Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
BREAKING: Trump gives Barr authority to declassify documents
Page <<first <prev 9 of 9
May 27, 2019 07:55:11   #
Shutterbug1697 Loc: Northeast
 
Angmo wrote:
Kkklinton was found to have broken the law 11 times by his special council and was impeached.

Muller said Trump didn't do s**t. ...

Actually it was Barr's interpretation of the Mueller Report that "claimed" that trump didn't do anything wrong.

Mueller stated that there was insufficient evidence found.

This was because the trump campaign destroyed evidence, or conveniently couldn't remember the facts when they were interviewed by Mueller, his team, or the Grand Jury.

There is a big difference between "not doing anything wrong", and "finding insufficient evidence".

So you just keep on pushing your conspiracy theories from Faux News to your heart's content!

Reply
May 27, 2019 08:06:55   #
Shutterbug1697 Loc: Northeast
 
EllieLady wrote:
Both Middle East Wars - - hmmmmm ??? Uhh, wasn't that a father and son...

And yeah, if one takes history into account, it sure seems like there's enough blame to go around when it comes to war...but that isn't what was being discussed, so it's just another radical right-wing diversion.

Wasn't Bolton right in the middle of the last one?

And he's now pushing yet another Middle East conflict?

Who's the war monger here?

Reply
May 27, 2019 08:18:46   #
FRENCHY Loc: Stone Mountain , Ga
 
T***h is not welcome for a few.

Just wait the best is yet to emerge.

Reply
 
 
May 27, 2019 08:23:55   #
Shutterbug1697 Loc: Northeast
 
Steven Seward wrote:
If you are going to compare wars in history, then you will have to concede that the vast majority of times the U.S. has gotten into war, Democrats were in control. That would be War of 1812, The Mexican-American War, The American Civil War (started by Democrats who controlled the South), World War I, World War II, The Korean War, and the Vietnam War. The only exceptions were the short Spanish American War, and both Gulf Wars.

Actually the last time that there was a joint resolution in Congress declaring a "state of war" was on June 5, 1942 for World War II when the United States declared war on Bulgaria, Romania, and Hungary.

Since then the United States has used the term "Authorization to use Military Force".

Reply
May 27, 2019 08:35:27   #
Shutterbug1697 Loc: Northeast
 
LWW wrote:
I thought y’all wanted the t***h to come out ... now y’all fear the t***h. What happened?

The t***h coming out, and the outing of sources within our enemy's ranks risking their lives are two totally different subjects.

I'm all for the t***h coming out, but I'm not for allowing Putin to execute his enemies!

Your Idol, trump, is going after his enemy's list with the declassification of documents and sources!

Reply
May 27, 2019 09:09:15   #
EllieLady Loc: So. CA, USA
 
Shutterbug1697 wrote:
Just how do you come to that conclusion?

Remember that Mueller could NOT charge a sitting president with a crime, per the Justice Department internal memo.

Mueller listed 10 different instances of Obstruction of Justice in Volume II of his report.

And no, you do not have to have to charge someone with a crime for there to be Obstruction of Justice.

Since the redacted Mueller Report was finally released, trump has done nothing but to OBSTRUCT all investigations into the contents and underlying evidence contained in the Mueller Report.

One Federal Judge has already ordered all of the redactions pertaining to Michael Flynn to be unredacted and released, and for the entire Mueller Report to be republished without those redactions.

What is trump so afraid of that he's trying to hide all of the evidence from the Mueller Investigation?

What is trump trying so desperately to hide in his finances, and trying to keep them from being investigated?

Wells Fargo and TD Bank have already turned over their trump related documents.

Two different Federal Judges have already ruled against trump pertaining to the release of documents by Deutsche Bank and Mazars, trump's long time accounting firm.
Just how do you come to that conclusion? br br Re... (show quote)

And what is the up-to-date count of current and former prosecutors who have signed on to the commentary that they would indict based on Mueller's report ???

Last I heard, it was over 900 individuals !!!

How anyone in their right mind could even begin to view that as an exoneration, or "NO" anything, is beyond my comprehension.

Reply
May 27, 2019 10:48:15   #
EyeSawYou
 
Shutterbug1697 wrote:
Actually it was Barr's interpretation of the Mueller Report that "claimed" that trump didn't do anything wrong.

Mueller stated that there was insufficient evidence found.

This was because the trump campaign destroyed evidence, or conveniently couldn't remember the facts when they were interviewed by Mueller, his team, or the Grand Jury.

There is a big difference between "not doing anything wrong", and "finding insufficient evidence".

So you just keep on pushing your conspiracy theories from Faux News to your heart's content!
Actually it was Barr's interpretation of the Muell... (show quote)


LOL exactly what evidence did the Trump campaign destroyed? I think you are mistaken Hillary for Trump in respect to destroying evidence.

Reply
 
 
May 27, 2019 10:49:36   #
EyeSawYou
 
EllieLady wrote:
And what is the up-to-date count of current and former prosecutors who have signed on to the commentary that they would indict based on Mueller's report ???

Last I heard, it was over 900 individuals !!!

How anyone in their right mind could even begin to view that as an exoneration, or "NO" anything, is beyond my comprehension.


It's over, get over it now before you make a fool out of yourself...again.

Reply
May 27, 2019 11:21:06   #
Angmo
 
Shutterbug1697 wrote:
Barr is nothing more than trump's personal lawyer, he DOESN'T represent the people of the United States.


So sweet. The lefties tell you what to say and you comply.

Weak would be a gooder wurd

Reply
May 27, 2019 11:22:27   #
Angmo
 
EllieLady wrote:
And what is the up-to-date count of current and former prosecutors who have signed on to the commentary that they would indict based on Mueller's report ???

Last I heard, it was over 900 individuals !!!

How anyone in their right mind could even begin to view that as an exoneration, or "NO" anything, is beyond my comprehension.


It’s akkktually over

Reply
May 27, 2019 11:23:30   #
Angmo
 
EllieLady wrote:
And what is the up-to-date count of current and former prosecutors who have signed on to the commentary that they would indict based on Mueller's report ???

Last I heard, it was over 900 individuals !!!

How anyone in their right mind could even begin to view that as an exoneration, or "NO" anything, is beyond my comprehension.


It’s actually over. Your indigestion is all the crow you’re eaten.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 9 of 9
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.