Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Nostalgia
Page <prev 2 of 2
Feb 10, 2019 18:31:04   #
GWolf Loc: Ashland, OR
 
I assumed that your images were shot on a tripod, they're so sharp! At least as presented here. I love where you're coming from btw.

Reply
Feb 11, 2019 12:05:45   #
aellman Loc: Boston MA
 
robertjerl wrote:
Dear JohnR:

First, some really nice images there, I esp like the church interior.

Bit opinionated aren't we?
And somewhere here on UHH and elsewhere there are people who believe just the opposite of you and just as firmly.
That is OK, as long as they express it as their "opinion" or have factual evidence to back it up.

I have several cameras, not even counting all the film stuff I still have but don't use.
A FF (24x35 suit you better?), two different APS-C cameras and each has a different "crop factor", a bridge camera with a small sensor, and a pocket zoom with an even smaller sensor.
I also have a pile of lenses from ultra wide 14 mm to 600 mm in two brand's mounts. I do birds, flowers, butterflies and macro. throw in some cars and trains (esp interiors of the cars and engines at the railway museum I belong to) re-enactment events etc.)

And of course a smart phone with a tiny sensor.
That one is to me a phone, though my wife and daughter insisted I learn to text and even use emojis. They also insisted I learn to send snapshots of things with it.
I would still have my old flip phone (Hey! It made phone calls!) but my wife gave me the smart phone.
It was her replacement for one that fell off the top of her car (long story - she was talking to someone when she got in the car...) in front of the fire station just before the sirens went off and two rather large fire trucks came roaring out - phone parts for 50 yards down the street.
She didn't like it, screen too small to play her games - Pokemon Go and Ingress (sort of an international "Capture the Flag" game with local and national teams) and it was one day past the just return it for another one date - so I took it, my flip phone's hinges were cracking, and she got one with a 5" screen.
Two years later it is still smarter than me. It has apps that came with it and cannot be gotten rid of that do things I need a dictionary to figure out. But I did figure out how to put them in folders so I don't have what seemed like 100 icons on 4 pages to scroll through to find any useful ones. The ones I use most often are "calculator" and "light meter".

And she still "borrows" my phone to use when she plays. So at times she is using 2 smart phones two 7" tablets and a 10" Tablet plus our daughter's 10" iPad (she is in medical school and doesn't have time to play-so Mom keeps her accounts active. I found out she enlisted me, got me accounts for both games and that my gamer's name on my phone is "Toad Chef". When I ask where that came from I just get a stare with a bit of a Mona Lisa smile.

The closest I have come to Australia is working with Australian and New Zealand troops in Vietnam in the 60's.
But my oldest son visited in 2017, sorta. His army reserve unit went to Alaska, joined with a bunch of Canadian troops, taught them to use US gear and then they all got in C17 transports and flew non-stop with mid-air refueling to Australia where they jumped over some large air base playing the part of the Aggressor Force Invaders in some training exercise called "Talisman Saber". He complained for 3 months about how hard it was to get the smell of kangaroo poop out of his gear. I reminded him he volunteered to become Airborne Special Forces. He could have stayed a combat engineer and happily built or blown up things until he hit retirement. Then he wouldn't have "Invaded Australia" in company with a bunch of Canadians. They had a rather cute female TV reporter who flew down with them and we have video that shows him twice - and a bunch of Canadians with all ID and insignia striped off their uniforms popping up behind whoever was being interviewed and making faces, waving to the folks back home etc - they had been told they did not have clearance to appear on US TV or be interviewed so they figured out a way to get on TV anyway. Boys will be boys, especially around a cute girl with a microphone and TV camera.
Dear JohnR: br br First, some really nice images ... (show quote)


Robert: You and, moreover, the OP would be well advised to edit your postings down to the more important info and leave some space for the rest of us.

Reply
Feb 11, 2019 12:49:14   #
robertjerl Loc: Corona, California
 
aellman wrote:
Robert: You and, moreover, the OP would be well advised to edit your postings down to the more important info and leave some space for the rest of us.

I have it on good authority that the UHH has a vast supply of pixels.
Since we have been more or less talking to each other, and the length doesn't bother us, you are free to just skip over our longer posts. The world does not really operate in sound bites and twitter posts. At least not very well. Many of the elite/politicians count on most voters not reading and researching the background of everything they put out. If everyone had all the relevant knowledge then their proposals would crash and burn when put to the vote.
I even reread Tolkien, all four books-The Hobbit and the three Lord of The Rings, as a unit about every 2 or three years because I like them.

Reply
 
 
Feb 11, 2019 16:33:24   #
dwermske
 
Wow! What a diatribe. First of all the phrase "full frame" refers to a sensor size that is the same size as a single frame of 35mm film. Most film lenses have a "circle of reference" that is just slightly larger than a 35mm film frame. If these lenses are used on a camera with a sensor that is smaller than 35mm the "circle of reference" is much larger than than the lens was designed for. It produces an image that is actually smaller than it was designed to produce. All these discussions regarding sensor size is in reference to a single frame of 35mm film. By the way it does make a difference when enlarging images to something greater than a computer screen. A "2 1/4 X 2 1/4" with 50 to 100 mp will enlarge or enable detail cropping much better than 35mm or smaller.

Secondly, if you can shoot RAW it's like getting an original negative. You have all the detail the sensor actually captured. A JPG file is not only compressed loosing original data, it has already been processed to a specific white balance and color temp by the camera. Some of us allow the camera to produce both images to get the best of both worlds. The Raw can be modified a great deal while the JPG not nearly as much without distorting the image.

Those were wonderful pictures you posted. You are very talented, keep up the good work.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.