Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
New Monitor, New Computer and a new look at old images
Page <prev 2 of 2
Feb 8, 2019 08:22:17   #
jaymatt Loc: Alexandria, Indiana
 
Second examples are better.

Reply
Feb 8, 2019 09:51:14   #
saxman71 Loc: Wenatchee
 
I'd like to thank everyone for their input on this question. The original images were taken some time back. The SOOC images are long gone and in the case of the Utah images they were jpeg images to begin with. I didn't move to RAW until a few years later. All I have to work with now are my saved final jpegs from those three shots. Obviously, that hampers my ability to "fix" these images. The fact that most of you think the second shots are improved helps me better understand how to approach post processing my future landscape efforts.

Reply
Feb 8, 2019 10:51:43   #
SpyderJan Loc: New Smyrna Beach. FL
 
New gear is always nice, but I think the differences are more a result of your technique changing over time. The first ones are a bit oversharpned, but the second ones go too far in the other direction. You will undoubtedly change your process with the help of the new monitor. Keep in mind with PP, More is not always better. I am sure you will find the middle ground.

Reply
 
 
Feb 8, 2019 11:08:17   #
olemikey Loc: 6 mile creek, Spacecoast Florida
 
Fullframe wrote:
You've brightened them up but lost way too much detail with NR


I agree FF, It must be my monitor, in each case the second shot looks milky/fuzzy not as sharp when zoomed in (and that is different from viewing the small shots in the post, where they do look brighter), I asked my wife for her comments (and she had her readers on) and she agrees with my view.

All I can do is sigh, hmmmmmmmmm.

Reply
Feb 8, 2019 11:08:18   #
AzPicLady Loc: Behind the camera!
 
The second ones do look brighter. But I don't know how to look at them side by side, so I really can't tell about detail.

Reply
Feb 8, 2019 11:34:36   #
Blair Shaw Jr Loc: Dunnellon,Florida
 
For me I'd say the originals had more contrast while the later versions had more high lights. The saturation levels don't appear excessive in either example but the white balance may have shifted to enhance the shy and clouds in the later set.

I like either set regardless and you still did a nice job in checking your work which is never a bad idea and it validates and builds confidence.

Thanks for sharing your thoughts.

Reply
Feb 8, 2019 12:29:53   #
Earnest Botello Loc: Hockley, Texas
 
Well done Chris.

Reply
 
 
Feb 8, 2019 14:32:20   #
bertloomis Loc: Fort Worth, Texas
 
I like the new look a bit better.

Reply
Feb 8, 2019 21:17:07   #
charlienow Loc: Hershey, PA
 
2nd one is best imo

Reply
Feb 8, 2019 22:41:52   #
Einreb92 Loc: Philadelphia
 
I find the original images have lots of clarity and your re-worked images have surrendered their sharpness.

Reply
Feb 9, 2019 00:01:32   #
RCCola
 
I like the "newer ones"...

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.