Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Why hasn't this been done before?
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Apr 18, 2019 09:34:45   #
rydabyk Loc: Florida Panhandle
 
I just ordered a new CPL from Breakthrough Photography (Their filters are not cheap but they're incredible). It's a mix of 3 stop ND and CPL my two most used filters. Why has this not been done before? Am I missing something. I know that I can stack filters but that is another issue altogether. Looking forward to getting this in my hands tomorrow.

Reply
Apr 18, 2019 09:39:32   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
rydabyk wrote:
I just ordered a new CPL from Breakthrough Photography (Their filters are not cheap but they're incredible). It's a mix of 3 stop ND and CPL my two most used filters. Why has this not been done before? Am I missing something. I know that I can stack filters but that is another issue altogether. Looking forward to getting this in my hands tomorrow.


Why don't camera makers make a dedicated L bracket that comes with the camera when you buy it ??

Reply
Apr 18, 2019 09:40:29   #
rydabyk Loc: Florida Panhandle
 
imagemeister wrote:
Why don't camera makers make a dedicated L bracket that comes with the camera when you buy it ??



Reply
 
 
Apr 18, 2019 09:45:23   #
AndyH Loc: Massachusetts and New Hampshire
 
rydabyk wrote:
I just ordered a new CPL from Breakthrough Photography (Their filters are not cheap but they're incredible). It's a mix of 3 stop ND and CPL my two most used filters. Why has this not been done before? Am I missing something. I know that I can stack filters but that is another issue altogether. Looking forward to getting this in my hands tomorrow.


Seriously, I think that it's because the two uses are pretty distinct. There are lots of times I would like to use a polarizer, but am fighting for light. Subtracting another two stops via an ND filter often makes the difference between hand holding or tripod work.

If you shoot mostly tripod work, I can see it, but there are many times when I want a polarizer and no ND. Fewer occasions, I think, when you'd need an ND filter but the polarizer would interfere.


But that's just me.

Andy

Reply
Apr 18, 2019 09:46:13   #
BebuLamar
 
AndyH wrote:
Seriously, I think that it's because the two uses are pretty distinct. There are lots of times I would like to use a polarizer, but am fighting for light. Subtracting another two stops via an ND filter often makes the difference between hand holding or tripod work.

If you shoot mostly tripod work, I can see it, but there are many times when I want a polarizer and no ND. Fewer occasions, I think, when you'd need an ND filter but the polarizer would interfere.


But that's just me.

Andy
Seriously, I think that it's because the two uses ... (show quote)


I agree because I would use a CPL but not the ND filter.

Reply
Apr 18, 2019 09:47:44   #
AndyH Loc: Massachusetts and New Hampshire
 
imagemeister wrote:
Why don't camera makers make a dedicated L bracket that comes with the camera when you buy it ??


Because it would add cost, and it's of relatively low usefulness to a majority of photographers? There are a lot more cameras sold than tripods, last time I checked. That said, every camera maker ought to have an affordable OEM version available. Amazing that some apparently do not.

Andy

Reply
Apr 18, 2019 09:53:02   #
BebuLamar
 
AndyH wrote:
Because it would add cost, and it's of relatively low usefulness to a majority of photographers? There are a lot more cameras sold than tripods, last time I checked. That said, every camera maker ought to have an affordable OEM version available. Amazing that some apparently do not.

Andy


If I remember correctly that in the old days some camera manufacturers did make tripods but they didn't sell well.

Reply
 
 
Apr 18, 2019 09:54:22   #
rydabyk Loc: Florida Panhandle
 
AndyH wrote:
Seriously, I think that it's because the two uses are pretty distinct. There are lots of times I would like to use a polarizer, but am fighting for light. Subtracting another two stops via an ND filter often makes the difference between hand holding or tripod work.

If you shoot mostly tripod work, I can see it, but there are many times when I want a polarizer and no ND. Fewer occasions, I think, when you'd need an ND filter but the polarizer would interfere.


But that's just me.

Andy
Seriously, I think that it's because the two uses ... (show quote)


Thanks for the thoughtful reply and I agree 100% since there are a lot of times I only want a CPL but also so many times walking around in the woods shooting moving water and foliage that I want both. I guess I should have somehow prefaced the question with a reference to mostly tripod work.

