Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
mathematical challenge :)
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
May 5, 2019 21:06:38   #
dwermske
 
Sensor size is either FF or some smaller fraction. That fraction is the crop factor. The number of pixels in either sensor is irrelevant to the crop factor. That is because pixels come in different sizes determined by the specific manufacturer. Some FF sensors have 20+ MP while others have 50+ MP. Some smaller (cropped sensors) can have 3+ MP all the way up to 40+ MP. Pixel count does not determine the size of a particular sensor, the pixel size determines the pixel count on any specific size sensor. Trying to determine crop size based on pixel count is nonsense. The physical sensor size in relationship to FF determines the crop factor.

Reply
May 6, 2019 02:26:34   #
SalvageDiver Loc: Huntington Beach CA
 
blackest wrote:
Perfect, I love your work.

Extra Credit:

Human vision is said to be able to just resolve 10 lpm line pairs mm (maybe with my readers on) is there a difference in Print size that can reach this limit using 6000 x 4000 from each sensor? is there a difference in sensitivity to diffraction?


Hi Blackest,

The math is easy for me, it’s getting the composition, lighting, focus, etc., correct that’s the hard part.

I suspect that you’re having a conversation with a friend about cameras over a warm pint. So if you masked off your sensor to 6000x4000 pixels limiting your pixel resolution is the same as your friends, you still have the larger sensor, thus better performance, given similar sensor technology.

To address your ‘Extra Credit’ question, here goes.

Yes, diffraction will affect differently. Diffraction is a function of the lens aperture. For a given aperture, the lens produces an Airy disk of a given size projected onto the sensor plane. Pure physics. In your scenerio, both sensors have the same resolution (i.e. 6000x4000), but the smaller sensor having smaller pixels will be more sensitive to the effects of diffraction. The Airy disk covers more pixels on the smaller sensor than the larger sensor. Pixel pitch is 4.88um for the K1 and 3.92um for the D7200. Steve Perry has a good video on this subject, but make sure you listen to his explanation and apply it to your scenario, otherwise, it’s easy to get confused.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0FXoWdHXTk

To address the print size, the typical human eye with 20/20 vision is capable of resolving about 60 arc-seconds. Based on that, here is a chart, from the DigitalWorkflow Yahoo group, showing viewing distance vs ppi.

Viewing Distance (in) Resolution (ppi)
6 1145
10 687
24 286
36 191
60 115
120 57
600 11
The formula is ppi = 1/((distance x 0.000291) / 2)

(I didn't check the math, but the reference is posted below)

So for your image being viewed at a distance of 2 ft., the print resolution would be 286 ppi. For a 6000x4000 pixel image, that equates to a print size of 21”x14”. Any image printed at a resolution greater than 286 psi, would be unresolved by the typical human eye when viewed at 2 ft. Both prints would look similar.

Here is the article by NorthernLight Images regarding print resolution vs viewing distance at

http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/what-print-resolution-works-for-what-viewing-distance/

Then the question is how would the two cameras affect the print at the same size? It wouldn’t. The sensor resolution is the same for both sensors. But, given your K1@FL=250 vs D7200@FL=200 and using the same f-number and ISO, the FOV will be the same, but the D7200 will have more DOF and noise. So other characteristics of the print will be different between the two cameras. To get the same FOV, DOF and noise from both cameras is an entirely different discussion.
Mike

Reply
May 6, 2019 06:53:54   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
If my photography ever gets this complicated I'll quit and take up basket weaving.

Reply
 
 
May 6, 2019 07:25:12   #
BebuLamar
 
Longshadow wrote:
If my photography ever gets this complicated I'll quit and take up basket weaving.


Don't worry as in the thread tittle it's a math challenge and not a photographic challenge.

Reply
May 6, 2019 07:55:22   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
BebuLamar wrote:
Don't worry as in the thread tittle it's a math challenge and not a photographic challenge.


Reply
May 6, 2019 10:12:20   #
SalvageDiver Loc: Huntington Beach CA
 
BebuLamar wrote:
Don't worry as in the thread tittle it's a math challenge and not a photographic challenge.



