Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
U.S. Steel nearly triples annual profit to $1.1 billion
Page <prev 2 of 2
Feb 1, 2019 10:31:32   #
EyeSawYou
 
kd7eir wrote:
And those profits did NOTHING to help the workers - "It returned more than $110 million in capital to stockholders last year, including $75 million worth of share repurchases amid a flurry of stock buybacks that followed the corporate tax cuts."


Ummm yes it did, more job creation and more money for stockholders.

Reply
Feb 1, 2019 10:37:00   #
LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America
 
kd7eir wrote:
And those profits did NOTHING to help the workers - "It returned more than $110 million in capital to stockholders last year, including $75 million worth of share repurchases amid a flurry of stock buybacks that followed the corporate tax cuts."


Sadly, you don’t even know what any of that means.

Reply
Feb 1, 2019 11:07:00   #
yhtomit Loc: Port Land. Oregon
 
EyeSawYou wrote:
U.S. Steel made $1.115 billion in profit last year, nearly triple the $387 million it made the previous year but short of analysts' expectations.

The Pittsburgh-based steelmaker, one of Northwest Indiana's largest employers, benefited from Section 232 tariffs of 25 percent on most imported steel, higher steel prices in the United States and a robust economy.

U.S. Steel reported making $6.25 in profit per share in 2018, up from $2.19 per share in 2017. U.S. Steel made $592 million in the fourth quarter, up from $159 million in the fourth quarter of 2017.

The steelmaker's earnings per share totaled $3.34 in the fourth quarter, up from $1.82 at the same time the previous year.

That’s horrible!!!
"We are pleased with both the strong earnings we reported in 2018 and the important progress we made on our strategic objectives," U.S. Steel President and CEO David B. Burritt said. "We are encouraged by the effectiveness of the investments we are making and remain focused on improving our operating and commercial performance to drive long-term value creation for our stockholders."

U.S. Steel made $14.17 billion in sales last year, including $3.69 billion in sales in the fourth quarter.

The flat-rolled segment that includes the Gary Works, East Chicago Tin and Midwest Plant in Portage, made $883 million in earnings before interest and income taxes last year, including $318 million in the fourth quarter. That's up from $811 million in earnings the previous year.

U.S. Steel forecasts its earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization will total $225 million in the first quarter of 2019, but that does not account for the impact of fire damage at its Clariton coke-making operations in Pennsylvania. Flat-Rolled EBITDA is expected to be higher year-over-year because of higher selling prices.

The company estimates it has $10.9 billion in assets, including $1 billion in cash. It returned more than $110 million in capital to stockholders last year, including $75 million worth of share repurchases amid a flurry of stock buybacks that followed the corporate tax cuts.

https://www.nwitimes.com/business/local/u-s-steel-nearly-triples-annual-profit-to-billion/article_ce3c7be7-508f-5783-8b1a-030d502f7fb4.html
U.S. Steel made $1.115 billion in profit last year... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Feb 1, 2019 12:21:40   #
Cykdelic Loc: Now outside of Chiraq & Santa Fe, NM
 
kd7eir wrote:
And those profits did NOTHING to help the workers - "It returned more than $110 million in capital to stockholders last year, including $75 million worth of share repurchases amid a flurry of stock buybacks that followed the corporate tax cuts."


So you’re saying that they didn’t give raises, promotions, add to 401Ks, add new headcount, etc., and SOMEHOW our l*****t media missed it??????

Reply
Feb 1, 2019 12:22:33   #
Cykdelic Loc: Now outside of Chiraq & Santa Fe, NM
 
soba1 wrote:
Nope I disagree it’s a result of Obama’s long term policies finally taking affect



Noooooooo.....it’s the continuation of Bill Clinton’s policies!

Reply
Feb 1, 2019 14:53:45   #
Ka2azman Loc: Tucson, Az
 
kd7eir wrote:
And those profits did NOTHING to help the workers - "It returned more than $110 million in capital to stockholders last year, including $75 million worth of share repurchases amid a flurry of stock buybacks that followed the corporate tax cuts."


