Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Aftershot Pro 3
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Feb 27, 2019 11:46:51   #
redlegfrog
 
Any Aftershot pro 3 users? and what do you think of the software?

Reply
Feb 27, 2019 12:37:13   #
rjaywallace Loc: Wisconsin
 
Respectfully, this was asked and answered.

https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-580446-1.html

Reply
Feb 27, 2019 14:24:30   #
redlegfrog
 
rjaywallace wrote:
Respectfully, this was asked and answered.

https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-580446-1.html


Don't think so!

Reply
 
 
Feb 28, 2019 07:30:07   #
mwsilvers Loc: Central New Jersey
 
redlegfrog wrote:
Any Aftershot pro 3 users? and what do you think of the software?


It's very inexpensive when on sale but mediocre compared to just about any of the competition. I played with it for a couple of weeks when I compared eight different post processing software packages. You'd be far better off considering On1, Luminar, and Affinity Photo as alternative mid level, mid priced, post processing programs. After shot Pro has a weak implementation of tools and results in mostly poor to mediocre final images. In any competition someone has to come in last, and in this case it's After shot Pro.

Reply
Feb 28, 2019 07:57:38   #
tdozier3 Loc: Northern Illinois
 
Love it and no monthly fees

Reply
Feb 28, 2019 09:16:52   #
Jerry G Loc: Waterford, Michigan and Florida
 
Tried it and did not think it was as good as Raw Therapee. Might be just my lack of familiarity so I stick with what I know.

Reply
Feb 28, 2019 09:41:34   #
tdozier3 Loc: Northern Illinois
 
[quote=mwsilvers]It's very inexpensive when on sale but mediocre compared to just about any of the competition. I played with it for a couple of weeks when I compared eight different post processing software packages. You'd be far better off considering On1, Luminar, and Affinity Photo as alternative mid level, mid priced, post processing programs. After shot Pro has a weak implementation of tools and results in mostly poor to mediocre final images. In any competition someone has to come in last, and in this case.


Well I guess poor and mediocre is good enough for me. Haters gonna hate

Reply
 
 
Feb 28, 2019 10:49:47   #
mwsilvers Loc: Central New Jersey
 
[quote=tdozier3]
mwsilvers wrote:
It's very inexpensive when on sale but mediocre compared to just about any of the competition. I played with it for a couple of weeks when I compared eight different post processing software packages. You'd be far better off considering On1, Luminar, and Affinity Photo as alternative mid level, mid priced, post processing programs. After shot Pro has a weak implementation of tools and results in mostly poor to mediocre final images. In any competition someone has to come in last, and in this case.


Well I guess poor and mediocre is good enough for me. Haters gonna hate
It's very inexpensive when on sale but mediocre co... (show quote)

I didn't "hate" any of the software I tested. I evaluated 8 programs based on identical criteria and made a judgement based on the usability and the results. I treated Lightroom and Photoshop as a single package because they are so often used together. Over a two month period I evaluated and compared Lightroom/PhotoShop, PS Elements, ON1, Luminar, DXO PhotoLab, Affinity Photo, Capture One Pro 11 and AfterShot Pro 3. Among other things I was a professional software developer and tester before retirement.

I used the same test bed of Canon raw images with similar adjustments in all the programs, and spent an average of 15 solid hours for each application learning the features and how to get the best from them. There are many similarities between most post processing programs so learning new ones is not that difficult or time consuming once you are familiar with the general paradigm. Unfortunately AfterShot Pro 3 did much more poorly than any of the other programs I tested. Some of the limiting factors were the quality of the raw conversions, the limited range and quality of some of the tools, and some important tools which are missing in AfterShot Pro. This doesn't mean that AfterShot Pro is valueless or junk, but right now there are much better choices. Perhaps future versions will be more competitive.

I'm sorry if you felt insulted by my test results, but they are what they are. Have you had the opportunity of performing any extensive comparisons between AfterShot Pro 3 and any of it's competition?

