Rubio Announces He'll Introduce Amendment To Keep SCOTUS Seats At 9 (Page 2): Yes, but if you are going to mess with the constitution do it with some thought and remedy the oversight...

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

Elaine2025 wrote:

This is about democrats trying to gain power. They don't want Trump possibly appointing one or two more. They are paving the way to get their guys on the court. Just more crap from dems.

Yes, but if you are going to mess with the constitution do it with some thought and remedy the oversight of an unrestrained SCOTUS.

RichieC Loc: Adirondacks

Frank T wrote:

E*******l College dies a natural death if enough states sign on to the National Popular V**e Compact. I believe at last count they had 186 e*******l v**es and will need 270 to be 100% effective.

So your plan depends on what, 48 states give up any say their citizens have to say about choosing a president who will govern them and leave it up to a handful of cities? And you are the party concerned about v**er suppression ? This will promote major v**er apathy and lead to secession..

But the dims have a plan- make 16 year olds, who can't drink or drive past 9 or vape or smoke because "their brains aren't developed enough at that age" v**e ( With those credentials- we know who the Dims believe they will v**e for) and then also allow i*****l a***ns to v**e- I mean truck in a couple of plane loads into a tight race from what - italy? ", make it easy for people to v**e more than once with no v**er ID laws.

ROFL Go feed your unicorn some rainbows.

Angmo

RichieC wrote:

So your plan depends on what, 48 states give up an... (show quote)

At least the lefties realize all their v**es come from folks with undeveloped brains. Reading what lefties write here in the attic firms up that point.

Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa

EyeSawYou wrote:

Remember when desperate Democrats tried to bully state e*****rates to change their states v**e to from Trump to Hillary? LOL

Frank T Loc: New York, NY

RichieC wrote:

So your plan depends on what, 48 states give up an... (show quote)

So, what the National Popular V**e Compact or the elimination of the E*******l College would actually accomplish is that every v**e would be worth 1 v**e. Right now if you live in a state that the Democrats win by 100 v**es, the entire e*******l college v**es, for that state, go to the Democrats. If you used the popular v**e in a state that let's say has 1 million v**ers in, it that would mean that 490,900 v**es would go the Republican candidate and 500,100 v**es would go to the Democrats. Seems a lot more fair to me?

So tell me, how do you think this is somehow unfair? I really don't understand your position once I subtract the fact that the Republicans have won the Presidency twice in the recent past when they lost the popular v**e I'm left with the opinion that you think unf**r e******ns are to your advantage.

Angmo

Frank T wrote:

So, what the National Popular V**e Compact or the ... (show quote)

So, apparently you have not studied history, facts, t***h and the development and design of the country.

You bring false premise and scream like a spoiled entitled child.

Please study up on history. Your words are simply backwards.

You state that it’s only fair if Dems win. The system of the e*******l college was designed to be fair. You prove it.

Put real simply, the EC seeks to avoid the tyranny of the majority.

Frank T Loc: New York, NY

Angmo wrote:

So, apparently you have not studied history, facts, t***h and the development and design of the country.

You bring false premise and scream like a spoiled entitled child.

Please study up on history. Your words are simply backwards.

You state that it’s only fair if Dems win. The system of the e*******l college was designed to be fair. You prove it.

Put real simply, the EC seeks to avoid the tyranny of the majority.

Are you kidding me?
Tyranny of the majority?
What is wrong with you?

Angmo

Frank T wrote:

Are you kidding me?
Tyranny of the majority?
What is wrong with you?

The wrong is on your side. Simply study unedited history. It’s all there. T***h and fact.

Frank T Loc: New York, NY

Angmo wrote:

The wrong is on your side. Simply study unedited history. It’s all there. T***h and fact.

OMG. There are no words to describe your lack of reason and intelligence.

Angmo

Frank T wrote:

OMG. There are no words to describe your lack of reason and intelligence.

Just study. I can explain it for you but simply cannot understand it for you.

Proof: tells us your knowdeldge of the development of the EC

Prediction: you will evade and deflect. Personal attacks and never answer with the actual history design and development of the EC.

Again cliff notes: It seeks to avoid the tyranny of the majority.

More proof: Please explain exactly how the EC works.

All youve done is show evil leftie Dems will try to destroy anything standing in their way to obtain power. If the EC helped them, they defend it, once in a while it hurt them, they wanna destroy it. Evil dem lefties are a minority in this country so you will lie c***t steal and k**l to obtain power.

Just like evil leftie dem Harry Reid’s nuclear option. Now Trump gets his appointees with a simple majority.

Evil dem lefties simply cannot think. You desire Venezuela’s result here in my country. You will fail.

#walkaway

Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa

Frank T wrote:

So, what the National Popular V**e Compact or the ... (show quote)

Buffoon. New York, California, Illinois and Massachusetts will decide the winner of every e******n. That is where the population is. But that is what the democrats want.

hondo812 Loc: Massachusetts

Elaine2025 wrote:

Buffoon. New York, California, Illinois and Massachusetts will decide the winner of every e******n. That is where the population is. But that is what the democrats want.

Massachusetts has like 11 e*******l v**es. Trust me, this state isn't the deciding factor....ever. You left out Texas and Florida.

If you can get the 5-6 million i******s out of Cali then their number will drop from it's current 55 to 50 or so.

Angmo

hondo812 wrote:

Massachusetts has like 11 e*******l v**es. Trust me, this state isn't the deciding factor....ever. You left out Texas and Florida.

If you can get the 5-6 million i******s out of Cali then their number will drop from it's current 55 to 50 or so.

Then Dems will lose again.

They need to legalize the i*****l a***n v**e along with unlawfully registering them.

If i*****l a***ns all v**e republican, Dems would have the wall up in 8 days and all criminal trespassers deported.

Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa

hondo812 wrote:

Massachusetts has like 11 e*******l v**es. Trust me, this state isn't the deciding factor....ever. You left out Texas and Florida.

If you can get the 5-6 million i******s out of Cali then their number will drop from it's current 55 to 50 or so.

Either way, one v**e counts for nothing, where the population is will decide for the country.

John_F Loc: Minneapolis, MN

Your ignorance is obvious. Here are the facts.

Roosevelt sought passage of the Judiciary Reorganization Bill of 1937 (the "court packing plan"), which would have expanded the size of the Supreme Court of the United States. The bipartisan Conservative Coalition that formed in 1937 prevented passage of the bill and blocked the implementation of further New Deal programs and reforms.

I thoroughly understand the words.

Angmo wrote:

You don’t get it. That’s all.