Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

ONE HUNDRED FIFTY MILLION in Russian money to the Clinton foundation, Uranium One goes to those making the contributions..... Nope, nothing to see in her background.

Frank T Loc: New York, NY

Come on Blurry. That Uranium One story has been debunked so many times that it's become a legend now.
How can you still believe it?

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

No, what you don't seem to understand just as you h**e big business they are not the only ones fleecing the American people, the wealth of the Clinton's, who have never produced a damn thing in their lives, is measured in the 100's of millions. The Clinton's had tremendous influence in the federal government, folks at the State Department were often working on foundation issues, and no Frank, the Uranium One story was not debunked, it was successfully covered up by those involved and a press that is simply not interested in reporting that would damage their party.

I do believe that there is still an ongoing IG investigation into some of the issues surrounding the State Department and the Foundation, and we have a new AG who may very well inclined to look into some of the matters that have previously been avoided. Issues that would rock corrupt DC to its core.

dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho

Holy CRAP, it would appear the OP is comparing numbers from Obama to Trump. If you want to compare other Presidents then why not start your own thread showing what you want to show.

Dennis

dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho

Exactly right. If not for perceived and made up evils of the world the Democrats would have nothing to fight. I recall years ago Democrats pointed out that if people v**ed Republican there would be church bombings in the South, to get black people to v**e Democratic. Of course the Democrats failed to tell them that throughout history it has been the Democrat sponsored KKK who have done church bombings in black churches. Democrats always have some evil they are fighting rather than have positive goals for America. This time they are fighting President Trump. That is it, just getting rid of Trump is their rallying call to v**ers. All because President Trump is successful. No matter what is said of Trump, his boorish behavior, bragging and so forth, it cannot be denied except by lying Liberals, that his policies are successful in making America a better and more prosperous country for everyone of all races.

Dennis

dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho

Could it be that the FBI intentionally dropped the ball when they investigated Hillary. Could it be that the Attorney General, herself, violated the law, of ethics if not the actual law, when she met with Bill Clinton on the tarmac. Do you honestly believe they just accidentally met to discuss golf and grandkids? Surely you are not that stupid or gullible. Even James Comey said Hillary was guilty and listed her offenses. But then said no prosecutor would have prosecuted her. Of course anybody with common sense or LEO experience would know that decision was not his to make. Have you ever heard of the word corruption? It rhymes perfectly with Democratic Party.

Dennis

yhtomit Loc: Port Land. Oregon

The wall is to prevent further illegal v****g and crowding of schools,hospitals...

dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho

Yes of course it has been. But we aren't talking about that are we. What about the 150 million dollars? Why would any country, especially Russia, give 150 million dollars to the Clinton Foundation, supposedly a charity foundation? Does Russian not have its own charities to donate to, to further charitable causes in Russia. I believe Saudi Arabia also donated many millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation. Doesn't Saudi Arabia have charitable causes in its own country they could have contributed to? These are just some of the cuff questions that anybody with common sense should be asking themselves. Why aren't you? Are you afraid of the answers you might come up with?

Dennis

Frank T Loc: New York, NY

I don't know Dennis. Why would they give to the NRA?

RichardSM Loc: Back in Texas

I knew if i read further through the post it would be pointed out about all the corruption. Thank you Dennis for pointing it out the left on this site are so blinded by there own stupidity they can’t see the t***h.

John_F Loc: Minneapolis, MN

With respect to human trafficing, are not the State and Local police the main agencies. What Federal agency the prine actor in this criminal sphere.

soba1 Loc: Somewhere In So Ca

John_F Loc: Minneapolis, MN

These are assumptions. Can you cite the primary evidence documentations.

dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho

I don't know that they have. But even if they did, aren't you failing to answer my question? We are talking about Hillary, not the NRA. Let's get back to the original question shall we. Are you deflecting, moving the goal posts again (I am still waiting for an answer to my previous question by the way), obfuscating, what?

This is the problem, common to you on the Left. You don't answer questions, just bring up unrelated items thinking we will all forget the original question. Most of us do not forget the original question though and seriously want to know what your answer is. It is a simple question. Why would other nations who presumably have charitable organizations in their own countries to support, give millions to an American company run by the Secretary of State? Was it to gain favors in some way that another Secretary of State would not even consider granting? Can you honestly tell us that if the roles were reversed and it was a Conservative Secretary of State getting these millions into their private corporate foundation, you would not be somewhat suspicious?

EDIT: I just looked up money given to the NRA by Russians. It appears from what I read that the NRA received about $2500.00 from Russians, some possibly from Americans living in Russia and some from Russians who live in America. I did not see anything about millions of dollars from Russia paid to the NRA.

Dennis

Bridges Loc: Memphis, Charleston SC, now Nazareth PA

The way you are knocking w****s my guess is that you are black or most likely of mixed race. The way you want to put w****s down with your statistics, you wear your own r****m on your sleeve. Try this -- it is a fact that black on black crime is more prevalent than black on white crime. Why don't people who have a bias against w****s do more to educate and police their own communities and try to reduce crime on all fronts than point fingers and blame whitey.