Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Black and White Photography section of our forum.
Landscape Photography
Wasatch views
Jan 30, 2019 19:44:52   #
UTMike Loc: South Jordan, UT
 
This morning I posted my captures of the Oquirrh Mountains in the Panorama section. I am posting these here to get advice on the foregrounds (or lack thereof). My best vantage point involves a lot of foreground and I am not sure that my editing is always the best for the picture.


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
Jan 30, 2019 20:31:10   #
Cany143 Loc: SE Utah
 
Of an infinite number of ways to compose, you might consider the following: shoot for an equal amount of area above and below your subject (i.e., the Quirrhas). Whether that's a lot or a little, unless there's reason to emphasize one or the other (the sky or the communities between you and the mts), a more balanced approach often works more effectively. In terms of foreground, you don't have one. You have a rather distant 'middle ground.' Is there some feature --a rock, a tree, a weed, your wife, whatever-- that might be incorporated into the image, as a foreground element that points or pulls a viewer into the distance? Yes, its difficult to shoot something 6' or 8' feet away with what? a 400mm lens? AND have infinity in focus, and result in everything being in focus and within dof, but its certainly possible, either with a small aperture or by way of focus stacking.

Just thoughts, little more, Mike.

Reply
Jan 30, 2019 20:43:42   #
UTMike Loc: South Jordan, UT
 
Cany143 wrote:
Of an infinite number of ways to compose, you might consider the following: shoot for an equal amount of area above and below your subject (i.e., the Quirrhas). Whether that's a lot or a little, unless there's reason to emphasize one or the other (the sky or the communities between you and the mts), a more balanced approach often works more effectively. In terms of foreground, you don't have one. You have a rather distant 'middle ground.' Is there some feature --a rock, a tree, a weed, your wife, whatever-- that might be incorporated into the image, as a foreground element that points or pulls a viewer into the distance? Yes, its difficult to shoot something 6' or 8' feet away with what? a 400mm lens? AND have infinity in focus, and result in everything being in focus and within dof, but its certainly possible, either with a small aperture or by way of focus stacking.

Just thoughts, little more, Mike.
Of an infinite number of ways to compose, you migh... (show quote)


Thanks for taking the time, Jim. I appreciate the good suggestions.

Reply
Check out Astronomical Photography Forum section of our forum.
Jan 31, 2019 05:47:04   #
CLF Loc: Raleigh, NC
 
UTMike wrote:
This morning I posted my captures of the Oquirrh Mountains in the Panorama section. I am posting these here to get advice on the foregrounds (or lack thereof). My best vantage point involves a lot of foreground and I am not sure that my editing is always the best for the picture.



Mike, I like both of them, but the second one with the foreground shows the distance involved and for me I like it a tad better. If I never saw the second photo than I would not have been able to make this statement and would love the first one as is. I believe what I am saying is that they are both fantastic images.

Greg

Reply
Jan 31, 2019 06:57:28   #
nimbushopper Loc: Tampa, FL
 
Nice, I prefer the second one!

Reply
Jan 31, 2019 11:17:06   #
Rich1939 Loc: Pike County Penna.
 
nimbushopper wrote:
Nice, I prefer the second one!


Mike, I prefer the 2nd one because it has a sense of scale. Also as Cany143 mentioned if you could incorporate a near object it will help 'anchor' the viewer

Reply
Jan 31, 2019 16:36:21   #
UTMike Loc: South Jordan, UT
 
CLF wrote:
Mike, I like both of them, but the second one with the foreground shows the distance involved and for me I like it a tad better. If I never saw the second photo than I would not have been able to make this statement and would love the first one as is. I believe what I am saying is that they are both fantastic images.

Greg
Mike, I like both of them, but the second one with... (show quote)


I appreciate you taking the time to look and comment, Greg.

Reply
Check out Printers and Color Printing Forum section of our forum.
Jan 31, 2019 16:36:47   #
UTMike Loc: South Jordan, UT
 
nimbushopper wrote:
Nice, I prefer the second one!


Thanks, NB.

Reply
Jan 31, 2019 16:37:11   #
UTMike Loc: South Jordan, UT
 
Rich1939 wrote:
Mike, I prefer the 2nd one because it has a sense of scale. Also as Cany143 mentioned if you could incorporate a near object it will help 'anchor' the viewer


Good point, Rich.

Reply
Feb 1, 2019 08:54:34   #
dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia
 
UTMike wrote:
This morning I posted my captures of the Oquirrh Mountains in the Panorama section. I am posting these here to get advice on the foregrounds (or lack thereof). My best vantage point involves a lot of foreground and I am not sure that my editing is always the best for the picture.


I think that you need to decide what you want the final picture to be about. Is it about the mountain rising out of the civilization in front of it? Or is it about the mountain itself? In one you might need more of the foreground in the other you might want to eliminate the foreground. What is the story you want to tell?

Reply
Feb 1, 2019 11:15:35   #
UTMike Loc: South Jordan, UT
 
dsmeltz wrote:
I think that you need to decide what you want the final picture to be about. Is it about the mountain rising out of the civilization in front of it? Or is it about the mountain itself? In one you might need more of the foreground in the other you might want to eliminate the foreground. What is the story you want to tell?


And that has been secondary for me because I was worrying about light, etc.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Landscape Photography
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.