Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Lens help
Page <prev 2 of 2
Mar 2, 2019 11:38:06   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
Thomas902 wrote:
"...The Nikon 200-500... ...sold my Nikon 300 2.8 and 200-400 4 because the 200-500 was much lighter and compared to both lenses in image quality..." Thank you billnikon... I agree that from 200 through 400mm it is close to parody with the AF-S 200-400mm IF ED VR albeit it's build quality isn't... in fact I can't use it for sports since it has to be locked in place before use.... Yes I've had it "jump" out of it's rotational tract and freeze up... That was before I carefully studied Nikon's fine print that it has to locked down before use... Also it's not weather sealed and even worst since it's a "pumper" it is highly prone to internal dust contamination... Nope, I love and cherish my 200-400mm which is literally the cat's meow... especially on a soccer pitch... and as Gene51 mentioned the 200-500 isn't at it's best at 500mm (in fact I have a piece of white tape marking 450mm which I try not to go beyond)

Ok I still love and use the 200-500mm for fashion editorials and beauty genre since it's awesome VR (4 stops) allows hand holding (not possible with the 200-400mm unless you're maybe a Navy Seal...}

Below is the 200-500 at 460mm... btw, I'm a commercial shooter... not interested in birds... sorry
.
"...The Nikon 200-500... ...sold my Nikon 30... (show quote)


Thomas - I totally agree with everything you said - This was a test shot I did just shortly after I got my 150-600 Sport.

I also totally agree with Billnikon's post - you get what you pay for - but I will add a second thought to that - you never get what you don't pay for. . . Just sayin'

These were taken using a D800 and the Sigma at 600mm, F8, ISO 400 and 1/25 sec - I was trying to verify Sigma owners' claims of 3.5 - 4 stops stabilization. First image is uncropped, second is cropped and third is cropped even more. I couldn't find any evidence of movement. I found on subsequent testing that it is just as sharp at F7.1 as it at F8, and backing off 600mm did not improve image quality. I shoot mostly wildlife and landscape, and I also own a 600mmF4 which I no longer use much. I don't miss the production involved in packing the big lens, tripod, gimbal, etc into a backpack - with the camera and battery grip nearly 30lbs of gear - assembling everything on site, then picking everything up to move to another location, etc. Now I just have the lens on a Black Rapid sling strap, and the camera/lens only weighs a little under 8.5 lbs - something I can hike all day with.

In all honesty, I was all set to pull the trigger on the Nikkor, until I borrowed a Sigma Sport - that was a real game-changer - it had everything I wanted, and left me wanting for nothing. That being said, if I had to do it all over again, I'd likely get the Tamron G2 - which is everything the Sigma Sport is, less 2 lbs.


(Download)


(Download)



Reply
Mar 2, 2019 14:22:04   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
Screamin Scott wrote:
I have a Tamron 150-600 G1 A011 that I use for my wildlife shots. There is a newer version, but it costs a bit more, beyond your budget. The G1 version you should be able to pick up used for less than $800



Reply
Mar 2, 2019 14:43:04   #
Blenheim Orange Loc: Michigan
 
oops, I posted in the wrong spot...

Reply
 
 
Mar 2, 2019 14:53:20   #
mas24 Loc: Southern CA
 
Through_MI_Eyes wrote:
I appreciate all the advise on DSLR. My lens recently got damaged...50-500 sigma for Nikon I used on my d3400. I know have 800 to spend on a new lens and want to use it for birding and would be shooting a distance away at some points. Love to hear any advise
. Check KEH. They might have a used lens that will meet your budget. Sometimes, you can't get what you need by setting a strict budget. You either have to settle for less. Or save more money to get what you want and need. Good luck.

Reply
Mar 2, 2019 15:05:22   #
MadMikeOne Loc: So. NJ Shore - a bit west of Atlantic City
 
Wags wrote:
MadMikeOne, why do you regret getting the newer version of the lens? I recently purchased a D500 and was thinking about doing the same thing you did.


The G2 has a little quirk that the 1st generation didn’t have. The switches on the G2 are positioned in such a way that I frequently inadvertently switch the focus from A to M. To be honest, though, it seems to be as much a result of my shooting style (mostly handheld) as the positioning of that switch. A few days ago, I just stuck a piece of gaffer tape to hold the switch in place. That should do the trick.Should have done that when I first noticed the problem. Other than that, I do like the lens.

A friend tried to convince me to get the Nikon 200-500 by loaning his to me one day when we were shooting together. At that point, I still had my Tammy G1 and my D7200. I just didn’t like the 200-500 on my D7200, so I kept my G1.

Reply
Mar 2, 2019 19:38:40   #
mas24 Loc: Southern CA
 
MadMikeOne wrote:
The G2 has a little quirk that the 1st generation didn’t have. The switches on the G2 are positioned in such a way that I frequently inadvertently switch the focus from A to M. To be honest, though, it seems to be as much a result of my shooting style (mostly handheld) as the positioning of that switch. A few days ago, I just stuck a piece of gaffer tape to hold the switch in place. That should do the trick.Should have done that when I first noticed the problem. Other than that, I do like the lens.

A friend tried to convince me to get the Nikon 200-500 by loaning his to me one day when we were shooting together. At that point, I still had my Tammy G1 and my D7200. I just didn’t like the 200-500 on my D7200, so I kept my G1.
The G2 has a little quirk that the 1st generation ... (show quote)


You might have a different opinion, if that Nikon 200-500mm was attached to a D500.

Reply
Mar 2, 2019 20:07:29   #
tetraq69 Loc: Billings Mt.
 
I might suggest mpb.com the tamron lens you were talking about lists for $669 This is not the G2 model

Reply
 
 
Mar 4, 2019 00:54:17   #
Bipod
 
Thomas902 wrote:
"...You don't say what sort of damage the old lens sustained,
and whether you've considered having it repaired..."

Thank you Bipod... my thoughts entirely... my financial adviser suggests to always review all alternatives before moving forward with any major purchase...

You're welcome. But a plain statement of the facts was more what I hoping for.
Instead, you took a weird,. oblique swipe at Sigma:
Quote:

If Sigma doesn't respond in a timely manner then you may understand why third party kit while enticingly cost effective for an initial investment is not a preferred choice by those who make a living with their craft...

Did Sigma fail to respond in a timely manner? That is what you are implying.

If you are going to slag a maniufacture, at least tell us the details so we can learn
from your experience.

Further, you sweepingly imply: aftermarket bad, OEM good. Might be true, might be false.
There are dozens of camear manufacturers--do they all respond more quickly than any
aftermarket lens maker? How do you know?

Then you claiming this of the opinion of "those who make a living from their craft". Really?
Did you conduct a survey? Judging by their posts to UHH, professionals don't agree on much
and use all sorts of different gear.

Are you "one of those who make a living from their craft or was that just blowing smoke?

If you know a camera manufactuer that always responds quickly and always does
quick and good repairs, don't keep it to yourself--please tell us! A lot of people would love to
find a company like that.

My own experience managing professional services taught me that manpower is always
limited and expertise is scarce. One can't just call a temp agency for a technical expert
on the company's products.

Therefore, any company can be slow to respond at certain times: busy periods,
holidays, snow storms, flu season. If you will consult your calendar, you will perhaps
understand why those who make a living from their craft refer to the present season as
"winter".
Quote:

"Birders" are decidedly not likely to be commercial shooters since there is virtually no market value in same... especially since the current dominance of cost effective stock imagery...

What does this have to do with anything? How the heck did "birders" come up?
Quote:

All the best on your journey Through_MI_Eyes

Huh? That's just weird.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.