cjc2 wrote:
I noticed, but that's called stealing the thread and can lead to others not hearing your glowing advice. Fixed FL lenses, especially fast ones, are very useful with indoor sports, but I have yet to meet a gym where I couldn't use my 70-200 if I wanted to. If I can get behind the basket I also like 50 and 35 lenses. Best of luck.
I wish you lived closer, then you could come shoot with me one day in the gym and the gymnastics venues that I shoot in. They use banks of fluorescent lights to light the gymnasium and the light level is right at the light level required for public occupancy in a building in the state of NC. There are no LED or halogen lights available. It is similar to shooting inside a church or the movie theatre before the lights dim for the show. Your 70-200mm is only going to get you 18-20K ISO and noisy images. I have been doing this for 2 years and the first year, I struggled with the 70-200mm and every option of shutter speed available and you simply cannot make a decent image. There is just no light available. So the 2nd year, I bought the faster lenses and a Nikon D3s and it was a miracle what I could now get. Now I can get an ISO of 6-8k and it is like shooting in sunshine. You gotta remember that these high school gyms and amateur gymnastics are not set up for ESPN broadcasts so the money is not allocated in the budget for bright lighting---only the minimum designed to meet the Safety Code for the state. High school staff does not consider the possibility of anyone ever wanting to take Sports Illustrated covers there. I am so thankful that I was able to get this combo of equipment to get a decent image to work with. And then a few months ago, AI Clear came out and it was another leap forward with noise removal and sharpening on those images. So I am fairly well satisfied right now with what I can do on a retiree's budget. If I had paying customers and a profitable business, I would have the D5 and that new 500mm FP lens.