Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
D7200 vs D500
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
Mar 20, 2019 08:42:41   #
camerapapi Loc: Miami, Fl.
 
I like the answer given to you by CO because indeed less pixels to process makes the camera shoot faster. I also agree with him that larger pixels collect light better.

Reply
Mar 20, 2019 09:28:52   #
awis01
 
larryepage wrote:
After using a D500 for about a month, my assessment of that model is quite different from the one that is commonly accepted on this site (mostly, I think, by folks who have never shot a D500 ). Far from being a "sports camera" (whatever that is), the D500 is a very outstanding all-around camera.

In actual use, its controls provide quick, easy, and direct access to all shooting controls. Many other very useful options are easily available through the menus.

Because it allows an XQD card to be used to capture and store images, there would have been no problem implementing the same frame rate with a 24MP sensor. Rather, I believe that 21MP was chosen because it results in almost the identical pixel pitch of the D850, and, in fact, D500 images are spookily similar to those from the D850 in overall image "character." Low light performance is also very similar, although the slightly older technology isn't quite a perfect match.

I held out for a long time before buying a D500, mostly because I had a lot of the same misconceptions I still read about here. I now regret my delay, and the D500 with the Nikkor 17-55mm f2.8 lens has become my everyday camera, with the D810 and D850 right now being held for more specialized projects.


I'm not one for a lot of hype, but the D500 is every bit the DX camera that the D850 was ballyhooed to be for FX.
After using a D500 for about a month, my assessmen... (show quote)


I have 2 D-500's. I had to make a choice between them and the 850. I went with the 500's because of the longer reach of the crop sensor. I have never regretted my choice. I completely agree with Larry.

Reply
Mar 20, 2019 10:01:33   #
Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan
 
The D500 is a whole lot better than the D300 (which competed against the D7200 at one time) of which I have both.

Reply
 
 
Mar 20, 2019 10:33:43   #
mas24 Loc: Southern CA
 
david vt wrote:
IYHO! I regularly use the two slots of my 7200 for jpeg plus raw for different needs, which the D7500 cannot do. While there are trade-offs between the two, it is a matter of your needs which one is better.

I do think that, as an aging and obsolete model, the 7200 is right now a great value and good kit deals can be had.


The D7200 is an excellent camera. The D7100/7200 have dual SD memory card slots. Both cameras are now discontinued. Dual SD card slots are good to have for many. But, not absolutely necessary. The successor to the D7500, might very well come with dual memory card slots. Who knows?

Reply
Mar 20, 2019 10:52:46   #
SuperFly48 Loc: NE ILLINOIS
 
I have this ongoing debate with an acquaintance....his D500 vs my D850. He tells me all the great things about his D500. He started with a preowned D5xxx, got a D7200, then a D500 a couple of months ago. Just last week he decided he wanted/needed an FX Nikon body so shopped around and got a deal on a D700 just to have an FX body. Hey, it's his money; it's your money; do what you want with it. If you love the D500, good for you. I got tired of waiting for the D300 replacement; bought a D7100, in fact had two D7100's. Decided I wanted more resolution, sold off a D7100, was set to get a D810 then the D850 got announced. My D7100 augments my D850 which is my preferred body now. BY THE WAY I have never seen any of his shots from any of his Nikon bodies.

Reply
Mar 20, 2019 10:57:35   #
DaveyDitzer Loc: Western PA
 
OP: Thanks to all who responded. As is usually the case here, I learned a lot from your responses. I appreciate the members of this site.

Reply
Mar 20, 2019 11:42:35   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
SuperFly48 wrote:
I have this ongoing debate with an acquaintance....his D500 vs my D850. He tells me all the great things about his D500. He started with a preowned D5xxx, got a D7200, then a D500 a couple of months ago. Just last week he decided he wanted/needed an FX Nikon body so shopped around and got a deal on a D700 just to have an FX body. Hey, it's his money; it's your money; do what you want with it. If you love the D500, good for you. I got tired of waiting for the D300 replacement; bought a D7100, in fact had two D7100's. Decided I wanted more resolution, sold off a D7100, was set to get a D810 then the D850 got announced. My D7100 augments my D850 which is my preferred body now. BY THE WAY I have never seen any of his shots from any of his Nikon bodies.
I have this ongoing debate with an acquaintance...... (show quote)


I own and shoot the D850 and D500 for wildlife in Florida. It APPEARS I am getting better results with the D850, I just wish it had the reach of my D500. Yes, I am aware I can crop more with the D850 but I can still wish. What is needed is a Nikon D550 with the same megapixel count of the D850, now there would be a camera.

