Uuglypher wrote:
Hi, Tdozier,
It’s obvious that your wife was simply assuring capture of the highest possible image data possible by properly exposing to capture as much as possible of the camera’s raw-accessible dynamic range. When the image, having been exposed beyond the right (EBTR) was tonally normalized in PP the wisdom of that exposure technique was revealed. She most definitely did NOT “overexpose”. She exposed such that the brightest possible image was captured without clipping highlight detail, but coming as close as possible to clipping highlight detail without actually doing so. She’s holding out on you, Td. Somewhere along the line she determined how much extra raw-accessible DR your camera has, and merely exposed to use it all.
Or...maybe ... it was just good luck! Either way, a perfect EBTR exposure was the result! An image with the highest S:N ratio possible!
For more information on EBTR just search in UUH archives for “EBTR”
Good job!
Dave
Hi, Tdozier, br It’s obvious that your wife was si... (
show quote)
Thanks, I will do that. I was quite pleased with the results and was going to purposely recreate what she did accidently