Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
OPINION: Don’t Get Fooled Again — The SDNY Has As Much On Trump As Mueller Did
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
Apr 7, 2019 10:58:52   #
Angmo
 
Shutterbug1697 wrote:
You are mixing up Criminal Activity, and insufficient evidence to prosecute "beyond a reasonable doubt"!

There is a big difference between the two!


It was a h**x paid for by Hildabeast. Exposing the entire report will implicate too many lefties for jail time.

You’ve been played. Again.

Reply
Apr 7, 2019 12:27:15   #
letmedance Loc: Walnut, Ca.
 
I do believe that the report concluded that no American investigated conspired with the Russians, eat your crow and get on with life.

Reply
Apr 7, 2019 14:03:50   #
Angmo
 
letmedance wrote:
I do believe that the report concluded that no American investigated conspired with the Russians, eat your crow and get on with life.


Some easy to read wurds for the impaired left.



Reply
 
 
May 16, 2019 09:04:52   #
Shutterbug1697 Loc: Northeast
 
Shutterbug1697 wrote:
Only in trump's and his uneducated base's eyes!

Except that it wasn't!

Mueller specifically wrote that his report did NOT clear trump on Obstruction of Justice.

It was Barr who chose to make that call on a Criminal charge, instead of letting Congress review the facts and evidence and make their own decision on the evidence about Impeachment.

Barr is now Obstructing Justice by hiding the evidence from Congress.

Yes the entire report needs to go to Congress, they have the Security Clearance to review the report. But Barr is hiding the findings from Congress because that's what he said he would do in his 19 page letter sent to trump as a way of an interview for his current job.

An AG is supposed to be working for the People of the United States, not for the sole purpose of hiding the crimes of his boss.

Although many of trump's base actually believe that the recent ruling by the Federal Courts in the Starr case precludes the release of the Mueller Grand Jury evidence, the cases are different in scope. The Starr case was requesting Grand Jury information to be released to the public. With the Mueller Report, Congress needs the information for deciding if there is enough evidence to move forward with Impeachment procedings.

All that's needed is a request by either Congress, or Barr to the courts for Congress to receive the entire Mueller Report, all of the evidence, and the Grand Jury information. Case in point - Nixon v. United States. In that case it was the Grand Jury that requested the release of the Grand Jury procedings to Congress.

Barr can redacted to his hearts content for the PUBLIC release of the Mueller Report, but Congress MUST be provided with the complete and unredacted Mueller Report.

We'll be seeing this tug of war play out in court, where trump and Barr will end up losing!

All that Barr will accomplish is a delaying tactic to shield trump's activities from his v****g base. But that uneducated base just isn't large enough to get him reelected!
Only in trump's and his uneducated base's eyes! br... (show quote)

AT&T promised 7,000 new jobs to get tax break—it cut 23,000 jobs instead.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2019/05/att-promised-7000-new-jobs-to-get-tax-break-it-cut-23000-jobs-instead/

Reply
May 16, 2019 09:28:55   #
LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America
 
Frank T wrote:
Rac,
Personally, I'm waiting for the indictments on Jared and Ivanka. We'll deal with Trump on E******n Day.


How’s that coming along?

Reply
May 16, 2019 09:41:25   #
Frank T Loc: New York, NY
 
LWW wrote:
How’s that coming along?


I don't know and neither do you.
I do know that these new tariffs that were placed on goods from China somehow exempted clothing so Ivanka and Donald can still have their clothes made there and shipped in tariff-free.
I guess you Trumpers don't see anything wrong with that. I mean, after all, he's your hero and you already knew he was dishonest.
Quite a moral high-ground you've got there.

Reply
May 16, 2019 10:23:08   #
EyeSawYou
 
rehess wrote:
How does "does not exonerate" t***slate into "did exonerate"???


Learn to read, I said Barr exonerated Trump.

Reply
 
 
May 16, 2019 10:26:35   #
Angmo
 
EyeSawYou wrote:
Learn to read, I said Barr exonerated Trump.


So did mueller.

That’s all folks.



