Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Suggestions/opinions on Nikon AF-S VR Micro-NIKKOR 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED Lens
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Feb 19, 2019 13:03:03   #
Screamin Scott Loc: Marshfield Wi, Baltimore Md, now Dallas Ga
 
When shooting closer than 1/2 life size both AF and VR really don’t help much. Additional lighting allows one to stop down the aperture for more DOF (which is pitifully small as it is) and the short duration af a flash will stop motion, be it your own ( such as VR would do) or your subjects (which VR is no help with) plus you get to use lower ISO values.

Reply
Feb 19, 2019 13:05:40   #
Screamin Scott Loc: Marshfield Wi, Baltimore Md, now Dallas Ga
 
As for your concern about AF speed, landscapes, macro and portraiture do not require fast AF

Reply
Feb 19, 2019 13:31:11   #
juan_uy Loc: Uruguay
 
Screamin Scott wrote:
As for your concern about AF speed, landscapes, macro and portraiture do not require fast AF


Yes, you are right. Thanks a lot for your comments

Reply
 
 
Feb 19, 2019 14:50:36   #
torchman310 Loc: Santa Clarita, Ca.
 
juan_uy wrote:
Hi all, hope you can help me with some suggestions and/or opinions.

I have the opportunity to buy the Nikon AF-S VR Micro-NIKKOR 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED Lens, used, at a very good price from what I understand (asking USD 500, probably can get it by less) at least around my country.
I have thought of this lens to give macro a try and that may also be useful as a portrait lens.

It will be used on a D7200, so not sure if the crop factor would make it too long for portraits and I have read it has some breath issues for macro.
Could you let me know what your opinions are on this lens for these uses?
For portraits should I just stick to the 50mm 1.8?
For macros should I look for another one?

I have read very good reviews from Tokina's equivalent (if you can find it in stock), and I guess that there wouldn't be much difference in cost between new Tokina and used Nikon. I could wait until June/July when I may have the chance to buy a lens on the USA. Would you suggest this?

And finally, if I go for the used Nikon lens, is there something specific I could check/try with the lens to be sure there are no issues with it? (I think that is a little cheaper than I expected and that makes me doubt).

TIA as always!
Hi all, hope you can help me with some suggestions... (show quote)


I bought this lens new from B and H. It is exceptionally sharp. I use it specifically for Macro and flowers. I couldn't be happier.



Reply
Feb 19, 2019 16:21:56   #
amfoto1 Loc: San Jose, Calif. USA
 
Be careful... A Nikkor AF-S VR 105mm Micro lens normally sells new for between $800 to $900 U.S.

One being offered for $500 sounds too good to be true.... ESPECIALLY if it's new!

I found most used ones in reasonably good to excellent, usable condition selling for $600 to $700 U.S.

I did find some used ones online from several reputable, trusted sources for $500 or less, but they were all damaged in one way or another. One had scratched glass, another had heavy fungus, a third had a failed aperture diaphragm... yet another selling for just a little more ($528) is rated "bargain" condition with heavy wear and tear, but functional.

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/used/424744/Nikon_2160_105mm_f_2_8G_ED_IF_AF_S.html
https://www.adorama.com/l/Used/Lenses?searchinfo=105mm%20f%2F2.8g%20ed-if%20af-s%20vr%20micro%20nikkor%20lens
https://www.keh.com/shop/nikon-105mm-f-2-8g-ed-if-af-s-vr-micro-nikkor-lens.html

Yes, if your primary use is portraiture, an 85mm non-macro lens really might be a better choice. I found a number of AF-S NIKKOR 85mm f/1.8G lenses available used for between $350 and $420 U.S., approx. Brand new this lens is selling for $477 (so there isn't a very big discount on the used ones).

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ntt=nikkor%20AF-S%2085mm%20f%2F1.8G&N=0&InitialSearch=yes&sts=ma&Top+Nav-Search=&usedSearch=1
https://www.adorama.com/l/?searchinfo=af-s+nikkor+85mm+f%2f1.8g&sel=item-condition_used-items
https://www.keh.com/shop/nikon-nikkor-85-mm-f-1-8-medium-telephoto-lens-for-nikon-f-bayonet.html

Note that the 85mm f/1.8G do not have images stabilization (AFAIK, the only 85mm f/1.8 with it is a Tamron). But I imagine it will focus faster than a macro lens.

If you wanted to be able to use an 85mm for close-ups too, simply get a set of macro extension tubes. The Kenko tube set includes three in 12mm, 20mm and 36mm sizes, sells for $130 new, is well made and fully supports autofocus, aperture control and images stabilization on lenses that have it. I've used macro extension tubes for 25+ years on various systems and currently have a Kenko set and several individual Canon tubes for my Canon camera system (I've got others for use on vintage Nikon gear).

I used a 20mm or 25mm extension on a Canon 85mm f/1.8 lens for this image...


