Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Post-Processing Digital Images
Do you wish your mountains were larger? Try this technique!
Page <prev 2 of 2
Apr 17, 2019 07:38:36   #
AZNikon Loc: Mesa, AZ
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
I didn't make you have to work for that one at all, did I Paul?



Reply
Apr 17, 2019 10:10:35   #
Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan
 
I like the miracle grow comment.

Reply
Apr 17, 2019 13:39:55   #
artBob Loc: Near Chicago
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
Many thanks to Fstop12 for providing this link:
https://mattk.com/photoshop-landscape-photo-size-trick/

I found it surprisingly easy to do, mostly because you don't have to follow the outline of the element exactly, and for the tip to feather the selection by 25 pixels. Touch-up can be done by erasing from the new layer and/or cloning where required. And since you're staying within the same scene, there's no worry about matching the direction or color of light.

Try it and post your results here.
Many thanks to Fstop12 for providing this link: br... (show quote)

Fine tool! Chicago, across frozen Lake Michigan. Not wanting it to stand out too much because catching the distance (40 mi.) was important, I had to work the eraser, curves, and hues a bit.


(Download)

Reply
 
 
Apr 17, 2019 14:02:23   #
tommystrat Loc: Bigfork, Montana
 
OK, this is by far the coolest, most fun technique I have come across in a long time! Thanks for posting, and I only wish I had seen this about 4 months ago, so those long, cold winter days could have been spent in my office playing with this new toy! I am posting these efforts as a "down and dirty" example of what can be done. I know they need some touch-ups and such, but to illustrate the technique's potential I think they do nicely...Enjoy!





Reply
Apr 17, 2019 14:21:38   #
L-Fox
 
tommystrat wrote:
OK, this is by far the coolest, most fun technique I have come across in a long time! Thanks for posting, and I only wish I had seen this about 4 months ago, so those long, cold winter days could have been spent in my office playing with this new toy! I am posting these efforts as a "down and dirty" example of what can be done. I know they need some touch-ups and such, but to illustrate the technique's potential I think they do nicely...Enjoy!


Haven't tried yet myself. I see that you did very well.

However....... You said 'fun'........ This is serious stuff we're doing here!

Reply
Apr 17, 2019 14:25:31   #
Fstop12 Loc: Kentucky
 
tommystrat wrote:
OK, this is by far the coolest, most fun technique I have come across in a long time! Thanks for posting, and I only wish I had seen this about 4 months ago, so those long, cold winter days could have been spent in my office playing with this new toy! I am posting these efforts as a "down and dirty" example of what can be done. I know they need some touch-ups and such, but to illustrate the technique's potential I think they do nicely...Enjoy!


Looks like it's working for you!

Reply
Apr 17, 2019 14:50:11   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
artBob wrote:
Fine tool! Chicago, across frozen Lake Michigan. Not wanting it to stand out too much because catching the distance (40 mi.) was important, I had to work the eraser, curves, and hues a bit.
So, it's the skyline you enlarged, or something else? The idea is to go big, Bob

Reply
 
 
Apr 17, 2019 14:51:24   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
tommystrat wrote:
OK, this is by far the coolest, most fun technique I have come across in a long time! Thanks for posting, and I only wish I had seen this about 4 months ago, so those long, cold winter days could have been spent in my office playing with this new toy! I am posting these efforts as a "down and dirty" example of what can be done. I know they need some touch-ups and such, but to illustrate the technique's potential I think they do nicely...Enjoy!
Good job!

Reply
Apr 17, 2019 16:22:09   #
artBob Loc: Near Chicago
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
So, it's the skyline you enlarged, or something else? The idea is to go big, Bob

Big's gotta be real--that's the craftsmanship and artistry for me.

So, I wanted the distance to be a big factor, but the skyline was too small because of the lens. Here are the original, the one I like, and, perhaps, what you suggested.

As usual, Anyone who wants to alter any of my photos to show explicitly what they mean is welcome to do so.


