Storm was coming as I was driving home.
Original is a cell shot through the windshield.
.
l-fox wrote:
Original is a cell shot through the windshield.
.
As a result of your post Loren, you made it home safely.
Looked at your website. You are very talented lady.
PixelStan77 wrote:
As a result of your post Loren, you made it home safely.
Looked at your website. You are very talented lady.
Thanks, Stan, but Loren was a male name long before the ladies stole it (they end up with almost all male names).
Usually go by Larry. Glad you liked the site.
Curmudgeon wrote:
Spooky to say the least. The converging road disap... (
show quote)
I started to go with fear, but I got sleepy.
l-fox wrote:
Thanks, Stan, but Loren was a male name long before the ladies stole it (they end up with almost all male names).
Usually go by Larry. Glad you liked the site.
Larry, You are very talented and creative.
Good grief! - you were so tired you didn't realise you were driving on the wrong side of the road!
R.G. wrote:
Good grief! - you were so tired you didn't realise you were driving on the wrong side of the road!
Quite the daredevil I am.
Very effective use of post processing to clarify a concept. You might consider dropping the words. As Stanley Kubrick said, "If Leonardo had written on the 'Mona Lisa,' 'This lady is hiding a secret from her lover,' it would have ruined the painting forever." His movies exploited the open-mindedness of experience, as in "2001."
artBob wrote:
Very effective use of post processing to clarify a concept. You might consider dropping the words. As Stanley Kubrick said, "If Leonardo had written on the 'Mona Lisa,' 'This lady is hiding a secret from her lover,' it would have ruined the painting forever." His movies exploited the open-mindedness of experience, as in "2001."
Usually I would agree with your observation and let viewers interpret as they saw it.
This time I felt compelled to offer a shove toward my own thoughts and point of view.
Also, I didn’t actually write on the image. Had I written at the top as is usual at UHH, no one would take notice at all.
Your comment is valid, but remember, the rule is ‘no rules’.
😉
l-fox wrote:
Usually I would agree with your observation and let viewers interpret as they saw it.
This time I felt compelled to offer a shove toward my own thoughts and point of view.
Also, I didn’t actually write on the image. Had I written at the top as is usual at UHH, no one would take notice at all.
Your comment is valid, but remember, the rule is ‘no rules’.
😉
Got it. However, as a rule, "no rules" is a no-no for me. First, I strove, (and advised my student to strive) to master the "rules" (usually visual principles based on human vision, selected via tradition, garnished by technology) and then advance them or know how to effectively break them.
artBob wrote:
Got it. However, as a rule, "no rules" is a no-no for me. First, I strove, (and advised my student to strive) to master the "rules" (usually visual principles based on human vision, selected via tradition, garnished by technology) and then advance them or know how to effectively break them.
Bob —
I really like this line...
(usually visual principles based on human vision, selected via tradition, garnished by technology)
However, slavish, rock-solid adherence to the orthodoxy of any line of endeavor stifles imagination and discovery.
I’m satisfied in my mind that Paleolithic cave artists followed ‘magic rules’ in their work; but someone, somewhere, sometime questioned, abandoned, or modified the rules.
Of course learn/teach the rules, but experiment, too.
— Larry
l-fox wrote:
Original is a cell shot through the windshield.
.
ABSOLUTELY LOVE THIS IMAGE!!!!
ediesaul wrote:
ABSOLUTELY LOVE THIS IMAGE!!!!
So glad you like it. I am quite pleased. Thanks.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.