Extension tubes can be used with virtually any lens, to make it focus closer and render higher magnification than it's normally able to do. The extension tube simply goes in between the camera and lens. They are an inexpensive, easy way to shoot close-ups... lightweight and compact, too. The longer then lens focal length, the more extension needed to make it significantly closer focusing. They're probably most ideally used with lenses from around 50mm to 135mm, though I've also used extension tubes with many other focal lengths over the years. They can even be used with "true" macro lenses.

There are also less expensive sets such as Vello ($80) that work fine, but are not as well made and more plasticky than the Kenko (and Canon)... likely less durable.

AVOID any really cheap macro tubes you might see.... Some sets are $25 or even less. But those lack the electronic contacts needed to control auto focus and the lens aperture. Manual focus might not be a deal, but not being able to set the aperture is a serious problem (the cheap sets can work pretty well with lenses that have an aperture control ring on the lens itself... but many modern lenses don't).

In addition to the 85mm f/1.8 + 20mm extension example above....

... for this image I used a 20 or 25mm extension on a 50mm lens:


And here a 25mm extension on a 70-200mm lens....


36mm of extension on a 300mm lens for the following...


And even a 36mm extension on a 500mm lens to make it focus a little closer with a small subject...


Macro extension tubes have no optics in them... just "air". So they have little effect on image quality in most cases. The above image of the rose bud shot with 50mm + extension shows some vignetting and a bit of softening of parts of the image. It's not necessarily a bad thing. I knew that lens set to a large aperture (f/2) would do that and deliberate used it for this image.

There also can be some light "fall off", especially when stacking several tubes for a whole lot of extension. The camera's through the lens metering system takes this into account, though... so will compensate whether setting exposure manually with the on-board meter or using an auto exposure mode. However, if using a separate hand-held light meter, it may be necessary to factor in some extra exposure when using a lot of extension.

Some time back I was fortunate to find a vintage Tamron SP 90mm f/2.5 macro lens at a local secondhand store for all of $20 (like new condition, with hood, caps and matched teleconverter). I've used several of those Tamrons over the years and new it was good... so I grabbed it when I had the chance! It's an "Adaptall 2" lens from the 1980s.... which was a series that uses interchangeable mounts, and so are easily adapted for use on almost any 35mm film or digital camera system. It came with a Nikon F-mount on it. But I wanted to use it on my Canon cameras, so I bought an Adaptall from China (where they are still being made) for all of $40, including shipping. The left hand pic shows the lens with the EOS/EF Adaptall installed, hood reversed for storage and the Nikon F-mount alongside (I also have Adaptalls for five or six other systems). The right hand images shows the lens installed on one of my DSLRs.


That old Tamron 90mm macro lens is only able to do 1:2 or half life size on its own (most modern macro can do full life size, 1:1). Below is a sample images shot with the lens near that 1:2 maximum (left), a second image of the same poppy buds with a 20mm extension added to the lens so it can focus closer (center), and a shot of a bee on an orange poppy (right) using the same lens + extension.


Using a vintage lens like the above... manual focus and manual aperture.... is rather slow. It's made trickier because when you stop down for a little depth of field (f/11 for all three images above), your viewfinder dims down and makes manual focus even more difficult. I probably took around 75 shots of the bees on the flowers to get two or three good ones!

There are many excellent, fully manual, vintage macro lenses available, if you want to try one. Nikon themselves made their 105mm in manual focus & manual aperture versions long before they made them with autofocus and electronic aperture control. Just be aware that those vintage lenses will be slower and more challenging to work with.... though they are often quite capable.

Reply
Feb 19, 2019 16:40:38   #
juan_uy Loc: Uruguay
 
amfoto1 wrote:
Be careful... A Nikkor AF-S VR 105mm Micro lens normally sells new for between $800 to $900 U.S.

One being offered for $500 sounds too good to be true.... ESPECIALLY if it's new!

I found most used ones in reasonably good to excellent, usable condition selling for $600 to $700 U.S.

I did find some used ones online from several reputable, trusted sources for $500 or less, but they were all damaged in one way or another. One had scratched glass, another had heavy fungus, a third had a failed aperture diaphragm... yet another selling for just a little more ($528) is rated "bargain" condition with heavy wear and tear, but functional.

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/used/424744/Nikon_2160_105mm_f_2_8G_ED_IF_AF_S.html
https://www.adorama.com/l/Used/Lenses?searchinfo=105mm%20f%2F2.8g%20ed-if%20af-s%20vr%20micro%20nikkor%20lens
https://www.keh.com/shop/nikon-105mm-f-2-8g-ed-if-af-s-vr-micro-nikkor-lens.html

Yes, if your primary use is portraiture, an 85mm non-macro lens really might be a better choice. I found a number of AF-S NIKKOR 85mm f/1.8G lenses available used for between $350 and $420 U.S., approx. Brand new this lens is selling for $477 (so there isn't a very big discount on the used ones).

