to put in place.

Reply
 
 
Jun 4, 2019 20:11:46   #
Danielmb
 
RCarol ..... 5 minutes is not too long if the end result is what you want. The goal is a good print and not the sound of a clock ticking.

Reply
Jun 4, 2019 21:20:05   #
SAVH Loc: La Jolla, CA
 
rgrenaderphoto, Thank you. I've been trying to figure out how to do that and you have solved the problem. Maybe now I can get it to work. Of course I have to first figure out more about how to work with layers but this is a good start. Thank you again.

Scotty

Reply
Jun 4, 2019 22:38:55   #
rcarol
 
Danielmb wrote:
RCarol ..... 5 minutes is not too long if the end result is what you want. The goal is a good print and not the sound of a clock ticking.


I'm not sure why your comment was directed at me. I have no issue in taking 5 minutes or 5 days to post process an image if it gets you the results you are looking for.

Reply
Jun 4, 2019 23:29:18   #
mrmal Loc: Saskatoon, Sask, Canada
 
So I am using Luminar 3. Will this work in a similar way to PS. I am not very proficient in post prosessing so if someone could submit some direction to do this with Luminar, would be very much appreciated.

Reply
 
 
Jun 5, 2019 01:47:39   #
rcarol
 
mrmal wrote:
So I am using Luminar 3. Will this work in a similar way to PS. I am not very proficient in post prosessing so if someone could submit some direction to do this with Luminar, would be very much appreciated.


I took a look at using Luminar 3 to do focus stacking and it's not obvious to me that there is any way to do this. My conclusion appears to be supported by searching Google.

Reply
Jun 5, 2019 08:40:07   #
mrmal Loc: Saskatoon, Sask, Canada
 
To rcarol - thanks for checking into this and letting me know.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.