Reply
 
 
Mar 20, 2019 11:50:22   #
DaveyDitzer Loc: Western PA
 
billnikon wrote:
What is needed is a Nikon D550 with the same megapixel count of the D850, now there would be a camera.

If the higher MP count of the D850 does not permit enough cropping, then wouldn't a greater telephoto reach attain the same objective as a dream D550? I'm thinking a high quality 1.4 or 1.7 extender.

Reply
Mar 20, 2019 11:56:20   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
DaveyDitzer wrote:
If the higher MP count of the D850 does not permit enough cropping, then wouldn't a greater telephoto reach attain the same objective as a dream D550? I'm thinking a high quality 1.4 or 1.7 extender.


There has not been an extender made that maintains or increases image quality.

Reply
Mar 20, 2019 13:38:06   #
Michael Sabetsky Loc: Rockledge, Florida
 
Bill. How would you compare the D500, D850 & the D5. I know the big difference between the D500 & D5 is one is DX & the other FX respectively. How does the D850 get in the mix with the two of those since the D5 & D850 have the same sensors. I do love the XQD memory card & my D5 had two slots for them. My backup camera D300 uses the CF card & there is no comparison between the two cards. I love my D5.

Reply
Mar 20, 2019 13:48:05   #
Chris T Loc: from England across the pond to New England
 
billnikon wrote:
You would have to ask Nikon, 1-800-645-6687 if you wanted the CORRECT answer.
That said, there is a LOT of differences in the two bodies.
Most important differences are
The D500 has the Exceed 5 processor, the D7200 has the Exceed 4 processor. Enough said.
The D500 has GROUP AUTO FOCUS (the best focusing system available for action shots), the D7200 does not.
The D500 has a separate focusing engine, the D7200 does not. (this means your action shots SHOULD be better)
The D500 can shoot at 10 fps, the D7200 cannot.
The D500 has two slots, one slot is for the new XQD card, a necessary card for fast shooting and buffering. The D7200 does not have this slot.
Finally, I have owned both camera's, the D7200 cannot match the D500 for action shots.
And finally, folks who only shop MP may be missing something.
You would have to ask Nikon, 1-800-645-6687 if you... (show quote)


Bill … the Nikon CPU is known as an Exspeed … not an Exceed …


Reply
 
 
Mar 20, 2019 13:48:28   #
Michael Sabetsky Loc: Rockledge, Florida
 
Bill. I have upgraded since I saw you last. I now have the D5. It may not have the amount of Mega-pixels as the D850 but it does one hell of a job. Most of the time I don't use my 910 flash. I also love the XQD memory card. Sure beats the CF card we used in the D300 which I now use as my backup camera. Don't do a lot of photography lately cause of health reasons & not working but hopefully that will change soon with GOD's help. Take care. Michael.

Reply
Mar 20, 2019 13:52:20   #
Chris T Loc: from England across the pond to New England
 
billnikon wrote:
There has not been an extender made that maintains or increases image quality.


Oh, yeah, Bill? …. Look at the latest designs from Metabones and Fotodiox - the ones w/ the Speed Booster!

Reply
Mar 20, 2019 14:16:55   #
Bill_de Loc: US
 
Chris T wrote:
Oh, yeah, Bill? …. Look at the latest designs from Metabones and Fotodiox - the ones w/ the Speed Booster!


What is your experience with them?

If you have read any reviews can you point to them?


----

Reply
Mar 20, 2019 14:43:31   #
Ched49 Loc: Pittsburgh, Pa.
 
DaveyDitzer wrote:
Can anyone offer a short explanation why the D7200 is offered with a 24mp sensor and the "advanced" , top-of-the-line D500 with a ~21mp sensor?
Looks like you are caught up in the mega-pixel wars started by the camera companies to be used as a marketing leverage and it's still going strong. Mega pixels aren't everything.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.