Nikon vs Sigma
Apr 29, 2019 20:29:29 #
RWR
Loc: La Mesa, CA
dennis2146 wrote:
PixelStan77 wrote: br Serious Macro photographers ... (show quote)
I apologize for the misunderstanding. I was merely adding to Pixelstan77’s comment: “... don’t use VR because they are using a tripod” or an electronic flash.
Apr 30, 2019 01:58:51 #
RWR wrote:
I apologize for the misunderstanding. I was merely adding to Pixelstan77’s comment: “... don’t use VR because they are using a tripod” or an electronic flash.
Thank you.
Dennis
Apr 30, 2019 02:47:34 #
Pablo8
Loc: Nottingham UK.
I have used the Nikon 105 f/4 Macro since film only days. Got the Sigma 105 f/2.8 a few years ago, and later, got the Sigma 180 f/2.8, because I was so pleased with the results I was getting with the Sigma 105. The Sigma 180 allowed me to have more space between 'shy' subjects and camera, plus, the lens had a tripod mount on the barrel. (very useful). Have been pleased with the quality of images with Sigma lenses.
Check out Video for DSLR and Point and Shoot Cameras section of our forum.
Apr 30, 2019 14:27:26 #
Pablo8 wrote:
I have used the Nikon 105 f/4 Macro since film only days. Got the Sigma 105 f/2.8 a few years ago, and later, got the Sigma 180 f/2.8, because I was so pleased with the results I was getting with the Sigma 105. The Sigma 180 allowed me to have more space between 'shy' subjects and camera, plus, the lens had a tripod mount on the barrel. (very useful). Have been pleased with the quality of images with Sigma lenses.
So am I, Pablo … I have seven of them!!!!
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Commercial and Industrial Photography section of our forum.