Always thought everyone under our Laws were innocent until proven Guilty??
tom kf4wol wrote:
Always thought everyone under our Laws were innocent until proven Guilty??
And that is EXACTLY what happened.
tom kf4wol wrote:
Always thought everyone under our Laws were innocent until proven Guilty??
Libs are not used to having the t***h thrown back into their faces.
Until Trump they lied all they wanted and no one challenged them.
Now they get challenged on their lies and realize they have NO follow up proof to substantiate their lies and it freaks them out.
Mueller isn't fit to clean Flynn's boots.
mjmoore17 wrote:
And this has to do with a current president obstructing justice...how. You and CNN can rewrite history, I do not care. I am interested in making trumps future as short as possible. I have no interest in Obama and Clinton but am amused that attempts to deflect from the
Mushroom boy are so prevalent.
Not deflecting in any way shape or form. Justice should be blind and equal for all.
It should not be partisan or different for one individual than another. For example Jussie Smollett should have been forced to admit guilt in order to have his charges dropped. That didn't happen because of who he knew.
Prosecuting Trump is fine, but only if the same standard is used for Obama, Hillary, Lynch, Holder, et al. If the same level of investigation and the same standard of proof is used on all, then I'm fine with going after Trump or anyone else.
It isn't deflecting to point out that a different standard is being used. And it should be pointed out that your bias is now showing big time. You have just admitted that you don't care about justice, only getting rid of a politician that you don't like.
Those of us on the right detest Obama and everything he stands for, but we never went to the point of trumping up charges against him.
The article that started this post is very relevant to this discussion and is not deflection. It clearly points out that the "crimes" that you accuse Trump of could never have happened if Obama, Holder and Lynch had done their job.
Now Barr is trying to do his job and you rail against him because he is looking at all sides, something that should have always happened.
idaholover wrote:
Angmo, you mean me along with millions of others get all our money back?
Yep. I actively rescue folks from Obamacare with better, much less expensive coverage.
You made me waste my time looking at that video!! I like looking at the links lefties give as evidence because it keeps me on my toes in case I have missed something. But that story was just a big nothingburger. Some Trump official asked somebody "what's happening" in the Flynn investigation, and that's evidence of Obstruction??? You can't find anything better than that? Come on, there's no challenge in this.
btbg wrote:
Not deflecting in any way shape or form. Justice should be blind and equal for all.
It should not be partisan or different for one individual than another. For example Jussie Smollett should have been forced to admit guilt in order to have his charges dropped. That didn't happen because of who he knew.
Prosecuting Trump is fine, but only if the same standard is used for Obama, Hillary, Lynch, Holder, et al. If the same level of investigation and the same standard of proof is used on all, then I'm fine with going after Trump or anyone else.
It isn't deflecting to point out that a different standard is being used. And it should be pointed out that your bias is now showing big time. You have just admitted that you don't care about justice, only getting rid of a politician that you don't like.
Those of us on the right detest Obama and everything he stands for, but we never went to the point of trumping up charges against him.
The article that started this post is very relevant to this discussion and is not deflection. It clearly points out that the "crimes" that you accuse Trump of could never have happened if Obama, Holder and Lynch had done their job.
Now Barr is trying to do his job and you rail against him because he is looking at all sides, something that should have always happened.
Not deflecting in any way shape or form. Justice s... (
show quote)
Nice to hear commonsense once in a while!
phcaan
Loc: Willow Springs, MO
mjmoore17 wrote:
“A probable theory”, then prove it. No charges, no indictments, no arrests but it was all illegal. The real witch-hunt.
You could be referring to Mueller's investigation into Trump "No charges, no indictments, no arrests but it was all illegal. The real witch-hunt."
I agree.
phcaan
Loc: Willow Springs, MO
McKinneyMike wrote:
The Orange Buffoon has brought all of this fire and fury on himself.
10K+ lies and counting.......
Over 140 contacts with Russian officials by members of his campaign......
11 separate acts of obstruction of justice, well documented by Robert Mueller in his report.....
House just getting started looking into his financial liabilities to foreign powers.....
Named as "Individual-1" in SDNY campaign financial case.......
Oh yes he is the most persecuted criminal in the history of the US!!! Don't look now, but the future is not looking much better for the obese cockatoo!
The Orange Buffoon has brought all of this fire an... (
show quote)
To quote your little friend minimoore17 regarding your charges, "“A probable theory”, then prove it. No charges, no indictments, no arrests but it was all illegal. The real witch-hunt."
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.