10,000 LIES and still going!
May 1, 2019 10:05:53 #
Elaine2025
Loc: Seattle, Wa
gorgehiker wrote:
Trump isn't just some buffoon. He is the president. Apparently, his cult followers don't possess the intelligence to be able to know the difference between the buffoon's 10,000 lies and the t***h.
Apparently the cult follower dems don't have the intelligence to discern the t***h when a dem buffoon pundit states something. You have proven my point. Dems see no need to search for the t***h, you just believe what you are spoon fed as long as it comes from a dem.
May 1, 2019 10:14:14 #
McKinneyMike wrote:
They are WELL DOCUMENTED, except by FOX News. Funny how they seem to gloss over them.
Could it be that Fox doesn't waste it's time creating false narratives like its MSN colleagues? What a concept and one clearly not recognized by you and your ilk.
May 1, 2019 12:21:10 #
gorgehiker wrote:
The one and only Obama "lie" ever cited by conservatives is "you can keep your doctor". This is their one talking point dished out by Faux News and repeated over and over as if they are nothing but parrots. One lie vs. 10,000 lies. Who is the biggest liar?
.
.
Obama, he lied about all kinds of stuff, Russia is not a threat, ISIS is JV, there is not a smidgen of evidence even though he was communicating under a faux moniker on her private server, make no mistake, Obama lied to the American people continuously it was just that your complicit media overlooked it.
May 1, 2019 12:27:39 #
Bazbo
Loc: Lisboa, Portugal
Wrangler wrote:
What are they? Would someone please give us a run down of what they were?
https://search.yahoo.com/yhs/search?hspart=pty&hsimp=yhs-pty_converter¶m2=17dec342-5e57-4155-a2b8-51e60e7d54db¶m3=converter_~US~appfocus283¶m4=-bb9~Chrome~Washington+post+compliation+of+Trumps+lies~D2D72C35BCEDFABA8A0F5F9BCBD851D9¶m1=20190321&p=Washington+post+compliation+of+Trumps+lies&type=co_appfocus283_cr
May 1, 2019 12:38:43 #
gorgehiker wrote:
The one and only Obama "lie" ever cited by conservatives is "you can keep your doctor". This is their one talking point dished out by Faux News and repeated over and over as if they are nothing but parrots. One lie vs. 10,000 lies. Who is the biggest liar?
.
.
Obummer lied every time he spoke
It was SOP for him and all his sycophants
May 1, 2019 12:43:14 #
Elaine2025
Loc: Seattle, Wa
Bazbo wrote:
https://search.yahoo.com/yhs/search?hspart=pty&hsimp=yhs-pty_converter¶m2=17dec342-5e57-4155-a2b8-51e60e7d54db¶m3=converter_~US~appfocus283¶m4=-bb9~Chrome~Washington+post+compliation+of+Trumps+lies~D2D72C35BCEDFABA8A0F5F9BCBD851D9¶m1=20190321&p=Washington+post+compliation+of+Trumps+lies&type=co_appfocus283_cr
Written by liberal pundits. How nice.
May 1, 2019 12:52:59 #
Bazbo
Loc: Lisboa, Portugal
Elaine2025 wrote:
Written by liberal pundits. How nice.
If you had an ounce of critical thinking at your disposal, you would examine the content on its merits without dismissing it out of hand because you don't like the source.
Here's an idea: just pick one out out the list and lets discuss whether or not it is accurate.
I doubt you want to play, but I am open to it if you can do it without insult or vile personal comments.
May 1, 2019 13:00:50 #
Elaine2025
Loc: Seattle, Wa
Bazbo wrote:
If you had an ounce of critical thinking at your disposal, you would examine the content on its merits without dismissing it out of hand because you don't like the source.
Here's an idea: just pick one out out the list and lets discuss whether or not it is accurate.
I doubt you want to play, but I am open to it if you can do it without insult or vile personal comments.
Here's an idea: just pick one out out the list and lets discuss whether or not it is accurate.
I doubt you want to play, but I am open to it if you can do it without insult or vile personal comments.
Ok, Baz give me a minute.
May 1, 2019 13:04:36 #
Elaine2025
Loc: Seattle, Wa
Bazbo wrote:
If you had an ounce of critical thinking at your disposal, you would examine the content on its merits without dismissing it out of hand because you don't like the source.
Here's an idea: just pick one out out the list and lets discuss whether or not it is accurate.
I doubt you want to play, but I am open to it if you can do it without insult or vile personal comments.
Here's an idea: just pick one out out the list and lets discuss whether or not it is accurate.
I doubt you want to play, but I am open to it if you can do it without insult or vile personal comments.
