Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Shutter shock, how can that be?
Page 1 of 2 next>
Mar 2, 2019 21:26:00   #
kenArchi Loc: Seal Beach, CA
 
I thought eliminating the mirror eliminates vibrations.
So then mirrorless cameras are having shutter shock?
I do see it is being corrected by the mfrs.
Was shutter shock a really big concern?

When I use mirror lock-up, I do not
see any shutter shock symptoms of blurry photos.

Reply
Mar 2, 2019 21:27:55   #
rgrenaderphoto Loc: Hollywood, CA
 
What do you mean by "shutter shock"

Reply
Mar 2, 2019 21:29:51   #
RWR Loc: La Mesa, CA
 
rgrenaderphoto wrote:
What do you mean by "shutter shock"

Shutter vibration.

Reply
 
 
Mar 2, 2019 21:30:28   #
kenArchi Loc: Seal Beach, CA
 
Reading reviews of mirrorless cameras, example the G85 Panasonic has shutter shock. And other cameras.

Reply
Mar 2, 2019 21:36:36   #
LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America
 
Any mechanical movement induced some vibration.

Basic Newtonian physics.

Reply
Mar 2, 2019 23:16:01   #
bsprague Loc: Lacey, WA, USA
 
A few months after I got my favorite camera, some reviewers said it suffered from shutter shock. To prove it they took pictures of things like newspaper want ads and enlarged to about 400%. I also have the lens that is supposed to contribute to it the most. I've never been able to duplicate the problem even though I've tried.

It (theoretically) occurs at shutter speeds at around 1/60th or 1/125th but only with mechanical shutter selected. It never occurs when electronic shutter is selected.

There are other advantages to electronic shutter but it can produce rolling shutter effect. When shooting fast moving subjects, mechanical shutter and high shutter speeds are better to freeze the motion anyway.

The camera maker provided a firmware upgrade with a work around. The camera originally came with two shutter choices, mechanical or electronic. Now it has a third, automatic. In automatic it knows what lens is mounted and avoids any troublesome shutter speeds in manual shutter shooting.

In practical use, shooting real subjects, is is a non issue. I've never identified the effect in any image I've shot.

Reply
Mar 2, 2019 23:17:24   #
bsprague Loc: Lacey, WA, USA
 
kenArchi wrote:
Reading reviews of mirrorless cameras, example the G85 Panasonic has shutter shock. And other cameras.


Immediately after the G85, Panasonic cameras had a new shutter that doesn't do it.

Reply
 
 
Mar 3, 2019 05:59:11   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
bsprague wrote:
To prove it they took pictures of things like newspaper want ads and enlarged to about 400%.

It (theoretically) occurs at shutter speeds at around 1/60th or 1/125th but only with mechanical shutter selected. It never occurs when electronic shutter is selected


That's one problem with a lot of "proof." It doesn't apply to real world use. Yes, it proves there is some vibration, but they had to enlarge tiny print 400% to show the effect.

It's funny how shutter/mirror vibration affects the image at only certain exposure times. Going slower often negates the effect of vibration. I tried to find articles about that, but no luck.

Reply
Mar 3, 2019 08:31:23   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
kenArchi wrote:
I thought eliminating the mirror eliminates vibrations.
So then mirrorless cameras are having shutter shock?
I do see it is being corrected by the mfrs.
Was shutter shock a really big concern?

When I use mirror lock-up, I do not
see any shutter shock symptoms of blurry photos.


As others have said any mechanical movement causes vibrations.
That includes the shutter and levers slapping the aperture open back and forth.

In the real world this is meaningless.
400% magnification is meaningless in the real world. Only the pixel peepers on this site worry about such silly things.
Finally if you are concerned, use your electronic shutter only, leave the aperture wide open, turn off IS, turn off AF, fasten the camera to an anvil on an isolation foundation and hope a train or big truck does not drive by.
Don't worry about it for most all you do.

Reply
Mar 3, 2019 09:32:11   #
tomcat
 
bsprague wrote:
A few months after I got my favorite camera, some reviewers said it suffered from shutter shock. To prove it they took pictures of things like newspaper want ads and enlarged to about 400%. I also have the lens that is supposed to contribute to it the most. I've never been able to duplicate the problem even though I've tried.

It (theoretically) occurs at shutter speeds at around 1/60th or 1/125th but only with mechanical shutter selected. It never occurs when electronic shutter is selected.

There are other advantages to electronic shutter but it can produce rolling shutter effect. When shooting fast moving subjects, mechanical shutter and high shutter speeds are better to freeze the motion anyway.

The camera maker provided a firmware upgrade with a work around. The camera originally came with two shutter choices, mechanical or electronic. Now it has a third, automatic. In automatic it knows what lens is mounted and avoids any troublesome shutter speeds in manual shutter shooting.

In practical use, shooting real subjects, is is a non issue. I've never identified the effect in any image I've shot.
A few months after I got my favorite camera, some ... (show quote)


Sigh......"and these were supposed to solve so many problems"..... lol

Reply
Mar 3, 2019 09:40:39   #
fetzler Loc: North West PA
 
I regular photography shutter shock or vibration is not usually an issue. I have done high magnification macros. In this case it is important. On Nikon I move the mirror up 3 sec early. (This is a menu option) On Olympus I use the anti-shock mode. Silent mode might be even better but for Olympus there are significant restrictions when using flash.

Reply
 
 
Mar 3, 2019 09:52:08   #
bsprague Loc: Lacey, WA, USA
 
tomcat wrote:
Sigh......"and these were supposed to solve so many problems"..... lol


Why are you sighing and LOLing? I didn't write that "these" had "problems". I wrote that my favorite camera had been criticized on forums for having an imagined quirk that I couldn't duplicate.

Reply
Mar 3, 2019 10:10:09   #
boberic Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander
 
Architect1776 wrote:
As others have said any mechanical movement causes vibrations.
That includes the shutter and levers slapping the aperture open back and forth.

In the real world this is meaningless.
400% magnification is meaningless in the real world. Only the pixel peepers on this site worry about such silly things.
Finally if you are concerned, use your electronic shutter only, leave the aperture wide open, turn off IS, turn off AF, fasten the camera to an anvil on an isolation foundation and hope a train or big truck does not drive by.
Don't worry about it for most all you do.
As others have said any mechanical movement causes... (show quote)


This may sound a little silly, but is still true. Movement causes movement. If any part of anything moves, then the whole thing moves. It's only a matter of "how much"

Reply
Mar 3, 2019 10:13:49   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
boberic wrote:
This may sound a little silly, but is still true. Movement causes movement. If any part of anything moves, then the whole thing moves. It's only a matter of "how much"



Reply
Mar 3, 2019 10:33:35   #
bsprague Loc: Lacey, WA, USA
 
In the case of Panasonic, my GX8 was the last of a series that used a particular shutter. The next camera released had a shutter that didn't shock. Somehow the shutter movement one way was balanced by something that moved the other way. The GH5 and G9 flagship models do not get accused of having shutter shock.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.