It put the laid off workers back to work at higher paying jobs. As a worker you sell your time and that is all. After the hours of work and paid for, your day ends and you have no other responsibility to the job. While you are resting others are advancing (risking) their money to keep the place going. 24/7 365.

If you agreed to an hourly wage (your option to take it or not) why do you deserve more? You have no risk involved nor your money, nor any time outside the hours you were paid for!

Reply
Feb 1, 2019 20:42:47   #
skylane5sp Loc: Puyallup, WA
 
kd7eir wrote:
And those profits did NOTHING to help the workers - "It returned more than $110 million in capital to stockholders last year, including $75 million worth of share repurchases amid a flurry of stock buybacks that followed the corporate tax cuts."


Your reality really, really sucks, doesn't it.
I bet you'd b***h if you were hung with a new rope, wouldn't you...

Reply
 
 
Feb 1, 2019 20:47:54   #
EyeSawYou
 
skylane5sp wrote:
Your reality really, really sucks, doesn't it.
I bet you'd b***h if you were hung with a new rope, wouldn't you...


Weren't these the same loonies that claimed Trumps tariffs would destroy the U.S Steel industry?

Reply
Feb 2, 2019 14:20:12   #
dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho
 
kd7eir wrote:
And those profits did NOTHING to help the workers - "It returned more than $110 million in capital to stockholders last year, including $75 million worth of share repurchases amid a flurry of stock buybacks that followed the corporate tax cuts."


Those workers had a job didn't they, a job they were paid for doing. Every one of them had a choice of working for a company at XXX dollars per pay period. They agreed and took the job. They were paid for doing exactly what the company wanted them to do. They have no gripe or complaint. They got exactly what was promised to them. If they do not like the outcome that the company did very well then they have the option of working somewhere else.

What is your complaint? How does any of this affect you?

Dennis

Reply
Feb 2, 2019 14:23:10   #
wilpharm Loc: Oklahoma
 
dennis2146 wrote:
Those workers had a job didn't they, a job they were paid for doing. Every one of them had a choice of working for a company at XXX dollars per pay period. They agreed and took the job. They were paid for doing exactly what the company wanted them to do. They have no gripe or complaint. They got exactly what was promised to them. If they do not like the outcome that the company did very well then they have the option of working somewhere else.

What is your complaint? How does any of this affect you?

Dennis
Those workers had a job didn't they, a job they we... (show quote)


I guess he thinks stockholders do not care about dividends...

Reply
Feb 2, 2019 14:26:13   #
thom w Loc: San Jose, CA
 
Ka2azman wrote:
It put the laid off workers back to work at higher paying jobs. As a worker you sell your time and that is all. After the hours of work and paid for, your day ends and you have no other responsibility to the job. While you are resting others are advancing (risking) their money to keep the place going. 24/7 365.

If you agreed to an hourly wage (your option to take it or not) why do you deserve more? You have no risk involved nor your money, nor any time outside the hours you were paid for!
It put the laid off workers back to work at higher... (show quote)


Contracts where workers made allowances for how unprofitable an industry was, should be able to be opened when circumstances change drasrically.

Reply
 
 
Feb 2, 2019 16:20:26   #
letmedance Loc: Walnut, Ca.
 
thom w wrote:
Contracts where workers made allowances for how unprofitable an industry was, should be able to be opened when circumstances change drasrically.


At the end of the contract when negotiating the next cintract. In my case it was every three years.

Reply
Feb 3, 2019 09:10:51   #
wilpharm Loc: Oklahoma
 
thom w wrote:
Contracts where workers made allowances for how unprofitable an industry was, should be able to be opened when circumstances change drasrically.


HAHA..when industry goes to s**t you dont want less wages , do you??...

Reply
Feb 3, 2019 10:38:16   #
dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho
 
wilpharm wrote:
HAHA..when industry goes to s**t you dont want less wages , do you??...


A good point. I seldom see unions agreeing to less wages for employees when the bottom starts dropping out. I am not saying it has never happened but very seldom.

Dennis

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.