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
Apr 17, 2019 16:54:13   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
artBob wrote:
......the skyline was too small because of the lens.
Ah, I see the problem now - size definitely is relative

Reply
Apr 17, 2019 16:59:32   #
artBob Loc: Near Chicago
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
Ah, I see the problem now - size definitely is relative


👍😊

Reply
 
 
Apr 18, 2019 14:56:55   #
tommystrat Loc: Bigfork, Montana
 
l-fox wrote:
Haven't tried yet myself. I see that you did very well.

However....... You said 'fun'........ This is serious stuff we're doing here!



Reply
Apr 23, 2019 16:15:49   #
minniev Loc: MIssissippi
 
That IS a fun trick! I've occasionally done similar just bumbling around trying to enlarge some piece of a photo by using strategies I've used to change sizes of elements in composites, but this is the first time I've seen a dedicated tutorial about HOW. I see some serious potential here to solve the problem of diminished size of distant objects shot with wide angle lenses. Plus a bunch of other stuff as well. I tried it on 3 scenes, and it worked best when I wasn't trying to tangle with interferences like trees that start looking funny in relation to their neighbors, or buildings, which get distorted more quickly with vertical tampering. I think I'll figure out strategies for better selection of what to enlarge if I work with it a while. And mending is, of course, the same tedious task it always is for things we mangle in the processes of beating up on our images for creativity's sake.

Here's one I tried on a scene from Iceland, where I tried to make the mid-scene wave and the distant rocks bigger while leaving everything else alone. My trouble area was where the altered rocks and sea met the unaltered rocks on the left side. I used a fog brush to try to disguise the trouble.


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
Apr 23, 2019 16:53:09   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
minniev wrote:
That IS a fun trick! I've occasionally done similar just bumbling around trying to enlarge some piece of a photo by using strategies I've used to change sizes of elements in composites, but this is the first time I've seen a dedicated tutorial about HOW. I see some serious potential here to solve the problem of diminished size of distant objects shot with wide angle lenses. Plus a bunch of other stuff as well. I tried it on 3 scenes, and it worked best when I wasn't trying to tangle with interferences like trees that start looking funny in relation to their neighbors, or buildings, which get distorted more quickly with vertical tampering. I think I'll figure out strategies for better selection of what to enlarge if I work with it a while. And mending is, of course, the same tedious task it always is for things we mangle in the processes of beating up on our images for creativity's sake.

Here's one I tried on a scene from Iceland, where I tried to make the mid-scene wave and the distant rocks bigger while leaving everything else alone. My trouble area was where the altered rocks and sea met the unaltered rocks on the left side. I used a fog brush to try to disguise the trouble.
That IS a fun trick! I've occasionally done simila... (show quote)
Thank you, Minnie! You've raised the bar for us all

Reply
Apr 23, 2019 17:31:35   #
artBob Loc: Near Chicago
 
minniev wrote:
That IS a fun trick! I've occasionally done similar just bumbling around trying to enlarge some piece of a photo by using strategies I've used to change sizes of elements in composites, but this is the first time I've seen a dedicated tutorial about HOW. I see some serious potential here to solve the problem of diminished size of distant objects shot with wide angle lenses. Plus a bunch of other stuff as well. I tried it on 3 scenes, and it worked best when I wasn't trying to tangle with interferences like trees that start looking funny in relation to their neighbors, or buildings, which get distorted more quickly with vertical tampering. I think I'll figure out strategies for better selection of what to enlarge if I work with it a while. And mending is, of course, the same tedious task it always is for things we mangle in the processes of beating up on our images for creativity's sake.

Here's one I tried on a scene from Iceland, where I tried to make the mid-scene wave and the distant rocks bigger while leaving everything else alone. My trouble area was where the altered rocks and sea met the unaltered rocks on the left side. I used a fog brush to try to disguise the trouble.
That IS a fun trick! I've occasionally done simila... (show quote)


Good points, good image incorporating a festive solution for that photo. I totally agree, that each photo has special needs, calling on our creativity and command of techniques.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Post-Processing Digital Images
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.