Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Photo Gallery
Pikes Peak Colorado 2019
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Feb 20, 2019 09:46:37   #
SafetySam Loc: Colorado
 
cameraf4 wrote:
Welcome, Sam. Nice shot. I have some images from just about the same spot. Like DrNikon, I generally prefer a tad more contrast, though not as much as the Doc. It looks like you used "Standard" Picture Control if you shot it as JPG. If that is the case, you may want to try "Landscape" or even "Vivid" for a scene like this. Adds a bit more "punch."
BTW, I use a tripod for most of my scapes, but 1/500sec at 62mm should be good enough to give you shake-free images, even with an 810. So don't be afraid to experiment "on the road."
Welcome back to the fold. Look forward to seeing more of your shots.
Welcome, Sam. Nice shot. I have some images from j... (show quote)


Thanks for your comment. I am getting more used to the weight of the camera and lenses but still have to get the digital mindset of shutter speed (still tied to the film speed concept).

Reply
Feb 20, 2019 10:25:07   #
SafetySam Loc: Colorado
 
Dr.Nikon wrote:
#1 was my adjusted model that I said was a starting point .. I did some detail and and normal slider action in a few programs .. never used HDR on any of them
The others were just to show some different versions to show more angry look of the sky and overall storm coming .., but # 1 was my version adjusted normally ..

I seldom ever shoot less than 500 on my Landscape ...and up to 1200 … especially if I am hand holding .. and Mostly the 24-70 2.8


Thank you for your efforts on the re-post . . I like your #1 as it's more what I saw . .

I am learning . . the D810 was a step up from the D7200 set (same lenses but for the DX crop) and the mass is quite a bit different as well as the higher MP count showing the imperfections that the crop sensor didn't emphasize.

I have been concentrating on the Aperture priority, and need to get more into the Manual mode with more shutter speed - found it also helps on the exposure side too.

Lot's to relearn and much new techniques, equipment, software, on and on and on, but the tripod thing . . I still have one that weighs 10 lbs for the 4x5 and with the new carbon fiber one in my bag, I will be using it more even for quick shots that come up if possible . .

Thanks again.

Reply
Feb 20, 2019 10:51:40   #
SafetySam Loc: Colorado
 
anotherview wrote:
You have a fine photograph needing very little attention to maximize its potential.

I called it up in a simple photo editor that comes with Microsoft Windows, and then I cropped it slightly for visual balance. Now, the sky and foreground take up about equal space.

You will notice that the bushes on the slopes look dark. They present a common problem. You might try setting the black point to tease out some tonal defintion here. In Adobe Camera Raw, you could use the Targeted Adjustment Tool to to add some luminance to the bushes.

Others here more skilled could help you with brightening these bushes.

Otherwise, your photograph stands out as a worthy product.
You have a fine photograph needing very little att... (show quote)


Thanks anotherview! I appreciate your comments and I will try the luminance addition to the hillside . . but it was in deeper cloud shadow, so don't want to detract that . .

Reply
 
 
Feb 20, 2019 10:56:59   #
SafetySam Loc: Colorado
 
billbarcus wrote:
Thank you for the information. Based on your photography background you'll fall in love with the D810. It's a great camera ... but at times I think 36 MP is too much and 24 is just fine. My backup D610 does a pretty good job at 24. But then again, having been potty trained with a 12 MP S2 Pro upon leaving the film world back in the day, that camera produced outstanding IQ photos, especially shooting Nikon f/2.8 lenses. I'm a firm believer in the use of a tripod and shutter release, yet there are many times it doesn't quite pan out like that. Thanks for sharing your nice photo and information.
Thank you for the information. Based on your phot... (show quote)


Thanks billbarcus! Yep, I have a D7200 with the same lenses (DX) which produced good image quality, and I find the D810 quite the heavy mass to control, but I am getting the hang of the heaver camera and lens combination. Wanted the "more MP" syndrome for better detail and clarity, but I am having to do better with getting better quality images. Tripod will help, but like you say, need to be prepared for those times when there isn't time to "plan" . .

Reply
Feb 20, 2019 10:57:09   #
DJ Mills Loc: Idaho
 
Great work!
Thanks for sharing.
👍👍👍

Reply
Feb 20, 2019 10:58:31   #
SafetySam Loc: Colorado
 
cameraf4 wrote:
Welcome, Sam. Nice shot. I have some images from just about the same spot. Like DrNikon, I generally prefer a tad more contrast, though not as much as the Doc. It looks like you used "Standard" Picture Control if you shot it as JPG. If that is the case, you may want to try "Landscape" or even "Vivid" for a scene like this. Adds a bit more "punch."
BTW, I use a tripod for most of my scapes, but 1/500sec at 62mm should be good enough to give you shake-free images, even with an 810. So don't be afraid to experiment "on the road."
Welcome back to the fold. Look forward to seeing more of your shots.
Welcome, Sam. Nice shot. I have some images from j... (show quote)


Thanks cameraaf4! Nice to be back . . . !