Reply
Feb 28, 2019 11:10:34   #
rjaywallace Loc: Wisconsin
 
On1 and Capture One recommended

Reply
Feb 28, 2019 11:14:17   #
mwsilvers Loc: Central New Jersey
 
rjaywallace wrote:
On1 and Capture One recommended


Capture One Pro is, of course, expensive, top of the line, professional level software. ON1 is actually quite good with a lot of potential at a very competitive price point.

Reply
Feb 28, 2019 11:17:15   #
tdozier3 Loc: Northern Illinois
 
Sorry but, poor to mediocre shots sounds like you were calling it junk to me. There will always be something better, it's all about how much money you want to spend and what works for your needs. For me, I'm very happy with the results I'm getting with it.

Reply
 
 
Feb 28, 2019 11:21:47   #
mwsilvers Loc: Central New Jersey
 
tdozier3 wrote:
Sorry but, poor to mediocre shots sounds like you were calling it junk to me. There will always be something better, it's all about how much money you want to spend and what works for your needs. For me, I'm very happy with the results I'm getting with it.

Nothing wrong with using what works for you, especially when Aftershot Pro is on sale. But the reality is that among all the commercial post processing software I tested AfterShot Pro came in at the bottom, and it wasn't even close.

Reply
Feb 28, 2019 11:28:17   #
redlegfrog
 
mwsilvers wrote:
I didn't "hate" any of the software I tested. I evaluated 8 programs based on identical criteria and made a judgement based on the usability and the results. I treated Lightroom and Photoshop as a single package because they are so often used together. Over a two month period I evaluated and compared Lightroom/PhotoShop, PS Elements, ON1, Luminar, DXO PhotoLab, Affinity Photo, Capture One Pro 11 and AfterShot Pro 3. Among other things I was a professional software developer and tester before retirement.

I used the same test bed of Canon raw images with similar adjustments in all the programs, and spent an average of 15 solid hours for each application learning the features and how to get the best from them. There are many similarities between most post processing programs so learning new ones is not that difficult or time consuming once you are familiar with the general paradigm. Unfortunately AfterShot Pro 3 did much more poorly than any of the other programs I tested. Some of the limiting factors were the quality of the raw conversions, the limited range and quality of some of the tools, and some important tools which are missing in AfterShot Pro. This doesn't mean that AfterShot Pro is valueless or junk, but right now there are much better choices. Perhaps future versions will be more competitive.

I'm sorry if you felt insulted by my test results, but they are what they are. Have you had the opportunity of performing any extensive comparisons between AfterShot Pro 3 and any of it's competition?
I didn't "hate" any of the software I te... (show quote)


Thanks everyone for your input. Looks like I have more homework to do!
Tom

Reply
Feb 28, 2019 12:17:31   #
mwsilvers Loc: Central New Jersey
 
redlegfrog wrote:
Thanks everyone for your input. Looks like I have more homework to do!
Tom

If money is a factor I suggest you download the free 30-day full evaluation versions of ON1, Affinity Photo and Luminar to see which one meeting your requirements. Affinity Photo particularly has a lot of interesting special effects if that is important to you. If you want professional level software conversions of raw files then the choices, in no particular order, are Adobe's Lightroom CC, Phase One's Capture One Pro 12, and DXO's PhotoLab Elite 2.1 with the FilmPack Elite and Viewpoint add-ins.

Reply
Feb 28, 2019 12:26:40   #
redlegfrog
 
mwsilvers wrote:
If money is a factor I suggest you download the free 30-day full evaluation versions of ON1, Affinity Photo and Luminar to see which one meeting your requirements. Affinity Photo particularly has a lot of interesting special effects if that is important to you. If you want professional level software conversions of raw files then the choices, in no particular order, are Adobe's Lightroom CC, Phase One's Capture One Pro 12, and DXO's PhotoLab Elite 2.1 with the FilmPack Elite and Viewpoint add-ins.
If money is a factor I suggest you download the fr... (show quote)


My main interest at the moment is cataloging. I have quite a mess in my computer and decided its time to get organized

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.