LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
LWW wrote:
Keep dancing Tommy.
Sorry blurry, I meant to quote Tommy.
LWW wrote:
Dance some more Tommy.
Name a mass shooting attributed or attributable to an i*****l a***n. Show statistics that show i*****l a***ns pose a safety risk to those of us already here.
First you accidently post to the wrong person and are unable to figure out how to correct it (if you are on a phone, it's forgivable, on a PC it's just too easy) then you respond to yourself with a message obviously directed at blurry, and you are the one constantly throwing shade on the intelligence of others. Very interesting.
thom w wrote:
Name a mass shooting attributed or attributable to an i*****l a***n. Show statistics that show i*****l a***ns pose a safety risk to those of us already here.
First you accidently post to the wrong person and are unable to figure out how to correct it (if you are on a phone, it's forgivable, on a PC it's just too easy) then you respond to yourself with a message obviously directed at blurry, and you are the one constantly throwing shade on the intelligence of others. Very interesting.
Very interesting but par for the course.
thom w wrote:
I tend to lose track. How many mass shootings have they been responsible for?
So you are okay with i*****l i*******ts picking off Americans one by one?
Blurryeyed wrote:
Frank, was the congressional hearing on "active shooters" or was it on "gun violence"? I just want to be clear before we go further.
Well if gun violence is the only issue then the answer is quite obvious. We need to control who can obtain weapons. Reasonable restrictions like training, background checks and mandatory insurance for the owners wouldn't be unreasonable.
I know, some of you equate guns to the operation of your penis but that really isn't the case.
And, yes I know "guns don't k**l people, people k**l people" but if that's true why do we give our soldiers guns? Why not just let them k**l people without them.
And, of course, you need your AR in case you need to o*******w a tyrannical government because only an AR can defeat a Wart Hog, An Apache Helicopter or a C130 gunship.
Carry on children, there's really no point in me responding to any of you because I already know how you're going to respond with insults and questions about "how afraid" I am even though not one of you has a clue of who I am or what I've done.
Be well and remain stupid.
Blurryeyed wrote:
I guess that you just don't get it do you, but of course you don't because you are a l*****t, the meeting is about gun violence not about school or even mass shootings. Now, if murders are being committed i******s at a rate of about 60/year in just one state clearly i******s are a greater threat than are school shooters.
Gaetz is just highlighting the selective outrage and over regulation by the left.
This is obvious to most Americans but maybe not to Russian sympathizers. Mass shootings and school shootings are violent. They used guns. Common sense tells anyone that can independently think, that these incidents fit in a topic of gun violence.
I will give you time to call your Russian-leaning friends or your local NRA rep ( if they are not too involved defending themselves in criminal investigations) to give you the current talking points.
Frank T wrote:
Well if gun violence is the only issue then the answer is quite obvious. We need to control who can obtain weapons. Reasonable restrictions like training, background checks and mandatory insurance for the owners wouldn't be unreasonable.
I know, some of you equate guns to the operation of your penis but that really isn't the case.
And, yes I know "guns don't k**l people, people k**l people" but if that's true why do we give our soldiers guns? Why not just let them k**l people without them.
And, of course, you need your AR in case you need to o*******w a tyrannical government because only an AR can defeat a Wart Hog, An Apache Helicopter or a C130 gunship.
Carry on children, there's really no point in me responding to any of you because I already know how you're going to respond with insults and questions about "how afraid" I am even though not one of you has a clue of who I am or what I've done.
Be well and remain stupid.
Well if gun violence is the only issue then the an... (
show quote)
Reread the 2nd amendment. Government is to not infringe.
The ar prevents democrat/sheeple pilots from taking off or have access to aircraft.
Why do democrats always want to limit or take away fellow Americans rights?
mjmoore17 wrote:
This is obvious to most Americans but maybe not to Russian sympathizers. Mass shootings and school shootings are violent. They used guns. Common sense tells anyone that can independently think, that these incidents fit in a topic of gun violence.
I will give you time to call your Russian-leaning friends or your local NRA rep ( if they are not too involved defending themselves in criminal investigations) to give you the current talking points.
Comrade, do you believe in national sovereignty? Yes or no?
Be careful, if i******s can get their hands on guns easily that indicates that they do it because it is easy and because there are no controls whatsoever.
Bob Smith wrote:
Be careful, if i******s can get their hands on guns easily that indicates that they do it because it is easy and because there are no controls whatsoever.
Criminals don’t obey “controlls”, because they are criminals....
Wake up alfred.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.