Reply
May 6, 2019 20:51:23   #
User ID
 
ggab wrote:

"The crop factor is not 1.23 it is 1.5
just like any full frame vs Nikon dx."


You have not understood the OP.

Reply
 
 
May 6, 2019 20:55:11   #
User ID
 
PHRubin wrote:

Technically - Inadequate information! It is not
the number of sensor pixels that matters, it is
the sensor size in mm². The crop factor is the
square root of the full frame sensor size divided
by the crop sensor size.

Note that all Nikon crop sensors have the same
crop factor, regardless of pixel count, 1.5!


That "explanation" is totally beside the point.
You have not understood the OP query. When
you finally get it, you will wind up with a 1.23
crop factor.

.

Reply
May 6, 2019 20:57:04   #
User ID
 
carl hervol wrote:

how many times is this going to come
up its getting very old!!!!


Your reading comprehension is failing.
This is a new and different question.

Reply
May 7, 2019 00:42:19   #
SalvageDiver Loc: Huntington Beach CA
 
SalvageDiver wrote:
Hi Blackest,

The math is easy for me, it’s getting the composition, lighting, focus, etc., correct that’s the hard part.

I suspect that you’re having a conversation with a friend about cameras over a warm pint. So if you masked off your sensor to 6000x4000 pixels limiting your pixel resolution is the same as your friends, you still have the larger sensor, thus better performance, given similar sensor technology.

To address your ‘Extra Credit’ question, here goes.

Yes, diffraction will affect differently. Diffraction is a function of the lens aperture. For a given aperture, the lens produces an Airy disk of a given size projected onto the sensor plane. Pure physics. In your scenerio, both sensors have the same resolution (i.e. 6000x4000), but the smaller sensor having smaller pixels will be more sensitive to the effects of diffraction. The Airy disk covers more pixels on the smaller sensor than the larger sensor. Pixel pitch is 4.88um for the K1 and 3.92um for the D7200. Steve Perry has a good video on this subject, but make sure you listen to his explanation and apply it to your scenario, otherwise, it’s easy to get confused.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0FXoWdHXTk

To address the print size, the typical human eye with 20/20 vision is capable of resolving about 60 arc-seconds. Based on that, here is a chart, from the DigitalWorkflow Yahoo group, showing viewing distance vs ppi.

Viewing Distance (in) Resolution (ppi)
6 1145
10 687
24 286
36 191
60 115
120 57
600 11
The formula is ppi = 1/((distance x 0.000291) / 2)

(I didn't check the math, but the reference is posted below)

So for your image being viewed at a distance of 2 ft., the print resolution would be 286 ppi. For a 6000x4000 pixel image, that equates to a print size of 21”x14”. Any image printed at a resolution greater than 286 psi, would be unresolved by the typical human eye when viewed at 2 ft. Both prints would look similar.

Here is the article by NorthernLight Images regarding print resolution vs viewing distance at

http://www.northlight-images.co.uk/what-print-resolution-works-for-what-viewing-distance/

Then the question is how would the two cameras affect the print at the same size? It wouldn’t. The sensor resolution is the same for both sensors. But, given your K1@FL=250 vs D7200@FL=200 and using the same f-number and ISO, the FOV will be the same, but the D7200 will have more DOF and noise. So other characteristics of the print will be different between the two cameras. To get the same FOV, DOF and noise from both cameras is an entirely different discussion.
Mike
Hi Blackest, br br The math is easy for me, it’s ... (show quote)



Blackest,

I just checked the math used to generate the table for print size based on viewing distance. Apparently the formula at the bottom is incorrect. There is an extraneous 2x term that shouldn't be there. See my attachment below. The table is correct if you take half the viewing distance for the same dpi. So to answer your first extra credit question, the required dpi is 286 when viewed at 12 inches and 143 when viewed at 24 inches. For printing, that would correspond to a 21"x14" and 42"x28", respectively for a 6000x4000 ppi image.

Here is another reference article, "Finding the Right Print Resolution", which provides more detail.

https://www.digitalphotopro.com/technique/photography-workflow/the-right-resolution/

Mike



Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.