Reply
Apr 18, 2019 10:04:04   #
Rich1939 Loc: Pike County Penna.
 
rydabyk wrote:
I just ordered a new CPL from Breakthrough Photography (Their filters are not cheap but they're incredible). It's a mix of 3 stop ND and CPL my two most used filters. Why has this not been done before? Am I missing something. I know that I can stack filters but that is another issue altogether. Looking forward to getting this in my hands tomorrow.


Seems to me that a polarizing filter has always acted as a 2 stop ND. Maybe 'Breakthrough Photography' is trying to sell a fault (even more density) as a feature?

Reply
Apr 18, 2019 10:06:13   #
bleirer
 
Is it a graduated ND? If not don't you already lose 1-2 stops just with a regular CPL?

Reply
Apr 18, 2019 10:17:07   #
AndyH Loc: Massachusetts and New Hampshire
 
rydabyk wrote:
Thanks for the thoughtful reply and I agree 100% since there are a lot of times I only want a CPL but also so many times walking around in the woods shooting moving water and foliage that I want both. I guess I should have somehow prefaced the question with a reference to mostly tripod work.


I can totally see it as useful in a lot of moving water, day for night, and other similar tripod work. The advantage would be that you won't have possible vignetting at wider focal lengths. As with an L-bracket, I just don't think I'd personally find enough use for it. Having a critical mass of potential buyers makes the difference between whether your dream gear item is manufactured in quantity or not, eh?

Still another example of why, even in our hobby, one size most definitely does not fit all!

Andy

Reply
 
 
Apr 18, 2019 10:26:45   #
rydabyk Loc: Florida Panhandle
 
bleirer wrote:
Is it a graduated ND? If not don't you already lose 1-2 stops just with a regular CPL?


No, it's not a GND, it's a circular screw on CPL/ND combo and yes, you do lose roughly 1 stop of light with a CPL but so many times I'm looking for just a bit more to smooth out water etc. I know it's not for everyone and I guess the somewhat limited market kinda answers my question.

Reply
Apr 18, 2019 10:27:20   #
rydabyk Loc: Florida Panhandle
 
AndyH wrote:
I can totally see it as useful in a lot of moving water, day for night, and other similar tripod work. The advantage would be that you won't have possible vignetting at wider focal lengths. As with an L-bracket, I just don't think I'd personally find enough use for it. Having a critical mass of potential buyers makes the difference between whether your dream gear item is manufactured in quantity or not, eh?

Still another example of why, even in our hobby, one size most definitely does not fit all!

Andy
I can totally see it as useful in a lot of moving ... (show quote)



Reply
Apr 18, 2019 15:25:14   #
amfoto1 Loc: San Jose, Calif. USA
 
rydabyk wrote:
I just ordered a new CPL from Breakthrough Photography (Their filters are not cheap but they're incredible). It's a mix of 3 stop ND and CPL my two most used filters. Why has this not been done before? Am I missing something. I know that I can stack filters but that is another issue altogether. Looking forward to getting this in my hands tomorrow.



Actually, it has been done before.

Combination CPL + ND filters have been around for many years. Singh-Ray for sure, but in recent years Nisi and Schneider (who make B+W filters) have been offering them too.

B&H also has some brands I'm not familiar with: Ice and PolarPro.

The Breakthrough CPL + ND are sort of "Johnny-come-lately".

There also are other CPL combination types.... CPL + Warming, CPL + Enhancing, Gold-Blue CPL, Orange-Blue CPL.

A standard CPL has been able to act as approx. a 1.25 to 2.5 stop ND anyway. The modern "high transmissive" type are less... approx. .75 to 1.5 stop.

Reply
Apr 18, 2019 16:50:41   #
Steve Perry Loc: Sylvania, Ohio
 
Yup, as amfoto1 says, there are companies who have done it - I had the one from Singh-Ray in fact. The trick is they are more expensive and if you don't really need one or the other, than it's more cost effective to skip the combo.

The bigger issue is however, that the stacked filters are thicker and often vignette on wider lenses or the wider end of zoom lenses (I couldn't use the one I had on my 24-70 at 24mm~28mm).

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.