Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
use of macro lens
Aug 13, 2012 23:28:47   #
dreamsinart
 
can macro lenses be used as an everyday lens?

Can you take a shot like these with a macro lens?

I thought they were only for extreme close up and you have to use a tripod. I see people are using 50mm, 60mm and 80mm macro. They seem wide. Because I dont have a Macro lens, I use a 105 lens with an extension tube so I assumed the macro had to be a big number to get close!





Reply
Aug 14, 2012 04:27:44   #
Nikonian72 Loc: Chico CA
 
Most macro lenses focus to infinity, just like any standard lens. Many photographers use their macro lenses as portrait lenses.

Reply
Aug 14, 2012 04:45:54   #
Leicaflex Loc: Cymru
 
Yes you can use macro lenses for standard photography. A 100mm macro lens makes an excellent portrait lens.

Reply
 
 
Aug 14, 2012 05:08:00   #
Bret Loc: Dayton Ohio
 
Both of these taken with the 85mm macro lens. Now getting an 18 month old to sit still?...ya good luck...lol





Reply
Aug 14, 2012 07:15:26   #
Cotondog Loc: Saskatchewan, Canada
 
I have a Canon 100 mm Macro lens. It's an excellent portrait lens.

Reply
Aug 14, 2012 09:32:09   #
dreamsinart
 
ok, thanks

Cotondog wrote:
I have a Canon 100 mm Macro lens. It's an excellent portrait lens.

Reply
Aug 14, 2012 09:33:06   #
dreamsinart
 
I am impressed, thanks for the info.
Bret wrote:
Both of these taken with the 85mm macro lens. Now getting an 18 month old to sit still?...ya good luck...lol

Reply
 
 
Aug 14, 2012 09:36:15   #
dreamsinart
 
Sounds like micro is the way to go. I have been using an extension tube so far for detail shots. I have one prime lens and it is incredible, so a fixed length macro would probably be fantastic.

Nikonian72 wrote:
Most macro lenses focus to infinity, just like any standard lens. Many photographers use their macro lenses as portrait lenses.

Reply
Aug 14, 2012 11:57:59   #
Phreedom Loc: Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
 
Cotondog wrote:
I have a Canon 100 mm Macro lens. It's an excellent portrait lens.


Ditto

Reply
Aug 14, 2012 12:21:51   #
chapjohn Loc: Tigard, Oregon
 
Leicaflex wrote:
Yes you can use macro lenses for standard photography. A 100mm macro lens makes an excellent portrait lens.


I agree.

Reply
Aug 14, 2012 12:59:36   #
derekmadge Loc: Waterloo, Ontario,Canada
 
I bought, a few months ago, a macro/"normal" lens, 35mm. It wasn't cheap but does a decent job for non-macro applications and is marginally sharper than my 5-200mm zoom.

The only caveat I have is what I found out the hard way: If your object is too close to you, it will look too large. In the example I had first noticed the effect, I shot a grandfather and his grandson on his knee. The grandfather's arm was around the child and closes to my lens- the elbow and forearm looked enormous compared to the rest of the body.

Reply
 
 
Aug 14, 2012 16:18:20   #
dreamsinart
 
Yes, I have had that distortion.
So you are saying the zoom is almost as sharp as the "normal" lens. They are priced in a much more affordable price range for my budget. What make is it?

derekmadge wrote:
I bought, a few months ago, a macro/"normal" lens, 35mm. It wasn't cheap but does a decent job for non-macro applications and is marginally sharper than my 5-200mm zoom.

The only caveat I have is what I found out the hard way: If your object is too close to you, it will look too large. In the example I had first noticed the effect, I shot a grandfather and his grandson on his knee. The grandfather's arm was around the child and closes to my lens- the elbow and forearm looked enormous compared to the rest of the body.
I bought, a few months ago, a macro/"normal&q... (show quote)

Reply
Aug 14, 2012 16:50:28   #
derekmadge Loc: Waterloo, Ontario,Canada
 
dreamsinart wrote:
Yes, I have had that distortion.
So you are saying the zoom is almost as sharp as the "normal" lens. They are priced in a much more affordable price range for my budget. What make is it?

derekmadge wrote:
I bought, a few months ago, a macro/"normal" lens, 35mm. It wasn't cheap but does a decent job for non-macro applications and is marginally sharper than my 5-200mm zoom.

The only caveat I have is what I found out the hard way: If your object is too close to you, it will look too large. In the example I had first noticed the effect, I shot a grandfather and his grandson on his knee. The grandfather's arm was around the child and closes to my lens- the elbow and forearm looked enormous compared to the rest of the body.
I bought, a few months ago, a macro/"normal&q... (show quote)
Yes, I have had that distortion. br So you are say... (show quote)


The zoom I got is this one- note the date is 2007 so the price was higher when I bought last year. http://photo.net/equipment/pentax/da50-200.adp

Here is the considerably more expensive macro though I scored a deal at the time. http://www.digitalcamerareview.com/default.asp?newsID=3454 (Also, no built in lesn hood now)

I'd ask other members here though about specific lenses. I don't shoot much portraiture and haven't really looked that critically at those shot with my zoom.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.