Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
Gasp! All I had was an Iphone6
Page 1 of 2 next>
Apr 1, 2019 07:12:50   #
daldds Loc: NYC
 
Waiting on line yesterday matinee. I noticed his forked goatee when he was full face, but by the time I got the phone out and set to max telephoto, all I got was this profile. But, as some hog once said, any camera is better than none. The only edit was to darken the sign a little.



Reply
Apr 1, 2019 07:23:50   #
berchman Loc: South Central PA
 
daldds wrote:
Waiting on line yesterday matinee. I noticed his forked goatee when he was full face, but by the time I got the phone out and set to max telephoto, all I got was this profile. But, as some hog once said, any camera is better than none. The only edit was to darken the sign a little.


Nice try, but an iPhone X would have done a better job of capturing the detail in the hair and skin.

Reply
Apr 1, 2019 07:30:20   #
daldds Loc: NYC
 
Really? My 6 texts, gets emails, and lets me talk to people...right?

Reply
 
 
Apr 1, 2019 07:31:27   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
Nice try is about all this amounts to. Lots of blown highlights.
--Bob
daldds wrote:
Waiting on line yesterday matinee. I noticed his forked goatee when he was full face, but by the time I got the phone out and set to max telephoto, all I got was this profile. But, as some hog once said, any camera is better than none. The only edit was to darken the sign a little.

Reply
Apr 1, 2019 07:31:49   #
tommy2 Loc: Fort Worth, Texas
 
daldds wrote:
...any camera is better than none...


Yep, absolutely!

Reply
Apr 1, 2019 07:37:57   #
joer Loc: Colorado/Illinois
 
berchman wrote:
Nice try, but an iPhone X would have done a better job of capturing the detail in the hair and skin.


And so would 50 other cameras but the reality is the op got the picture. A bird in the hand...

Reply
Apr 1, 2019 07:51:26   #
dave_roe Loc: Rome Italy
 
If you like it then it is a good shot.

A phone at times is better than nothing. Too bad it was not perfect to those that never have a bad shot.

Reply
 
 
Apr 1, 2019 08:09:44   #
Naptown Gaijin
 
Who is this, some celebrity, I presume?

Reply
Apr 1, 2019 09:20:57   #
berchman Loc: South Central PA
 
daldds wrote:
Really? My 6 texts, gets emails, and lets me talk to people...right?


My wife has an iPhone 6. The technical quality of the pictures she takes does not match the quality of my iPhone X. The only reason I spent the obscene amount of money on the X was for the camera.

Reply
Apr 1, 2019 10:06:05   #
daldds Loc: NYC
 
I understand, and appreciate that the X can and does take some awesome shots...looking on the screen. My step-daughter has one. Probably it can do most of what my cameras from 20 years ago could do.
I also know that there are countless youngsters out there (I'm 84; that's almost everyone, to me) who are not at all interested in printing, or enlarging, or pp. They enjoy their photos as is for personal use and social media. Great for them. I'm not of that group.
A couple of days ago, I posted some composites of pelicans being pelicans. Your X could not even begin to capture those separate images. Over the past years, I have posted other shots which could not have been captured with a cell phone camera. Yes, it's easier to carry just a cell phone, but none to date has the sensor or lens to meet my needs.
So, I would rather spend 4 figure money on a new lens, or even my pocket Sony RX100 VI.
Btw, as an aside, how about that guy who tried a selfie overlooking the Grand Canyon with a cell phone?

Reply
Apr 1, 2019 10:17:09   #
berchman Loc: South Central PA
 
daldds wrote:
I understand, and appreciate that the X can and does take some awesome shots...looking on the screen. My step-daughter has one. Probably it can do most of what my cameras from 20 years ago could do.
I also know that there are countless youngsters out there (I'm 84; that's almost everyone, to me) who are not at all interested in printing, or enlarging, or pp. They enjoy their photos as is for personal use and social media. Great for them. I'm not of that group.
A couple of days ago, I posted some composites of pelicans being pelicans. Your X could not even begin to capture those separate images. Over the past years, I have posted other shots which could not have been captured with a cell phone camera. Yes, it's easier to carry just a cell phone, but none to date has the sensor or lens to meet my needs.
So, I would rather spend 4 figure money on a new lens, or even my pocket Sony RX100 VI.
Btw, as an aside, how about that guy who tried a selfie overlooking the Grand Canyon with a cell phone?
I understand, and appreciate that the X can and do... (show quote)


When I have my two Fuji X-T3's with me, one with the Fuji 50-140 f/2.8, the other with the 16 f/1.4, I use them instead of the iPhone X.

Reply
 
 
Apr 2, 2019 08:12:39   #
JimBart Loc: Western Michigan
 
Good shot since I would have been able to shoot with an iPhone 5s. Not too many older out there

Reply
Apr 2, 2019 11:15:57   #
Earnest Botello Loc: Hockley, Texas
 
Very good shot.

Reply
Apr 2, 2019 14:11:38   #
Paul J. Svetlik Loc: Colorado
 
Not too bad - for a telephone?

Reply
Apr 2, 2019 14:42:20   #
davyboy Loc: Anoka Mn.
 
daldds wrote:
Waiting on line yesterday matinee. I noticed his forked goatee when he was full face, but by the time I got the phone out and set to max telephoto, all I got was this profile. But, as some hog once said, any camera is better than none. The only edit was to darken the sign a little.


I think it was a beautiful capture! I have an iPhone XR and I don’t know how good the camera is. Don’t use it enough

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.