Muellar Report Exonerates Trump... good so I'd like to read it to understand.
Apr 8, 2019 10:13:28 #
Apr 8, 2019 10:24:24 #
DaveO wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FtNm9CgA6U
For those who don’t understand the Barr summary.
Apr 8, 2019 10:54:43 #
Frank T wrote:
Redacting for the public release and redacting for a Congressional Investigation are two very different and separate things.
There is no reason that Congress cannot get the full report, other than Barr is covering for the puppet master.
There is no reason that Congress cannot get the full report, other than Barr is covering for the puppet master.
Tough Schitt Frank, live with it, just like we had to under Dumbo.
Apr 8, 2019 10:59:05 #
Blurryeyed wrote:
Tough Schitt Frank, live with it, just like we had to under Dumbo.
Wow. What a brilliant answer.
Guess what? We're going to prevail a whole.
Apr 8, 2019 11:21:19 #
Frank T wrote:
Wow. What a brilliant answer.
Guess what? We're going to prevail a whole.
Guess what? We're going to prevail a whole.
A whole what Frank?
What makes you say that Frank, it will take a court order, and if the White House chooses to fight it, which they will when the Schittheads in congress go for all the underlying documents it will find its way to the SCOTUS where both Cavanaugh and Gorsuch are still stinging from the way the Schittheads in the Senate treated them through the confirmation process.
Apr 8, 2019 11:56:19 #
Shutterbug1697 wrote:
Allegedly conferring with Mueller!
There is no proof that Mueller has had ANY input into what Barr actually plans to release to Congress. It's nothing more than a smokescreen to keep the right wing in line with their PROPAGANDA campaign!
Faux News is proof of that propaganda campaign.
There is no proof that Mueller has had ANY input into what Barr actually plans to release to Congress. It's nothing more than a smokescreen to keep the right wing in line with their PROPAGANDA campaign!
Faux News is proof of that propaganda campaign.
"Barr is working with Rosenstein, Mueller, and their key aides to produce an edited version of the report. "
https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/nation/2019/04/07/suspicion-high-barr-redacts-mueller-report/Lpj2U58wFdXiKFcNuAZVrM/story.html
https://www.apnews.com/7c74fca281a8481e9383454cc296a89e
https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/04/politics/justice-department-mueller-report-findings-william-barr/index.html
Apr 8, 2019 11:56:22 #
ArtzDarkroom wrote:
Maybe after reading it, I can understand the error of my Liberal leaning ways.
That will never happen. Liberals have no ability to change their ways. They are evil through and through.
Apr 8, 2019 12:36:02 #
lol... and don't you forget it.
bob44044 wrote:
That will never happen. Liberals have no ability to change their ways. They are evil through and through.
Apr 8, 2019 15:45:02 #
ArtzDarkroom wrote:
Maybe after reading it, I can understand the error of my Liberal leaning ways.
In years past, a person was innocent until proven guilty. Our president has not been proven guilty. He has not even been indicted.
Has that rule of law been changed? To the best of my knowledge that rule of law still stands and that makes our president innocent.
Apr 8, 2019 15:49:52 #
Wrangler wrote:
In years past, a person was innocent until proven guilty. Our president has not been proven guilty. He has not even been indicted.
Has that rule of law been changed? To the best of my knowledge that rule of law still stands and that makes our president innocent.
Has that rule of law been changed? To the best of my knowledge that rule of law still stands and that makes our president innocent.
Really? Not counting HRC and a few others according to some on here.
Apr 8, 2019 16:27:38 #
DaveO wrote:
Really? Not counting HRC and a few others according to some on here.
We seem to have a lot of arm chair judges on the UHH.
Do we really want to compare what HRC admitted to what the President admitted? That would be off topic.
Apr 8, 2019 16:32:39 #
Wrangler wrote:
We seem to have a lot of arm chair judges on the UHH.
Do we really want to compare what HRC admitted to what the President admitted? That would be off topic.
Do we really want to compare what HRC admitted to what the President admitted? That would be off topic.
"In years past, a person was innocent until proven guilty." Your quote. Doesn't speak to anything other that innocent until proven guilty. My reply inferred was that it is not always the standard used. On topic I hope.
Apr 8, 2019 17:49:40 #
DaveO wrote:
"In years past, a person was innocent until proven guilty." Your quote. Doesn't speak to anything other that innocent until proven guilty. My reply inferred was that it is not always the standard used. On topic I hope.
I agree. People often confuse the legal and political situations. People often break the law especially when it fits their purpose and/or political beliefs.
Apr 8, 2019 18:24:31 #
Wrangler wrote:
I agree. People often confuse the legal and political situations. People often break the law especially when it fits their purpose and/or political beliefs.
Yes, that's quite easy to do. The other factor is just the plain old general goofing that some of us goofers get involved in!
Apr 8, 2019 20:38:29 #
After all this nonsense is over lefties will just cling to the next dingleberry. Funny stinky bunch, lefties.
Never ending fantasy land. Lies rumors and lies. Poor folks have been played by their own handlers. Lol.
That’s how it’s been. Comey Comey Comey. Then mueller mueller mueller now that’s done redactions. After that.... fantasy global laughingstock. The world laughs at all the useful i***ts. They see more t***h and fact than any leftie.
Never ending fantasy land. Lies rumors and lies. Poor folks have been played by their own handlers. Lol.
That’s how it’s been. Comey Comey Comey. Then mueller mueller mueller now that’s done redactions. After that.... fantasy global laughingstock. The world laughs at all the useful i***ts. They see more t***h and fact than any leftie.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.