Reply
May 16, 2019 11:37:38   #
rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
 
Angmo wrote:
So did mueller.

That’s all folks.

Nope.

In the introduction to Volume II, the last sentence under his fourth point {second paragraph from the bottom on page 2}, Mueller writes "Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him."

Reply
May 16, 2019 12:10:02   #
Angmo
 
rehess wrote:
Nope.

In the introduction to Volume II, the last sentence under his fourth point {second paragraph from the bottom on page 2}, Mueller writes "Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him."


He had to fill in 400 pages of nothing. If you read up on the law that statement is meaningless.

Equally stupid was the public statement made about Hildabeast. Exoneration ain’t his job. Look it up.

Lefties are ill-educated.

A bunch of desperate kkklingers.

Reply
May 16, 2019 12:15:54   #
rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
 
Angmo wrote:
He had to fill in 400 pages of nothing. If you read up on the law that statement is meaningless.

Equally stupid was the public statement made about Hildabeast. Exoneration ain’t his job. Look it up.

Lefties are ill-educated.

A bunch of desperate kkklingers.

Your fourth sentence is correct, which is why saying he exonerated Trump is dumb.

Your first sentence is totally incorrect. The information he presents severely damages Trump for anyone who reads the report with an open mind.

Reply
 
 
May 16, 2019 12:25:20   #
Angmo
 
rehess wrote:
Your fourth sentence is correct, which is why saying he exonerated Trump is dumb.

Your first sentence is totally incorrect. The information he presents severely damages Trump for anyone who reads the report with an open mind.


As intended. He had nothing. Zilch nada. No kkkrime. So gotta do a book report. Monstrously incompetent abuse of law.

Read the law, regulations and Muellers actual responsibilities.

They are all being investigated. A failed c**p.

Reply
May 16, 2019 13:28:13   #
rehess Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
 
Angmo wrote:
As intended. He had nothing. Zilch nada. No kkkrime. So gotta do a book report. Monstrously incompetent abuse of law.

Read the law, regulations and Muellers actual responsibilities.

They are all being investigated. A failed c**p.

He had lots. Anyone not protected from federal prosecution by being President would have been indicted. The evident of "Obstruction of Justice" is stronger that it was against W. Clinton - at least as strong as it was against Nixon - but the Democrats are too smart to pursue Impeachment since he is being protected by McConnell. If you can't see that, so be it - I have nothing more to say- my point that Mueller did not exonerate Trump stands ... your statement that Mueller did exonerate Trump fails.

Reply
May 16, 2019 14:07:36   #
Angmo
 
rehess wrote:
He had lots. Anyone not protected from federal prosecution by being President would have been indicted. The evident of "Obstruction of Justice" is stronger that it was against W. Clinton - at least as strong as it was against Nixon - but the Democrats are too smart to pursue Impeachment since he is being protected by McConnell. If you can't see that, so be it - I have nothing more to say- my point that Mueller did not exonerate Trump stands ... your statement that Mueller did exonerate Trump fails.
He had lots. Anyone not protected from federal pro... (show quote)


Check up on the law. Actually read it. Look at the branches of government. The separation of powers.

Have you ever passed civics? Show me the line anywhere defining roles and responsibilities and who it is who exonerates.

In the real world. Not pretendzies.

Astonishing..... the education of kids these days.

*hint propaganda and indoctrination are leftie ways to get around real law and the rule of law.

Reply
May 17, 2019 05:38:53   #
Shutterbug1697 Loc: Northeast
 
McKinneyMike wrote:
What will Rac do if the Congress gets the full report? Oh the humanity of it all.

The judge in the Michael Flynn case just ordered ALL reactions pertaining to Flynn to be removed from the Mueller Report, and the newly unredacted report to be republished to the public by May 31st.

In the redacted sections, there is essentially a "threatening" voice message left by trump's lawyers to Flynn on the "eve" of Flynn flipping and cooperating with the investigation.

The "threat" is an attempt to Obstruct Justice, supported by actual evidence.

No matter how hard they try, trump's minions can't hide from the t***h, because it's going to come out one way or another.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.