Mueller finally says it (Page 13): And the lefties are scratching their heads trying to find more BS?

FRENCHY Loc: Stone Mountain , Ga

McKinneyMike wrote:

HAHAHAHA!!!! Your c**p is another Trump distraction, nothing more. Tin Foil conspiracies are better in dime store novels compared this nonsense about a c**p! Trump sleeps with dogs, so he gets fleas!

And the lefties are scratching their heads trying to find more BS?

EyeSawYou

McKinneyMike wrote:

While Barr stated in his April news conference tha... (show quote)

You didn’t even address my statement and decided to create a deflection.

EyeSawYou

gorgehiker wrote:

I have a question that no Trump supporter ever has answered. We now know for a fact that our enemy Russia interfered in our e******n in suppport of Trump and not Hilary. The big question is why did former KGB officer and evil dictator Vladimir Putin so desperately want to help elect Trump as our president?

Ya, and the Russian dossier was intended to destroy Hillary right?

EyeSawYou

Shutterbug1697 wrote:

trump can't be indicted while he's a sitting presi... (show quote)

Official Who Wrote The Special Counsel Rules Says Mueller Can Indict Trump
| Watch | Bookmark
May 18, 2018 10:53:40 #
dirtpusher Joined: Oct 29, 2011 Posts: 96733 Loc: tulsa oklahoma

https://www.politicususa.com/2018/05/17/official-who-wrote-the-special-counsel-rules-says-mueller-can-indict-trump.html

Angmo

EyeSawYou wrote:

Official Who Wrote The Special Counsel Rules Says Mueller Can Indict Trump
| Watch | Bookmark
May 18, 2018 10:53:40 #
dirtpusher Joined: Oct 29, 2011 Posts: 96733 Loc: tulsa oklahoma

https://www.politicususa.com/2018/05/17/official-who-wrote-the-special-counsel-rules-says-mueller-can-indict-trump.html

Yep mueller did not since there’s no crime. Except the ones he refused to look at. Like the source and beginnings of this fiasco.

Hildabeast and DNC. Mueller does not want to testify as he will need to respond to this.

EyeSawYou

Maddow argues the "shaky policy" that presidents cannot be indicted was crafted with dubious origins‘

https://www.salon.com/2019/02/22/maddow-argues-the-shaky-policy-that-presidents-cannot-be-indicted-was-crafted-with-dubious-origins/

EyeSawYou

Angmo wrote:

Yep mueller did not since there’s no crime. Except the ones he refused to look at. Like the source and beginnings of this fiasco.

Hildabeast and DNC. Mueller does not want to testify as he will need to respond to this.

Remember all those times and all those reports from the mainstream media that said that Mueller can indict a sitting president before his report came out. Now they claim that a sitting president cannot be indicted. LOL

Angmo

EyeSawYou wrote:

Maddow argues the "shaky policy" that presidents cannot be indicted was crafted with dubious origins‘

https://www.salon.com/2019/02/22/maddow-argues-the-shaky-policy-that-presidents-cannot-be-indicted-was-crafted-with-dubious-origins/

Maddow is no expert except with lies and deceit. 2 years of lies about collusion without explanation.

Certainly Not an expert on t***h or fact.

boberic Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander

Kmgw9v wrote:

Mueller said: “If we had confidence that Trump did NOT commit a crime, we would have said so”.
Confirmation bias often clouds the t***h.

As I have said previously, a new legal verdict. Not, not guilty. If a prosecutor ,in his closing argument, said to the jury "I have no confidence that the accused, did not commit a crime, the jury would laugh him out of the courtroom.

Angmo

boberic wrote:

As I have said previously, a new legal verdict. Not, not guilty. If a prosecutor ,in his closing argument, said to the jury "I have no confidence that the accused, did not commit a crime, the jury would laugh him out of the courtroom.

I did laugh while the door hit Mueller on the way out.