Why Conservativews Believe Lies (Page 20): Get educated first. You’re boring with all the lack of knowledge which you show us with such p***e.

Angmo

Frosty wrote:

Response is even weaker with this one.....no surprise. Never has anything to back up his f**e statements or his f**e war hero status.

Get educated first. You’re boring with all the lack of knowledge which you show us with such p***e.

Frosty Loc: Minnesota

LWW wrote:

They were most assuredly not, but you keep being a good agitprop.

Thanks for the vocabulary lesson......had to look it up. I see it pertains to generally c*******t use of propaganda in music and art.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/agitprop
".... political propaganda promulgated chiefly in literature, drama, music, or art"

Your use of the word seems totally inappropriate here. This discussion is about how the National Popular V**e can proceed without amending the constitution. It's not about music, plays, literature or paintings.

Apparently neither one of us knew the meaning of the word.

Frosty Loc: Minnesota

Angmo wrote:

Get educated first. You’re boring with all the lack of knowledge which you show us with such p***e.

You may think it's a lack of knowledge because you don't realize you lack the knowledge to make such a determination. You add nothing to any discussions. The only source you have is from the book you read written by that imported half-wit and convicted felon, D'Souza.

LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America

Frosty wrote:

Thanks for the vocabulary lesson......had to look ... (show quote)

Don’t sell yourself short, your rants are grand theater.

Angmo

Frosty wrote:

You may think it's a lack of knowledge because you don't realize you lack the knowledge to make such a determination. You add nothing to any discussions. The only source you have is from the book you read written by that imported half-wit and convicted felon, D'Souza.

You have no understanding of knowledge.

Why?

Frosty Loc: Minnesota

skylane5sp wrote:

Please show me where I 'insulted' you in this thread. If you see disagreement is 'insult', I feel sorry for you.

You said: "
The 'national popular v**e bill' will NOT take effect in the manner you present. You don't just make up a bill to amend the Constitution. Some imagined 'tipping point' of e*******l v**es will have absolutely NO effect on the Constitution.

Like people have been telling you. Read a book. Or start with the Constitution. Article V. There are many conservative institutions that will provide you with a free copy of your very own. Read it. Learn something."

I don't know if you have gone back and read the constitution or not or even my earlier posts where I explained, and big bear also, how this was not a matter that needed a constitutional amendment.....but, it doesn't!!

I guess I considered your last paragraph an insult, since I know what I am talking about and have been trying to educate some right wingers that just don't read or dont get it. Then you tell me to learn something. I probably have a lot to learn but not in this case. The V Amendment does not apply because the manner States chose e*******l college delegates is not specified in the constitution. I've explained this several times here.

Btw, maybe you can explain why so many conservatives are opposed to electing our president in the same manner we elect school board members, mayors, state representatives, governors, U.S. Representatives and Senators. We do all of these by majority v**e. What is wrong with that?

Please don't say something about what Madison once said about the tyranny of the majority without at least saying what the tyranny at issue is and why the issue, if it exists, wasn't resolved by our founders when they devised the Senate which gave equal powder to all states and wrote the Bill of Rights.

Frosty Loc: Minnesota

Angmo wrote:

You have no understanding of knowledge.

Why?

You say nothing. Back up what you say for once. You have no understanding, period.

You don't even realize people are laughing at you and at me for responding to your empty, nonsensical posts.

Frosty Loc: Minnesota

LWW wrote:

Don’t sell yourself short, your rants are grand theater.

Your rants aren't except perhaps on a playground where they engage in that kind of thing.

Angmo

Frosty wrote:

You say nothing. Back up what you say for once. You have no understanding, period.

You don't even realize people are laughing at you and at me for responding to your empty, nonsensical posts.

Aren’t your comments a mere void? You
Must be Taoist at heart. Perhaps a failed one?

You must find relevance with this definition:

IGNORAMUS, n. A person unacquainted with certain kinds of knowledge familiar to yourself, and having certain other kinds that you know nothing about.

Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa

Frosty wrote:

You say nothing. Back up what you say for once. You have no understanding, period.

You don't even realize people are laughing at you and at me for responding to your empty, nonsensical posts.

No, Frosty, people are just laughing and you.

slocumeddie Loc: Inside your head, again

Hey Frosty..........Dunning and Kruger could write a book about you..........

LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America

Angmo wrote:

You have no understanding of knowledge.

Why?

Nor knowledge of understanding!

LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America

Frosty wrote:

Your rants aren't except perhaps on a playground where they engage in that kind of thing.

You got beat up a lot at the playground is my bet.

Frosty Loc: Minnesota

Angmo wrote:

Aren’t your comments a mere void? You
Must be Taoist at heart. Perhaps a failed one?

You must find relevance with this definition:

IGNORAMUS, n. A person unacquainted with certain kinds of knowledge familiar to yourself, and having certain other kinds that you know nothing about.

On topic. Here is a question for you. Let's see how knowledgeable you are.

If the majority of people v**ed for candidate A and the state awarded all the e*******l v**es to Candidate B. Would you be in favor of a system like that?

Frosty Loc: Minnesota

LWW wrote:

Nor knowledge of understanding!

Same question for you.
On topic. Let's see knowledgeable you are.

If the majority of people v**ed for candidate A and the state awarded all the e*******l v**es to Candidate B. Would you be in favor of a system like that?