Another redo of a D7000 raw file shot along the scenic Oregon Coastal Highway (101) for landscape, sharpening, and equalization experimentation.
Best in download, critiques always welcome and read.
ISO 160, f/10, 1/400, 35mm (kit lens, handheld).
Beautiful sight. Nice shot and composition. Heading there in June.
Was just there last year. Such a beautiful coast. Mahalo for sharing.
Hope you don’t mind. I changed you photo to B&W and messed with it a bit.
ORpilot wrote:
Hope you don’t mind. I changed you photo to B&W and messed with it a bit.
I don't mind, but can you, or any other, help me understand why you think B&W adds information to the photo?
Technically speaking, it doesn’t ad anything. It can change the wow factor or how you feel about it
ORpilot wrote:
Technically speaking, it doesn’t ad anything. It can change the wow factor or how you feel about it
Thanks for responding.
When collecting memories, attempting to preserve, rather than "wow," a memory for others likely is personal, rather than an adventure in art.
I have little sense of art, and so rely on recreating what impressed us there and then, as closely as I can with my basic equipment for our several slideshows that play on our computers when not in use and at invited shows.
Whenever I see a grand B&W, I can't help but wonder about the time of day, the reflections of sky in shadow and color cast, and what other clues of colors were there, but gone missing.
[quote=Fred Harwood
Whenever I see a grand B&W, I can't help but wonder about the time of day, the reflections of sky in shadow and color cast, and what other clues of colors were there, but gone missing.[/quote]
I can understand why people like b&w, I used to shoot of lot of it in film. Ok, it was cheaper, and I didnt have the cash for color.
But... I simply see in color. To me, except for a very few photos, b&w just doent seem quite real. Maybe because color plates in books were so rare when I was growing up. One beautiful frontspiece, and the rest mainly b&w illustrations. Or, maybe because I was nearsighted and used colors and shapes to determine objects, rather than just seeing the objects themselves. If that makes any sense....
Fred Harwood wrote:
I don't mind, but can you, or any other, help me understand why you think B&W adds information to the photo?
I don't even know what added information is so I can't answer the question, but I (almost) always chose B&W over color in landscapes. I don't have the "artest's eye" which is, I think, required for good color pictures but my eye an brain understand brightness and contrast and mood. To me nothing expresses mood like B&W. Bright and shiny, dark an ominous and all the grays in-between. Don't look for subtleties in my B&Ws they are almost always dark and always in your face.
Nice shot - nice composition
Beautiful image Fred - well done!!!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.