Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Flower shooting
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
May 8, 2019 18:52:16   #
Islandgal Loc: Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Canada
 
I actually get a lot of use out of my Canon kit lense 17-85mm. But if the flower is big enough such as daylily's a 50mm 1.8 works great.

50mm 1.8
50mm 1.8...

17-85mm 5.6f
17-85mm 5.6f...

17-85mm 5.6f
17-85mm 5.6f...

Reply
May 8, 2019 19:17:15   #
RichardTaylor Loc: Sydney, Australia
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
I'm with the "it depends" replies. The question is far too broad. Even the "as long as it's sharp" is only one pov. See these effects of soft focus and very shallow depth of field:
https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-590576-1.html
https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-589747-1.html

The photo I posted below was at 200 mm on a 70-300 mm lens. No need for a macro lens for close-ups

If you have a large garden (public or private) available, take just the 24-240 and stay a couple of hours. Do different compositions of the same subject at different focal lengths, apertures (for depth of field) and distances. That way you'll learn about your lens as well as perhaps discover what "look" you enjoy the most.

You also need to learn about light and weather conditions. Those will affect your results in many ways. Mid-day sun and shadows are the worst, unless you're going for a harsh look. Wet = saturated colors, soft light enables a more delicate and gentle result.

There is so much more to photography than the accumulation of gear!
I'm with the "it depends" replies. The q... (show quote)


Beautiful.
Almost any lens can be fine. I tend to like long lenses as you can just "reach in" and grab things.

Reply
May 9, 2019 00:36:05   #
Real Nikon Lover Loc: Simi Valley, CA
 
dennis2146 wrote:
I use a Nikon 105 f2.8 Micro lens most of the time but occasionally us a Nikon 24-85 lens. Dennis


Agreed. I also include the Nikon 200mm f/4 AF-D Macro.

I used a 105mm this past weekend to capture some new blossoms using a D850 handheld. Funny thing... After I finished my limited shooting (sunset) I discovered I had inadvertently left the VR off and still got pretty sharp results hand held. Here are a couple samples: Red Gerber Daisy and Yellow Rose.


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
 
 
May 9, 2019 00:41:33   #
Real Nikon Lover Loc: Simi Valley, CA
 
Islandgal wrote:
I actually get a lot of use out of my Canon kit lense 17-85mm. But if the flower is big enough such as daylily's a 50mm 1.8 works great.


Islandgal all your photos are wonderful. I really like #2 with the soft bokeh, and back light.

Reply
May 9, 2019 01:51:32   #
Islandgal Loc: Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Canada
 
Jim Eads wrote:
Islandgal all your photos are wonderful. I really like #2 with the soft bokeh, and back light.


Thanks Jim, I'm learning to appreciate the lenses that I have. Your images with the VR off are amazingly sharp.. I couldn't handhold without stabilization!

Reply
May 9, 2019 08:11:17   #
DavidPine Loc: Fredericksburg, TX
 
With the number of lenses you have and the A7riii, your question is silly.

Reply
May 9, 2019 15:36:35   #
G Brown Loc: Sunny Bognor Regis West Sussex UK
 
DavidPine wrote:
With the number of lenses you have and the A7riii, your question is silly.


No such thing as a silly question!!!!!!

Stupid answers - YES

Reply
 
 
May 11, 2019 07:56:03   #
Teacher22 Loc: Texas
 
Thanks to all for the info and great flower photos.
The point of inquiry was a general question on what lens you prefer to use in different situations, not a cure all. But, some of the responses were interesting!

Reply
May 11, 2019 08:02:39   #
boberic Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
I'm with the "it depends" replies. The question is far too broad. Even the "as long as it's sharp" is only one pov. See these effects of soft focus and very shallow depth of field:
https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-590576-1.html
https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-589747-1.html

The photo I posted below was at 200 mm on a 70-300 mm lens. No need for a macro lens for close-ups

If you have a large garden (public or private) available, take just the 24-240 and stay a couple of hours. Do different compositions of the same subject at different focal lengths, apertures (for depth of field) and distances. That way you'll learn about your lens as well as perhaps discover what "look" you enjoy the most.

You also need to learn about light and weather conditions. Those will affect your results in many ways. Mid-day sun and shadows are the worst, unless you're going for a harsh look. Wet = saturated colors, soft light enables a more delicate and gentle result.

There is so much more to photography than the accumulation of gear!
I'm with the "it depends" replies. The q... (show quote)


Whatever the lens or the settings. that shot of that tulip is spectacular.- Put me in the "that depends" group

Reply
May 11, 2019 09:17:58   #
DirtFarmer Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
 
I generally use the Nikkor 105/2.8 micro for closeup shots.
Sometimes I stack focus.

5 shots focus stacked in PS
5 shots focus stacked in PS...
(Download)

4 shots focus stacked in PS
4 shots focus stacked in PS...
(Download)

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.