Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Photo Critique Section section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
"Did you bokeh my child?"
Page <prev 2 of 8 next> last>>
Feb 19, 2019 23:10:14   #
jaymatt Loc: Alexandria, Indiana
 
Language and word meanings are ever-changing as time passes. Purists may win the battle here over the meaning of bokeh, but they will lose the war.

Reply
Feb 20, 2019 05:32:46   #
bbrown5154 Loc: Baltimore, MD
 
JohnSwanda wrote:
Has anyone seen the new iPhone commercial touting their new "bokeh" feature? One mother scolds another for "bokehing" her child in the background. Problem is, Apple doesn't know what the word means, or that it's not a verb. They seem to think it means throwing the background out of focus, which some uninformed photographers also believe. Bokeh is actually the aesthetic quality of the out-of-focus background blur, usually as a characteristic of a specific lens, not the blurring itself. Now the general public will have the same misunderstanding.
Has anyone seen the new iPhone commercial touting ... (show quote)


LOL, I've seen it and thought it was funny. A lot of words are used as verbs that aren't necessarily verbs.
Don't get too caught up in the technical definition because "technically" Apple is correct.

Reply
Feb 20, 2019 05:33:31   #
bbrown5154 Loc: Baltimore, MD
 

Reply
Check out Film Photography section of our forum.
Feb 20, 2019 05:36:18   #
bbrown5154 Loc: Baltimore, MD
 
JohnSwanda wrote:
It is a word used to compare the quality of out of focus blur when evaluating different lenses. You can say the difference between good and bad bokeh is the amount of blur, but you would be wrong. it's not what I "think" the meaning of the word is, it's the established definition.



I think you are getting waaay too caught up in "established definition".
For example remember when "bad" meant something bad or that "cool" meant something cold?

Reply
Feb 20, 2019 05:37:02   #
bbrown5154 Loc: Baltimore, MD
 
robertjerl wrote:
Language evoles, even borrowed words from other languages.
To the public at large "bokeh" is coming to mean the out of focus background that makes the main subject stand out. Your definition will either fade out all together or only be a bit of technical jargon used by some photographers and optical engineers.
Many words have different meanings to different people.

What does "rock" mean?
in a music store
to someone on a boat/ship (or in a earthquake)
to someone in a certain type of chair just relaxing on the porch
to someone trying to calm down a baby
to a geologist

So, to most people "bokeh" has come to mean a blurred background.
To you and others it is the aesthetic quality of that blurred background.
Language evoles, even borrowed words from other la... (show quote)


^^This^^

Reply
Feb 20, 2019 06:18:23   #
traderjohn Loc: New York City
 
BebuLamar wrote:
That way they can sell more phones. They don't need their customers to understand just to buy into whatever they sell.


I'm sure every customer who buys a DSLR "understands" the camera. Right? I think the advances in the cell phone in the last 5 years outweigh the level in the DSLR's.

Reply
Feb 20, 2019 06:42:43   #
ELNikkor
 
I'm still seething about this silly "gifting" mess. How many times to I have to yell that "gift" is the noun, and "give" is the verb!! You don't "gift" something to somebody, you GIVE it to them!!

Reply
Check out Panorama section of our forum.
Feb 20, 2019 06:49:37   #
WessoJPEG Loc: Cincinnati, Ohio
 
robertjerl wrote:
Language evoles, even borrowed words from other languages.
To the public at large "bokeh" is coming to mean the out of focus background that makes the main subject stand out. Your definition will either fade out all together or only be a bit of technical jargon used by some photographers and optical engineers.
Many words have different meanings to different people.

What does "rock" mean?
in a music store
to someone on a boat/ship (or in a earthquake)
to someone in a certain type of chair just relaxing on the porch
to someone trying to calm down a baby
to a geologist

So, to most people "bokeh" has come to mean a blurred background.
To you and others it is the aesthetic quality of that blurred background.
Language evoles, even borrowed words from other la... (show quote)



Reply
Feb 20, 2019 07:09:06   #
BebuLamar
 
traderjohn wrote:
I'm sure every customer who buys a DSLR "understands" the camera. Right? I think the advances in the cell phone in the last 5 years outweigh the level in the DSLR's.


