MSNBC's Ocasio-Cortez Town Hall falls flat, loses to Tucker Carlson in ratings (Page 2): It is truly amazing what the dems put out there for the country to see.

Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa

Cykdelic wrote:

The real question is when do the Democrats and their leadership give her so much coverage. Heck, they sponsored this nobody child’s 100 trillion dollar boondoggle.

It is truly amazing what the dems put out there for the country to see.

soba1 Loc: Somewhere In So Ca

davidrb wrote:

P T Barnum was correct about one of these being born every minute.

Something is just not right about that woman

FRENCHY Loc: Stone Mountain , Ga

MikeMck wrote:

Of course, fox news always tells the t***h

Maybe, but the real news and info come from Rush Limbaugh.

FRENCHY Loc: Stone Mountain , Ga

idaholover wrote:

You forgot her greatest achievement...she makes an awesome Mojito!

And I am wondering if she can think and have m*******tion at the same time.

McKinneyMike Loc: Texas

idaholover wrote:

https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/msnbcs-ocasio-cortez-town-hall-falls-flat-loses-to-tucker

The bigger question is how long will FOX stick with Carlson given the landslide of blue chip advertisers that have abandoned his time slot over his r****t comments?

Curtis_Lowe Loc: Georgia

McKinneyMike wrote:

The bigger question is how long will FOX stick with Carlson given the landslide of blue chip advertisers that have abandoned his time slot over his r****t comments?

Count me in the group that thinks that very large numbers of people coming across the southern boarder is a real problem that I want stopped. I happen to think a WALL would assist with significantly reducing that problem.

I think that liberals calling everything someone says that they do not like either R****t or H**E speech, really cheapens both things.

I watch Tucker and do not think he is R****t, it is the Liberal way of silencing anyone that dares to speak of a different viewpoint.

McKinneyMike Loc: Texas

Curtis_Lowe wrote:

Count me in the group that thinks that very large ... (show quote)

Evidently these blue chip advertisers see it different than you do!

Curtis_Lowe Loc: Georgia

McKinneyMike wrote:

Evidently these blue chip advertisers see it different than you do!

The respond to the heard that follows the twitter piper. not what Tucker does of does not say.

People who run the advertising business are terrified of the twitter campaign that is threated against them if they do not do this or that. Talk about F*****t behaviour.

McKinneyMike Loc: Texas

Curtis_Lowe wrote:

The respond to the heard that follows the twitter piper. not what Tucker does of does not say.

People who run the advertising business are terrified of the twitter campaign that is threated against them if they do not do this or that. Talk about F*****t behaviour.

As I said, if these heads of industry felt that it was a minority view, doubtful they would lose a second of sleep, but obviously they see it for what it is, or should I say how the buyers of their products see it.
Twitter is as powerful as a popcorn fart to most Americans.

Curtis_Lowe Loc: Georgia

McKinneyMike wrote:

As I said, if these heads of industry felt that it was a minority view, doubtful they would lose a second of sleep, but obviously they see it for what it is, or should I say how the buyers of their products see it.
Twitter is as powerful as a popcorn fart to most Americans.

Social Media is not a popcorn fart as you say, we will just disagree on that.

The left does not want competing dialogue they will try to silence anyone they disagree with, look what has happened at most universities.

pay attention or not, you must agree with the boycott folks silence those that you disagree with.

McKinneyMike Loc: Texas

Curtis_Lowe wrote:

Social Media is not a popcorn fart as you say, we will just disagree on that.

The left does not want competing dialogue they will try to silence anyone they disagree with, look what has happened at most universities.

pay attention or not, you must agree with the boycott folks silence those that you disagree with.

This is a free country. People do as they chose and their spending choices are of great interest to larger companies. I said Twitter is as powerful as a popcorn fart, not social media as a whole. FaceBook is far more influential than Twitter.

EyeSawYou

McKinneyMike wrote:

This is a free country. People do as they chose and their spending choices are of great interest to larger companies. I said Twitter is as powerful as a popcorn fart, not social media as a whole. FaceBook is far more influential than Twitter.

Facebook is far more influential that Twitter? I beg to differ..

https://socialmediarevolver.com/12-reasons-twitter-better-facebook/

Curtis_Lowe Loc: Georgia

McKinneyMike wrote:

This is a free country. People do as they chose and their spending choices are of great interest to larger companies. I said Twitter is as powerful as a popcorn fart, not social media as a whole. FaceBook is far more influential than Twitter.

I did not think FaceBook was more influential but it may be to your demographic. Social Media (I mostly abstain except for pictures of my grandkids). My understanding is different than yours, I believe Twitter to be more influential at Stampedes or hustles as it reacts very quickly and is organized around yelling and not consumption or viewing. IMHO.

Again we should agree to disagree, it is after all just an opinion, I value mine you value yours!

EyeSawYou

Curtis_Lowe wrote:

Count me in the group that thinks that very large ... (show quote)

Don't mind Mike, he believes that most people on the right are r****t like him.

EyeSawYou

McKinneyMike wrote:

The bigger question is how long will FOX stick with Carlson given the landslide of blue chip advertisers that have abandoned his time slot over his r****t comments?

Exactly what r****ts comments came from Tucker? Why must you lie about others?