To be clear, I am not saying Trump doesn't exaggerate and always has his facts down. I think that Trump gets a bad wrap and anything that can be called wrong for the slightest little inflection is called wrong. Ok Baz, lets play. But first read this article.
https://www.t***hdig.com/articles/washington-post-lied-correcting-president-trumps-1950-lies/
May 1, 2019 13:19:14 #
WNC Ralf wrote:
tRUMP is the energizer bunny, 10,000lies and still going!
As a democrat, when did stop towing the party line and start thinking that lying was wrong?
May 1, 2019 18:20:23 #
Bazbo wrote:
If you had an ounce of critical thinking at your disposal, you would examine the content on its merits without dismissing it out of hand because you don't like the source.
Here's an idea: just pick one out out the list and lets discuss whether or not it is accurate.
I doubt you want to play, but I am open to it if you can do it without insult or vile personal comments.
Here's an idea: just pick one out out the list and lets discuss whether or not it is accurate.
I doubt you want to play, but I am open to it if you can do it without insult or vile personal comments.
At the very least Baz you could man up and confess that your lies about Trumps alleged 10,000 lies are lies themselves. Even the media acknowledges that not all are lies. Many are misstatements (aka - NOT a lie). Note that I'm not defending him. Just pointing out your mischaracterization of the facts.
May 1, 2019 21:21:33 #
WNC Ralf wrote:
tRUMP is the energizer bunny, 10,000lies and still going!
Last week it was 5000 and now 10.000? crap MadCow and the media talk this much?
May 2, 2019 00:05:07 #
Bazbo
Loc: Lisboa, Portugal
Elaine2025 wrote:
To be clear, I am not saying Trump doesn't exaggerate and always has his facts down. I think that Trump gets a bad wrap and anything that can be called wrong for the slightest little inflection is called wrong. Ok Baz, lets play. But first read this article.
https://www.t***hdig.com/articles/washington-post-lied-correcting-president-trumps-1950-lies/
https://www.t***hdig.com/articles/washington-post-lied-correcting-president-trumps-1950-lies/
It is hard to understand why you would use this as a defense of Trump/attack on WaPo. The writer of this blog is clearly as disgusted with Trump as am I. He does have his own (largely unsubstantiated) spin on context, which is fair, but he never, as far as I can tell, proves that WaPo is wrong on its assessment of the essential unt***hfulness of Trump. In fact, his added context is often worse for Trump that the WaPo original assessment.
For example, the opening words of the blog:"The writers at the Washington Post are correct that lies spray out of Trump’s face with the force of an untethered fire hose. They’re also correct that almost every statement by Trump is either false or misleading."
That is not a compelling opening argument for your case.
What WaPo gets wrong, in my view, is to present all of the false/misleading statements one one list, implying that they are all of equal importance. Which they are not, of course. Many, if not most, are of so little consequence (size of the inaugural crowd, for example) that they merit no consideration whatsoever other than a laughable attempt by Trump to message his wounded ego--especially when it involves any contrast with Obama.
Yet on the same list are Hitlerian whoppers like doctors delivering live babies, caring or them, wrapping them up and presenting them to the mother so they could decide whether or not to execute the child. A pernicious, vile lie like this has consequences far beyond whether or not Trump's inaugural crowd was the largest in history.
What I had in mind is to pick an item from theWaPo list and discuss whether or not Trump was actually telling the t***h. Your linked blog does not even come close.
May 2, 2019 00:08:19 #
Bazbo
Loc: Lisboa, Portugal
FrumCA wrote:
At the very least Baz you could man up and confess that your lies about Trumps alleged 10,000 lies are lies themselves. Even the media acknowledges that not all are lies. Many are misstatements (aka - NOT a lie). Note that I'm not defending him. Just pointing out your mischaracterization of the facts.
I have not mischaracterized anything. This is a discussion of Wapo's list, not mine.
What I suggest that you try to respond without a sexualized personal insult. That's what a real man would do.
May 2, 2019 00:23:37 #
Bazbo wrote:
If you had an ounce of critical thinking at your disposal, you would examine the content on its merits without dismissing it out of hand because you don't like the source.
Here's an idea: just pick one out out the list and lets discuss whether or not it is accurate.
I doubt you want to play, but I am open to it if you can do it without insult or vile personal comments.
Here's an idea: just pick one out out the list and lets discuss whether or not it is accurate.
I doubt you want to play, but I am open to it if you can do it without insult or vile personal comments.
Were you exercising any ounce of critical thinking when you accused Trump for the past 2+ years with colluding with Russia?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.