I said nothing about people who buy DSLR's. I just said that Apple wants to sell their phones. I also do not say that which is better the phone or the DSLR.

Reply
Feb 20, 2019 07:35:32   #
Orson Burleigh Loc: Annapolis, Maryland, USA
 
JohnSwanda wrote:
Has anyone seen the new iPhone commercial touting their new "bokeh" feature? One mother scolds another for "bokehing" her child in the background. Problem is, Apple doesn't know what the word means, or that it's not a verb. They seem to think it means throwing the background out of focus, which some uninformed photographers also believe. Bokeh is actually the aesthetic quality of the out-of-focus background blur, usually as a characteristic of a specific lens, not the blurring itself. Now the general public will have the same misunderstanding.
Has anyone seen the new iPhone commercial touting ... (show quote)


In the spirit of Norma Loquendi (“Consuetudo, jus et norma loquendi…” : The right method of speaking and pronouncing is established by custom... ), we almost have to accept that nouns will be verbed in post modern English. Rather than supinely accepting the naked derived regularized forms ('to bokeh', 'bokehed', 'bokehing', etcetera), we, as true keepers of the photographic flame, would be well advised to promote and popularize 'bokehvate' as the preferred form of the verb derived from the barrowed Japanese word 'bokeh.' It would follow that the 'bokehvate' process would be known as 'bokehvation' and the gerund would be 'bokehvating.'

Reply
Feb 20, 2019 07:37:03   #
traderjohn Loc: New York City
 
BebuLamar wrote:
I said nothing about people who buy DSLR's. I just said that Apple wants to sell their phones. I also do not say that which is better the phone or the DSLR.

"They don't need their customers to understand just to buy into whatever they sell."
I just expanded your premise. The same would hold true for the camera industry.

Reply
Check out AI Artistry and Creation section of our forum.
Feb 20, 2019 07:44:28   #
fotobyferg
 
repleo wrote:
Let the unwashed masses wallow in their misunderstanding. We real photographers with our real cameras can revell in our superior knowledge while those iPhone losers send their cool out-of-focus-background shots to their friends around the world before we can get the lens cap off of our f1.4 on a FF body.


Lol....true!

Reply
Feb 20, 2019 07:47:13   #
jaymatt Loc: Alexandria, Indiana
 
ELNikkor wrote:
I'm still seething about this silly "gifting" mess. How many times to I have to yell that "gift" is the noun, and "give" is the verb!! You don't "gift" something to somebody, you GIVE it to them!!


AMEN!

Reply
Feb 20, 2019 07:51:47   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
JohnSwanda wrote:
They seem to think it means throwing the background out of focus...


For all practical purposes, that is exactly what it means. The quality aspect is just an arguing point. We have a similar situation with a DX lens on an FX body. Posters have to be very careful how they word the fact that the DX lens produces an increased telephoto effect.

"The word comes from Japanese language, which literally translates as “blur”."
https://photographylife.com/what-is-bokeh

If bokeh is blur, then you can talk about good blur and bad blur, which is what bokeh is all about.

Reply
Feb 20, 2019 07:52:49   #
Orson Burleigh Loc: Annapolis, Maryland, USA
 
ELNikkor wrote:
I'm still seething about this silly "gifting" mess. How many times to I have to yell that "gift" is the noun, and "give" is the verb!! You don't "gift" something to somebody, you GIVE it to them!!


True that!

Use of 'Gift' as a verb is so gratuitously, egregiously redundant as to very nearly force me back into the prescriptivist camp. My own 'nails across a blackboard' reaction to 'gifting' is metaphorical decimation. (That's Metaphorical! - I'm not really willing to sacrifice a finger and a toe).

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 8 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.