Reply
Feb 20, 2019 10:59:58   #
SafetySam Loc: Colorado
 
Swamp-Cork wrote:
Welcome, Sam and a very beautiful download!


Thanks Swamp-Cork! I appreciate your taking the time to look!

Reply
 
 
Feb 20, 2019 11:01:05   #
SafetySam Loc: Colorado
 
DJ Mills wrote:
Great work!
Thanks for sharing.
👍👍👍


Thanks DJ Mills! I appreciate your taking the time to look!

Reply
Feb 20, 2019 11:04:40   #
SafetySam Loc: Colorado
 
Dr.Nikon wrote:
I’m working on it now .., it should be a little more clear .. you said you have the holy grail of lenses...and as I went from a D800E to a D810 with the best Nikon glass .. I would know .., I now shoot with a D850 and the same glass ...
That being said ... the transmission of the picture via the internet and a lot of other factors can make a perfectly clear image .., not so clear ...case in point .. if you want to post your clear picture on FaceBook and have use ,, sharpening or clarity sliders in a photo program .. and post on FaceBook ..wow not so clear..sharpening sliders not overdone will be alright on Post in FaceBook .. however the “clarity” slider will make it worse when you post .. ..Anyway .., I’m working on your picture now to see what’s up ...
I’m working on it now .., it should be a little mo... (show quote)


Found the problem with the sharpness - I think . . . I had to reduce size to upload to the UHH . . went from 47MB to 17MB . . could that have been the issue with reduced sharpness? I checked the original image, and there is very little softness in the distant or foreground . . I think there is some very slight camera movement, but not sure if it's that or the focus depth . .

Reply
Feb 20, 2019 11:11:06   #
SafetySam Loc: Colorado
 
donrosshill wrote:
You bring back a lot of memories good and bad. I also made my living in Imaging from 1956 to present. Spent lots of time behind a View camera with a black cloth over my head. Retired and enjoying the new digital age.
Love your Mountain view.
Don
You bring back a lot of memories good and bad. I a... (show quote)


Thanks donrosshill! I appreciate your taking the time to look! Yep, many good and bad memories come to mind . . always wondered what others were doing when my head was under the "hood" . . . I too expect to gain much enjoyment from the "new" digital foray!

Reply
Feb 20, 2019 11:36:10   #
gilpog
 
I also prefer the original shot. But there seems to be a road sign at the bottom right of the image. I would remove that (cloning out). I am a strong user of gradients in my photography and I would use that tool to darken slightly the foreground so that the eye is appropriately drawn to the center of the image which is very good.

Reply
 
 
Feb 20, 2019 12:16:59   #
billbarcus Loc: IPNW
 
And, thank you SafetySam!

What I am about to say is NOT aimed at you ... and, I'm not throwing rocks at anyone in particular out here in UHH land:

"Photoshop doesn't make a Bad Picture Good; it makes a Bad Picture BIG." --- John Shaw

John Shaw taught me more about Photography than any one mentor I ever learned under. That was 35 years ago, and today I continue to follow his teachings and sound advice. If there is anyone here in UHH land that is serious about their photography - amateur or pro - my recommendation is to pull up a chair in Shaw's classroom of photography books and start taking meticulous notes. You won't find him on a YouTube channel talking fast above your heads, or raking in subscribers and dollars either.


Reply
Feb 20, 2019 12:31:45   #
SafetySam Loc: Colorado
 
gilpog wrote:
I also prefer the original shot. But there seems to be a road sign at the bottom right of the image. I would remove that (cloning out). I am a strong user of gradients in my photography and I would use that tool to darken slightly the foreground so that the eye is appropriately drawn to the center of the image which is very good.


Thanks gulping! I am learning the post process and am amazed at the capabilities offered. I remember when “pictures don’t lie” and today they don’t have to show the full “realities”. When I attempt to remove the road and the people on the path, I can remove the road sign and also grade the foreground.
I appreciate your comments and suggestions!

Reply
Feb 22, 2019 16:13:27   #
raymondh Loc: Walker, MI
 
I think this lends itself to a more panoramic image which is obviously a personal preference.
Other than that, I think its a terrific shot.


(Download)

Reply
Feb 22, 2019 16:25:06   #
SafetySam Loc: Colorado
 
raymondh wrote:
I think this lends itself to a more panoramic image which is obviously a personal preference.
Other than that, I think its a terrific shot.


I agree a panaramic may have been the better choice but may have lost the peak in the gistsnce. Thanks for looking!

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.