Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
No 3rd party lenses for Fuji?
Page <prev 2 of 2
Feb 15, 2019 15:33:47   #
le boecere
 
Kuzano wrote:
When Fujifilm developed their EBC coating in the late 60's and 70's they literally walked away with top honors for lens sharpness and have only gotten better. When I switched to Fuji medium format, i literally got rid of all my lenses that weren't Fujifilm and weren't EBC coated.

The problem with third party for Fuji is that I suspect no one can compete with EBC. The market is filled with adaptors and legacy lenses that work with Fuji mount for XF and Xc. The best and sharpest lenses I have used on Fuji have been Konica Hexanon. Closest in sharpness to Fuji's EBC sharpness and cheap at under $100 (plentiful on eBay)

Don't need any other players in the market if you ask me... OK you didn't.
When Fujifilm developed their EBC coating in the l... (show quote)


maybe "didn't" ~ but, I'm very pleased to see your informative post, here, Kuzano. And, I'm still pleased with the Konica Hexanon I acquired from you (though I'm still learning it...yeah I'm a bit slow).

Reply
Feb 15, 2019 21:02:35   #
Kuzano
 
Yes, I am about to make a run on eBay for some more Hexanon glass. Since Fuji broke through the 20 Megapixel barrier to 24 MP and 26 MP and are now producing both X-Trans and Bayer in the small camera's..(X-E3 and X-A5) My interest is piqued even higher.

I hear the Hexanon 57 f1.4 is serious competition for the Fuji 56 f1.2 for only a bit over $100, I know where I am headed. In addition there is a Hexanon 57 f1.2 for around $300 average which can knock out the Fuji 56 f1.2 although manual focus. The Fuji choice for the 56 AF at f1.2 is over $600.

As you might note. I often buy the Hexanon alternatives before paying Fuji EBC prices, but I know the EBC Fuji glass will always outshoot third party glass even if it is AF.

Looking right now at the 24 Mp XE-3, with the Hexanon 57 f1.4 for cheap, and finding the
X-trans and Bayer Fuji's quite comparable to each other. Also, the XT100 is a reasonable option and within range pricewise. The XT100 uses the Bayer Sensor, while the X-E3 is X-Trans. The playing field on post processing the bayer and the X-trans has leveled the field greatly. So the 24 Mp APS-c is the motivating factor for me now.

I switched to Sony A series for the 24MP for two weeks. I'm back Fujifilm!!!!

Reply
Feb 15, 2019 21:57:14   #
le boecere
 
Kuzano wrote:
Yes, I am about to make a run on eBay for some more Hexanon glass. Since Fuji broke through the 20 Megapixel barrier to 24 MP and 26 MP and are now producing both X-Trans and Bayer in the small camera's..(X-E3 and X-A5) My interest is piqued even higher.

I hear the Hexanon 57 f1.4 is serious competition for the Fuji 56 f1.2 for only a bit over $100, I know where I am headed. In addition there is a Hexanon 57 f1.2 for around $300 average which can knock out the Fuji 56 f1.2 although manual focus. The Fuji choice for the 56 AF at f1.2 is over $600.

As you might note. I often buy the Hexanon alternatives before paying Fuji EBC prices, but I know the EBC Fuji glass will always outshoot third party glass even if it is AF.

Looking right now at the 24 Mp XE-3, with the Hexanon 57 f1.4 for cheap, and finding the
X-trans and Bayer Fuji's quite comparable to each other. Also, the XT100 is a reasonable option and within range pricewise. The XT100 uses the Bayer Sensor, while the X-E3 is X-Trans. The playing field on post processing the bayer and the X-trans has leveled the field greatly. So the 24 Mp APS-c is the motivating factor for me now.

I switched to Sony A series for the 24MP for two weeks. I'm back Fujifilm!!!!
Yes, I am about to make a run on eBay for some mor... (show quote)


L,

You've mentioned 24 or 26 megapixels at least a couple of times, here; and, "the 20 Megapixel barrier". Is it your belief that one needs a sensor with at least 24 million of Fuji's best pixels, to be capable of fully appreciating the Hexanon lenses? I'll ask it another way; are the capabilities and characteristics of the Konica Hexanon lenses wasted on the ancient 16 megapixel Fujifilm X-cameras?

_v

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.