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?Ntt=nikkor%20AF-S%2085mm%20f%2F1.8G&N=0&InitialSearch=yes&sts=ma&Top+Nav-Search=&usedSearch=1
https://www.adorama.com/l/?searchinfo=af-s+nikkor+85mm+f%2f1.8g&sel=item-condition_used-items
https://www.keh.com/shop/nikon-nikkor-85-mm-f-1-8-medium-telephoto-lens-for-nikon-f-bayonet.html

Note that the 85mm f/1.8G do not have images stabilization (AFAIK, the only 85mm f/1.8 with it is a Tamron). But I imagine it will focus faster than a macro lens.

If you wanted to be able to use an 85mm for close-ups too, simply get a set of macro extension tubes. The Kenko tube set includes three in 12mm, 20mm and 36mm sizes, sells for $130 new, is well made and fully supports autofocus, aperture control and images stabilization on lenses that have it. I've used macro extension tubes for 25+ years on various systems and currently have a Kenko set and several individual Canon tubes for my Canon camera system (I've got others for use on vintage Nikon gear). I used a 20mm or 25mm extension on my Canon 85mm f/1.8 lens for the following image...


Extension tubes can be used with virtually any lens, to make it focus closer and render higher magnification than it's normally able to do. The extension tube simply goes in between the camera and lens. They are an inexpensive, easy way to shoot close-ups... lightweight and compact, too. The longer then lens focal length, the more extension needed to make it significantly closer focusing. They're probably most ideally used with lenses from around 50mm to 135mm, though I've also used extension tubes with many other focal lengths over the years. They can even be used with "true" macro lenses.

There are also less expensive sets such as Vello ($80) that work fine, but are not as well made and more plasticky than the Kenko (and Canon)... likely less durable.

AVOID any really cheap macro tubes you might see.... Some sets are $25 or even less. But those lack the electronic contacts needed to control auto focus and the lens aperture. Manual focus might not be a deal, but not being able to set the aperture is a serious problem (the cheap sets can work pretty well with lenses that have an aperture control ring on the lens itself... but many modern lenses don't).

In addition to the 85mm f/1.8 + 20mm extension example above....

... for this image I used a 20 or 25mm extension on a 50mm lens:


And here a 25mm extension on a 70-200mm lens....


35mm of extension on a 300mm lens for the following...


And even a 36mm extension on a 500mm lens to make it focus a little closer with a small subject...


Macro extension tubes have no optics in them... just "air". So they have little effect on image quality in most cases. The image of the rose bud shot with 50mm + extension above shows some vignetting and a bit of softening of parts of the image, which was deliberate. I knew that lens set to a large aperture (f/2) would do that. It's not necessarily a bad thing.

There also can be some light "fall off", especially when stacking several tubes for a whole lot of extension. The camera's through the lens metering system takes this into account, though... so will compensate whether setting exposure manually with the on-board meter or using an auto exposure mode. However, if using a separate hand-held light meter, it may be necessary to factor in some extra exposure when using a lot of extension.

Some time back I was fortunate to find a vintage Tamron SP 90mm f/2.5 macro lens at a local secondhand store for all of $20 (like new condition, with hood, caps and matched teleconverter). It's an "Adaptall 2" lens from the 1980s.... which was a series that uses interchangeable mounts, and so are easily adapted for use on almost any 35mm film or digital camera system. It came with a Nikon F-mount on it. But I wanted to use it on my Canon cameras, so I bought an Adaptall from China (where they are still being made) for all of $40, including shipping. The left hand pic shows the lens with the EOS/EF Adaptall installed, hood reversed for storage and the Nikon F-mount alongside (I also have Adaptalls for five or six other systems). The right hand images shows the lens installed on one of my DSLRs.


That old Tamron 90mm macro lens is only able to do 1:2 or half life size on its own (most modern macro can do full life size, 1:1). Below is a sample images shot with the lens near that 1:2 maximum (left), a second image of the same poppy buds with a 20mm extension added to the lens so it can focus closer (center), and a shot of a bee on an orange poppy (right) using the same lens + extension.


Using a vintage lens like the above... manual focus and manual aperture.... is rather slow. It's made trickier because when you stop down for a little depth of field (f/11 for all three images above), your viewfinder dims down and makes manual focus even more difficult. I probably took around 75 shots of the bees on the flowers to get two or three good ones!
Be careful... A Nikkor AF-S VR 105mm Micro lens no... (show quote)


Thanks for all this information and examples.
Although the 105mm was a used one, I agree that 500 seems like too cheap to be true (even more here, where gear is way more expensive than in the US). I was considering it only if I could try it before purchase. My hope was that may be the seller didn't have enough information of what he was selling.

After reading your comment, and seeing your examples, I will probably go the "tubes path" for macro. At least until I know I want to take macro seriously.
And will probably focus more on a lens more appropriate for portraits. Or I could just control GAS and keep saving for the future.

Reply
Feb 20, 2019 17:36:06   #
davidb1879
 
Re: Juan UI, macro lens. When purchasing a used lens, you should check wether the seller offers 30 day free returns. If he doesn't, that is something to consider. You can purchase the tokina 100mm f2.8 macro from B & H photo in Manhattan. They offer a six year manufacturer's warranty. Also, you can return the lens within 30 days on a no questions asked basis. A brand new tokina at B & H sells for $300 plus. Davidb1879.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.